kubricks
Member
Sports are a competitive athletic activity (and are often games)
Thanks.
Sports are a competitive athletic activity (and are often games)
And the International Olympic Committee recognizes some board games as sports including chess. If we are going to be picky, chess isn't a physical activity but it's also considered a sport because it's being used to compete against someone else for entertainment. That's the same as eSports.
Not all board games are considered sport. We would have to define games as sport individually.
Laughing them off is kinda annoying, but they're old people on cable TV whadya expect?
That said they should get this terminology in order. I like videogames as much as anyone in here but the shit is not sports. Definition of a sport requires physical exertion. If the ancient Greeks were cool with calling their Olympics "games" I think that should do just fine here. Not crapping on "eSports" as a concept though, some of the stuff you see is really just insane in terms of strategy and execution required.
The IOC doesnt decide what is a sport and what isn't. They simply decide what games will be played at the Olympics and that is it. Not only do I disagree with them on some decisions of what belongs at the Olympics (equestrian events) but they periodically cycle out games from time to time, making it even more moot what they think.And the International Olympic Committee recognizes some board games as sports including chess.
Well, I thought most people here actually cared about the definition based off whether it could actually be compared to other competitive sports at events like the Olympic games.The IOC doesnt decide what is a sport and what isn't. They simply decide what games will be played at the Olympics and that is it. Not only do I disagree with them on some decisions of what belongs at the Olympics (equestrian events) but they periodically cycle out games from time to time, making it even more moot what they think.
The actual definition of a sport is still a physical activity, no matter what the IOC has to say about chess.
Then what makes some board games sports and others isn't? Is there a clear criteria?
In the end, the youngs will prevail, old ones wanting it or not, so whatever helps them sleep at night.
I suppose people expecting it to receive the same respect and recognition as actual sports when it is shoehorned onto sports talk/news shows (although the mockery was unwarranted) should know why they shouldn't get their hopes up.Well, I thought most people here actually cared about the definition based off whether it could actually be compared to other competitive sports at events like the Olympic games.
If we are just talking about whether this stuff is a sport based off the old definition of the word, then... why would anyone care? Not being a sport doesn't make it any less important or any less competitive.
Most esport games require physical skill, with regards to reaction time and awareness + quickness of fingers in Starcraft for example. Also like in traditional sports it takes a huge ammount of practice to be any good, let alone one of the best.
There is also a higher incidence of certain physical injuries that come from playing games.
Taking all that into account, I don't see why games should be disregarded as a sport - they do take way more physical prowess then chess or poker.
I suppose people expecting it to receive the same respect and recognition as actual sports when it is shoehorned onto sports talk/news shows (although the mockery was unwarranted) should know why they shouldn't get their hopes up.
The problem with including video games under the definition of sports is that you effectively erase the term and are just making sport a synonym for any competitive activity. Because i can't see calling video games a sport, without by the same logic calling Jeopardy or Wheel of Fortune a sport. All you're doing is erasing the utility of a word that works just fine now to define a set of related interests.
Thats not even getting into some of the other real problems of treating video gaems like a sport, such as the lack of universal rules and consistency/longevity for any one game, with the entire nature and fate of the game up to the unilateral will of the publisher...
Kind of with the old guys on this one though I don't agree with the laughing it off.
I put esports in with Darts, poker, pool etc. Competitive games, but no not sports.
If they would just stop calling it "E Sports" they wouldn't have this problem.
They should be call it "G-Competition" or something.
Gaming is not and will NEVER be a sport.
I'm not old and I surely wouldn't call it a "sport" either. So I understand why they laugh.bunch of old people having a hard time dealing up with modern times 
Competitive gaming wants the the sponsorship deals, ad money, and exposure that sports get, or at least that things like poker get. And within the context of that push, because of demographic crossovers and core structure, it's a lot easier to go "we're a sport", push your product to existing sports networks, interface with sports sponsorship liasions, get athlete visas for foreign players, borrow the broadcasting and meta structures of traditional sports without a firm club oligarchy (whether boxing's individual prizefights or soccer's leagues with relegation,) and so on.
I don't believe the name is imperative to the marketing IMO.
What do I know though? I wont try to pass myself off an esteemed world's authority on this matter.
I'd be curious as well. Poker is a 'game', but because of how it is packaged on television it has turned into something much larger.
Poker is a game yes but I wouldnt call poker a sport. There is nothing physical about poker except for the ability to sit in a chair for extended amounts of time. People who compete in poker tournaments are competitors, not athletes. I feel the same logic should be applied to "e-sports"
I count it as a sport, but I also count Darts, Snooker, Chess, Poker and F1. I find the difference between a game and a sport to be incredibly small.
video games are not a sport. unless athleticism is a driving factor in whether or not one is successful, its not a sport.
Kind of with the old guys on this one though I don't agree with the laughing it off.
I put esports in with Darts, poker, pool etc. Competitive games, but no not sports.
I see this argument a lot but it's easily debunked. Chess, for example, is a sport.
To me, what defines a sport is less about physical prowess (though some games require it like rugby or football) and more about the game complexity, level of play, and level of competition.
Wow. A 26 page thread on the semantics of what is a game vs a sport? Who cares? Why don't you guys just enjoy your games/sports/hobbies/entertainment and not worry so much about how they are labeled by other people?
It just strikes me as a bunch of insecure people trying to prove how not insecure they are.
Dismissing it as a sport, I don't mind it. I mean is Golf a sport?
Mocking it on the other hand, that's ridiculous. It takes mental and eye-hand skills to be good at gAming (among other things).
The simple truth is that theres a place for e sports and physical sports to co-exist. Neither takes away from the other. So theres no real need to make fun of the other. This shit is so high schoolish. Oh you are into dnd? Nerd. You play football? What a brainless jock. Pitiful.