Coming off my dopamine detox, I started to get back into re-reading the Red Rising series (Red God will be out next year fingers crossed).
Recently finished Dark Age. It's been a few years since I first read, and I remember loving it the first time, but the second read was a struggle.
My first issue, and this is minor, but why is it that the some people in the Republic now call the Society fascist? I cannot remember them ever being referred to as fascist in any previous books, but in this book the F word gets dropped a number of times. However, it doesn't make sense? For those who haven't read it (and I'll keep this short) the Society are heavily and intentionally based on the Roman Empire, blended significantly with influences from Ancient Greek civilization and mythology. That is their culture. Their names, values, traditions etc are based on Rome, and like Rome their big into slavery. However, nothing about them is fascist. It's just so bizarre hearing the fascist term used when this story is set so far into the future. It's like calling the Roman Empire fascist. It makes no sense. I don't know why Mr Brown did this.
The structure of the book is very chaotic. The first three books were very tight because we only had the POV from Darrow, but from book 4 (Iron Gold) we've had a lot more POVs introduced. I love almost all of them, Virginia Ephraim (his last few chapters are epic), Darrow and Lysander are all brilliant, but I can't stand Lyria. Her chapters were hard to get through because she's just such an annoying prick. I'd rather have a POV for Servo or Victra.
The POV chapters are all over the place. The first 120 pages is just a back and fourth between Darrow and Lysander who both caught in the war on Mercury, which involves an
Iron Rain, mecha assaults, nuclear bombardments, man made hypercanes (The "Storm Gods") , genocide, torture, mass human impalings and somebody getting half their face melted off. It is just pure carnage. We then get into the other POV's with Darrow and Lysander making later apperences, but rather than spacing them out we might get one Ephraim POV, then five in a row of Lyria, then four for Virginia, then a random Darrow POV.........It makes it a slog to read. Darrow and Lysander are the highlights as they are both so ideologically opposesd, and this is the book where these two mix it up. Darrow has always been a bad-ass, but Lysander is far more complex and this is the book where readers coming into it for the first time will question who really is protagonist.
Chaos is a theme in this book as everything has gone to shit so much plot wise (IIRC it gets a bit more tidy in Lightbringer) It's not just the Republic fighting what is remaining of the Society. We now have factions splintering off from other factions at a rapid pace. It makes sense, but it's just a little hard to keep track who is fighting with who and what the goals are of each faction. The book is also FAR too long. It doesn't need to be almost 800 pages!
4/5 - Probably the weakest in the series because of the length and chaotic pacing. However, the action is still breath-taking. I don't think there is a writer alive today who can write action as good as Pierce Brown. the ending with the "Charge of the Sunbloods"...........wow. Fucking wow.
I remember liking Lightbringer more, so I'll re-review that when I get round to it.