-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Heavenly Sword - PS3. Not quite 120 fps...
- Thread starter Fess
- Start date
- Status
Feindflug said:
so wait.
Resistance is 30fps?
then why we have shitty graphics? i was ok with the graphics because the game run at 1080p and 60fps
now its not?? screw that.
it looks like PS3 is really not a powerful console and Sony is allowing 30fps so the games look as good as xbox360.
SolidSnakex
Member
llTll said:
They're planning 1080p at 30fps in single player and multiplayer at 60fps with 32 players.
SolidSnakex
Member
3rdman said:
I wasn't aware Insomniac had a hand in actually developing the PS3. Those guys moved up quick with Sony.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
60FPS is more important in multiplayer than in singleplayer. Thus, there will be less effects in multiplayer to achieve higher framerate and more eye candy in singleplayer and thus 30FPS. That's basically their thinking, and there's definitely some merit to it.icarus-daedelus said:
DaCocoBrova
Finally bought a new PSP, but then pushed the demon onto someone else. Jesus.
Good to know that there are some more overzealous than I when it comes to the whole 60fps thing.
The high resolutions + some ridiculously costing post-processing effects are too blame.
It's sad that they think it's important and that some gamers are following. GAMEPLAY and the game being smooth is more important that having a little shimering in the distance or that some texture may get a bit blurred at some extreme angles i don't look at.
It's sad that they think it's important and that some gamers are following. GAMEPLAY and the game being smooth is more important that having a little shimering in the distance or that some texture may get a bit blurred at some extreme angles i don't look at.
Which means you're going to have to stay away from the single player if you want to be good at multi, since the slight difference will probably effect how you play in an FPS. I know it does for me, to the point where I find it hard to actually play an FPS running at a measly 30 FPS.Marconelly said:
For Heavenly Sword, the effect on the gameplay is pretty much non existent since you don't have percision aiming, though I'll be damned if I could hit anything with the throwing option in the demo. Yet it was a little disappointing that it didn't have the fluidity of something like Ninja Gaiden, even if the visuals were putting NG to shame. I really think it doesn't matter for HS, but if I had a choice, I'd definitely go for 60 FPS with less effects, since I'll be playing it, not admiring it.
scooby_dooby
Banned
Ranger X said:
And most people feel a solid 30fps does not affect gameplay one iota.
fortified_concept
Banned
llTll said:
Oh for god's sake. Please point out a 360 game that moves as fast as Heavenly Sword, animates that great and still looks incredible.
fortified_concept said:
Heavenly Sword is Fast? first i heard of it.
i am the first person who would love to be wrong about this. and to see the PS3 as a really more powerful console in terms of graphics. being a sony fan, i really want this. specialy when i am going to spend 500$ for the console
SolidSnakex
Member
llTll said:
fortified_concept
Banned
llTll said:
It's a martial arts action game with lots and lost and lots of enemies. Yeah it's fast. And that's the reason of course why we're pissed it's not 60fps. Do you really think we would care about 60fps if it wasn't fast?
fortified_concept said:
i know what the game is about [ this is respons to your weird looking face too SSX ]
however, from the videos i have seen for the game back @ E3, the game was not fast. unless you consider God Of war is fast, then yeah ok.
and yeah. i am pissed @ the game not being 60fps. so i am for Gears of war. however, due the graphics "wow" factor of gears of war, and the game plays somehow like Halo but in fps and Halo was 30fps. then i am ok.. for this,, i dont know
fortified_concept
Banned
llTll said:
I edited my post. I repeat. Why you think this thread is about and why would we be complaining if it wasn't fast? You negate the whole reason of thread that way.
fortified_concept said:
well uh. i was talking about Resistence being 30fps. thats what pissed me off because i didnt know they changed it from 60 to 30. the graphics of the game are nothing but xbox 1 graphics and yet 30fps on the so called most powerful console from a first party developers? please
fortified_concept
Banned
llTll said:
Well you were talking in general about PS3 games. And btw I was the first person to say that Resistance looks like crap when there were entire fap threads for it (you can look). Not of course xbox1 graphics -it looks better than many 360 first gen games- but still very dissapointing.
SHARKS BITE KILL SHARKS
Banned
fortified_concept said:
Animation was awesome. The graphics were good, but not mindblowing. Gameplay will get old quick judging by the E3 demo. Doesn't really look like anything the 360 couldn't pull off.
Oh, and Resistance at 1080p.... Sony should just suck it up and admit they can't deliver on 1080p. 1080p games are looking like high res turds so far.
fortified_concept
Banned
SHARKS BITE KILL SHARKS said:
I won't even comment on the graphics statement. As for not being fast, well if you guys insist then this thread is useless.
30fps FTW!
bullshit
fortified_concept
Banned
Skilotonn said:
How that negates my previous posts about 60fps and the reason of this thread? As for the E3 demo it was just a small demo in a small arena and btw it was still fast.
fortified_concept
Banned
Skilotonn said:
Action is very fast after 4+ mins into the the demo when many enemies are entering the arena. Have you even seen the demo?
Fess
Member
Thread title:ionicbluebird said:
What is/might/ or will keep you from purchasing a PS3 this holiday season?
But yeah, I'm not too impressed with Sony right now and probably won't get a PS3 until the price for the 60GB version is down to like 3995 Swedish crowns. (which by the way is 548.76 U.S Dollars if the currency converter I used is working as it should, just so you understand why I'm not too fond on getting a PS3 on day one. 5995 Swedish crowns, which is what we get to pay for the 60GB PS3 version up here at launch day, is 823.49 U.S Dollars. $823.)
My interest for Heavenly Sword has nothing to do with this though, once I have finally got myself a fancy new PS3 I would obviously want Heavenly Sword to be a good as it could be.
Kleegamefan
K. LEE GAIDEN
Nostromo said:actually reading the interview instead of just quoting it would be a good thing.
I was talking about post processing effects, this means that often frame buffer bandwidth is completely irrelevant cause we are taking so many texture samples per pixel..
that's why edram on xenos is not going to help you here and in this specific case having 2 busses that can provide you more texture bandwidth can be a win.
Is it that hard to understand? I don't think so
Matt Lee-Microsoft Game Technology Group:
"BUT TEH PLAYSTATION 3 WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO HAVE MORE THAN 256MB OF TEH TEXTURES AT ANY GIVEN TIME, AMIRITE???"
/Matt Lee-Microsoft Game Technology Group
fortified_concept said:
when i said it look like xbox game, i didnt mean it EXACTLY like an xbox game. i put it in the same stage with perfect dark zero. good graphics but not " next gen "
and yeah, i was speaking about ps3 games in general. they are not something special. you have MGS4 wow graphics on the red corner, and GOW in the blue corner. sames goes for Final Fantasy and Lost oddyssey [sp?]
in a way, they both look the same to me. there is no " the most powerful console " sony was feeding us with.
however to be fair, i am comparing games which are second gen games like GOW to a game that is still in development with games on a console that is not even out. to be fair in comparing, i should compare perfect dark zero back in E3 2005 [wallguy] with Resistence. and we get a winner
fortified_concept
Banned
llTll said:when i said it look like xbox game, i didnt mean it EXACTLY like an xbox game. i put it in the same stage with perfect dark zero. good graphics but not " next gen "
and yeah, i was speaking about ps3 games in general. they are not something special. you have MGS4 wow graphics on the red corner, and GOW in the blue corner. sames goes for Final Fantasy and Lost oddyssey [sp?]
in a way, they both look the same to me. there is no " the most powerful console " sony was feeding us with.
however to be fair, i am comparing games which are second gen games like GOW to a game that is still in development with games on a console that is not even out. to be fair in comparing, i should compare perfect dark zero back in E3 2005 [wallguy] with Resistence. and we get a winner
Don't go down that road. I don't want to make graphics/physics/fps comparisons between the games you mentioned because you'll be prooved wrong when everything is at the table. Hell imo you'll be easily prooved wrong even if only graphics are on the table. Anyway that's the last I'm gonna say about your comparisons because I've discussed this over a dozen times and it's got boring.
And btw I hate to do this (defend Resistance) but there are a ****ton of things happening at once in this game. Don't compare it to PDZ please.
acousticvan
Banned
I dont know why you guys are bitching about? GoW's framerate sometimes drops down to 20 frames per second plus the maximum number of characters on screen at once is only 8 and you said wow "this is next gen". Freaking double standard.
scooby_dooby said:
Each time i'd defend 60fps games i would receive an answer like this.
I never said 30fps games are bad or that 30fps is bad for gameplay, i just said 60fps is better. This is a huge difference. Game can be awesome and designed with 30 fps in mind and play good.
The only thing i don't like about 30fps a the goal is that most games can't hold their framerate. If a game is 30fps constantly it's not problem, but since there's frameskipping in most games, i wish the fps would be targeted higher.
davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
Hunter D said:
yes
because it would WALK
LMAO AMIRITE
SolidSnakex
Member
Hunter D said:
I'm 100% sure it can't.
It's Sony's game.
Green Biker Dude
Banned
Dante said:
What makes you think they wont go for 30 fps later on? It would make the new games look better than the ones available, and they clearly think theres nothing wrong with 30 fps, so why would they fix what aint broken for them?
davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
Green Biker Dude said:
how many games were 60 fps that launched with any console?
Rhazer Fusion
Member
I hope it is 60fps. Better framerates make the game play better imo.
fortified_concept
Banned
Hunter D said:
Physics
nuff said
- Status