Holy crap how did I not think of these? I bought these books right when they came out. Decent reads from what I remember, but that was over 15 years ago.
![]()
![]()
Holy crap how did I not think of these? I bought these books right when they came out. Decent reads from what I remember, but that was over 15 years ago.
![]()
![]()
Holy shit! Didn't know this was a thing!
Try the second one just because... then read the first one again and you'll appreciate it much more. I don't remember anyone in HaloGAF liked the second Forerunner book.
I reckon you didn't find the first one good because you don't play Halo. It does feel like it requires understanding and interest in Halo.
Karpyshyn's problems are lack of "show, don't tell" and mary sue (or in case of Bane novels, villain sue) protagonists.
The books do provide interesting backround for Mass Effect world but i wouldn't call the books otherwise good.
Bane novels... the Sith ideology is interesting (if reprehensible). Otherwise the books are more or less meh.
EDIT actually, not sure if the issue was "show, don't tell" but rather generally weak prose.
![]()
i loved this one .
I read the novelization of Baldur's Gate.
It was one of the worst books I've ever read.
Karpyshyn's problems are lack of "show, don't tell" and mary sue (or in case of Bane novels, villain sue) protagonists.
The books do provide interesting backround for Mass Effect world but i wouldn't call the books otherwise good.
Bane novels... the Sith ideology is interesting (if reprehensible). Otherwise the books are more or less meh.
EDIT actually, not sure if the issue was "show, don't tell" but rather generally weak prose.
I read the novelization of Baldur's Gate.
It was one of the worst books I've ever read.
No but I am curious about the Mass Effect and Gears of War ones, are they good enough for me to invest time on them?
Fall of Reach was exponentially better than the game.
Fall of Reach was exponentially better than the game.
You dont like Nylund books AND you don't like Bane series??
...
Good sir, there is something wrong with you.
I read most of the World of Warcraft books. Not sure if they count as based on the game, though.
I read Metro 2033 and that was pretty good.
![]()
I wanted to read the witcher stuff too but never got round to it
I'm not going to call it a masterpiece or anything, but I think it's too much to say it has no plot. Yeah it addresses the history of the Spartan II program, through the eyes of John (AKA Master Chief). I look at it basically as 'Ender's Game Lite,' and in that context it's quite entertaining if you find the Halo Universe at all interesting to begin with. It's also the first pass at giving a closer look at the politics of the UNSC and humanity in general in that universe.
To get a bit more to the point: if you enjoyed Ghosts of Onyx, I can't think of any reason why you wouldn't also like Fall of Reach. In many respects Ghosts of Onyx is a direct sequel to Fall of Reach, as it follows many of the characters established therein (Halsey, Mendez, the Spartan IIs minus Master Chief). If nothing else, it's not exactly a long read.
Read them.
The books are a million times better than the games. (nylund trilogy that is)
PLUS - SPACE BATTLES ARE THE SHIT.
LOL
The game version of Metro 2033 was certainly based on the book and the novel can be seen throughout the game.I'm pretty sure Metro 2033 and The Witcher games were based on books, not the other way