Spokker
Member
Greetings comrade.SiriusTexra said:However, the entire concept of multiple consoles in the home itself is hilarious and completely backwards. There shouldn't at all be multiple hardware systems present to do the same thing that separate software systems could, and should do with one hardware standard. It's also wasting resources, for the consumer and the planet, for this petty xboxVps3VwiiVpc crap. They are all the same, and are all running on identical hardware, in how they work.
No, I get what you're saying and as an economist I agree that eradication of consumer choice is never desirable for the consumer, but corporations do desire some amount of monopoly power in order to generate a profit. For example, the fact that Mario is on Nintendo consoles and Nintendo consoles only is very lucrative for Nintendo. Super Mario Galaxy 2 is still $46 on Amazon, and people will pay it. Imagine downloading Mario Galaxy 1 (still $40 on Amazon) off of Steam during the big summer sale for $5. And then there are the proprietary controllers and other devices. These are big money makers.
Another example, I would love to play MLB The Show on my PC. That's the only PS3 game I want and I was very close to picking up a PS3 for it, but could not justify the expense. But The Show being so good and exclusive to PS3 is itself partly related to 2K's decision to form a third-party exclusivity deal with Major League Baseball. My game of choice, MVP Baseball, was eradicated from the marketplace. This gave 2K and Sony more resources to work on their baseball games, and Sony simply put their resources to better use.
Consumers lose, Sony wins, 2K screwed up, but probably is better off with the deal as their awful game is the only player on Xbox 360.
There's a give and take. We have multi-platform titles, PC-only titles and console-only titles. I don't see this changing anytime soon.