I've shot a bow, it's easy as piss compared to the physical difficulty of having the hand dexterity it takes to do 300 apm accurately.
so you've fired an arrow over competitive distances?
edit - and what iamshadowlark says below
I've shot a bow, it's easy as piss compared to the physical difficulty of having the hand dexterity it takes to do 300 apm accurately.
I've shot a bow, it's easy as piss compared to the physical difficulty of having the hand dexterity it takes to do 300 apm accurately.
People still watch real sports? Man, I'm out of touch.
Yes. It requires physical prowess and skill. Motorsports is an apt title for them.
As for "silly post" - Opinions. We all have them.
I've shot a bow, it's easy as piss compared to the physical difficulty of having the hand dexterity it takes to do 300 apm accurately.
It relies on physical dexterity, stamina, and reaction times.
I don't see anything wrong with separating typical sports with 'electronic' sports like this. It certainly is a bit different, don't you think?Yeah I should laugh at esports too. Because they should be "sports" in the first place without stupid e preffix that makes them look different and exclusive.
golf shouldnt be a sport? are you fucking serious?
I'm all for defending esports but shooting a bow is most certainly not "easy as piss", especially not if you don't use all the fancy stuff of say, a modern hunting bow.
so you've fired an arrow over competitive distances?
edit - and what iamshadowlark says below
Bullshit. There's nothing easy about shooting a real bow(55lbs DW and up).
*cough*I've shot a bow, it's easy as piss compared to the physical difficulty of having the hand dexterity it takes to do 300 apm accurately.
I don't see anything wrong with separating typical sports with 'electronic' sports like this. It certainly is a bit different, don't you think?
Bad analogy. There's never been any real distinction on what makes up a musical instrument.The only qualifer is produces sound/music. Sports have always been defined as athletic competitions.
Yea, that's mostly what I think the intention is. To just have 'sports' and everything that falls under that and then 'esports' and then everything that falls under that. A squad-based Halo competition is certainly a bit of a different beast than a 1 vs 1 StarCraft competition or something, even though they are both video games.To think it further, may the separation could work, since video games itself is pretty diverse and to put all of them in sports bracket could make things muddled. Esports term should be used similarly to atlethics, which consist multiple kind of sports. But it should stopped there, no other e-preffix things that related to esports so it doesn't make the term feels exclusive.
Im a fan of football, if football ceases to exist that doesnt mean im going to become a hockey fan.
The same thing works for games. The problem here is that sports dont tend to disappear, videogames do.
*cough*
*cough*
Try to comprehend that I was *comparing* the physical difficulty of drawing a bow to doing 300 APM. Drawing 55lp bow is not easy, but it's not physically that hard. Having the insane manual dexterity to shoot at an olympic level is a whole nother thing.
Guess what, 300 accurate APM is very physically difficult at the level of manual dexterity. It's insane. Somehow I suspect you've never even tried that and have no idea of how difficult it is to physically achieve esports level manual dexterity.
Competitive activities that require high levels of manual dexterity but not 'athleticism' per se are already accepted as sports.
A-fcking-men.At the end of the day most profession athletes would tell you they are a professional baseball player, football player, soccer player, race car driver, basketball player, etc. first and an athlete second.
Getting paid and calling yourself a professional to do what you love is more important then trying to legitimize yourself in the same breath as LeBron James, Peyton Manning, Tiger Woods, Miguel Cabrera, Usain Bolt, Jimmy Johnson or Lionel Messi.
I comprehend that fine, you're still full of shit.
*cough*
*cough*
Try to comprehend that I was *comparing* the physical difficulty of drawing a bow to doing 300 APM. Drawing 55lp bow is not easy, but it's not physically that hard. Having the insane manual dexterity to shoot at an olympic level is a whole nother thing.
Guess what, 300 accurate APM is very physically difficult at the level of manual dexterity. It's insane. Somehow I suspect you've never even tried that and have no idea of how difficult it is to physically achieve esports level manual dexterity.
Competitive activities that require high levels of manual dexterity but not 'athleticism' per se are already accepted as sports.
I agree, but I doubt things will change.I agree it's a non issue but there would be a lot less shit given if the title sport wasn't used.
I have always liked "Competitive Gaming" and "Competitive Gamers" as the preferred term.
The argument over whether pro gaming is a sport or not is dumb. The differentiation between competitive gaming and "real" sports is already made with the term "e-sports," which inherently implies that they aren't a "real sport" but an electronic one. Whether the definition of "sport" applies to games or not is moot because when using the term e-sport, it's already ceded that it's not a "real sport."
And considering that gamers from the getgo considered making that "dumb" term to denote their activity they're literally broadcasting their thoughts on the matter.
It's like an argument on why something that is clearly labelled not a sport shouldn't be called a sport.
That kind of argument can't be won to begin with.
It's actually absurd to even try.
It absolutely is not a sport in the traditional sense, but at the same time, people view Chess as a sport and you will hardly hear people laughing about it.
Physicality shouldn't define a sport. I played years of competitive laser tag and I wouldn't call it a sport, yet I had to stay in pretty good shape to stay competitive, like any "real" sport, but again, I am not going to advocate it as a sport.
Sport can be any and everything. Currently committees determine what is considered sport. Be definition, sports only need to have rules and customs, and be competitive in nature. Arguing semantics is absurd.
Grow up.
Sports need three things: athleticism, competition, rules. If you miss one, you're not a sport.
athleticism + competition = brawl
athleticism + rules = (fitness) training
competition + rules = game
Chess is not a sport and you can hear me laugh about it. Physicality is part of the definition of a sport. Competitive laser tag is a sport by definition, as you are competing against someone else physically with a set of rules.
At this rate any word can define anything and everything. Your definition of sports is incomplete. Here is the correct definition, along a bunch of others:
You can debate all you want about the level of athleticism needed for professional gaming, or the physical activity involved. But sports need physical activity, you can't get around that.
eSports there are winners and losers.
Sports there are winners and losers.
Seems pretty equal if you ask me.
/Did not watch the video.