Why do I end up working 45+ a week ... and still get 'in trouble' for work completed?Right now work 35-40 a week, decent pay for the area, no dress code, no rigid time structure, work from home a couple days a month, close commute and my child's daycare is in the same building, laid back atmosphere...
I put like a 10-15k a year price tag on that for me to bother looking for work somewhere else.
Only downside is there's currently no upward mobility.
Take job the less stressful job if you can afford, use the extra motivation to start a side business of your own to up your income.
Wish I had an idea of what to do on the side.
Just switch to a different company that WILL pay you more. Don't take a pay downgrade if you can help it, especially early in your career. It will compound itself over time, unless you are a master negotiator who never reveals her previous pay during salary negotiations.
If you don't, it's not for you.
I do. Sort of. I work in radio and it's fun. It's a job I don't hate at all but there's no money there. A side gig I have thought of would be doing voice work from my home studio but I'm not sure how to even get that going.
Either way I don't think I can handle another job I hate even if there is money there. Just seems like wasting my days away.
Just faced a similar situation recently. Took a $20K pay cut to move to a company with better hours(every other friday off and 5 weeks vacation) and culture. So far I have no regrets.
Had to decide if I wanted more money, responsibility, lots of recognition but crazy hours and no free time vs. decent money, much less responsibility/recognition but great work/life balance.
I felt time spent with my wife was worth much more than what any job offered.
I would choose a less paying job that I'm happy at over a well paying job I hate any day
Yeah, I'm having this dilemma right now.
My Dad is pressuring me to go for a job at the State's Attorney's Office (criminal prosecution). He knows a guy there. It pays about $40k a year, and you work about 40 to 80hrs a week. After about 8 years you can make up to $70k. You can also go out into private practice and make more, but you still have to stay there a few years.
Currently, I'm teaching biology adjunct at a university. I make considerably less, but am very happy. They are extremely good to me, and told me that entering the PhD program is a forgone conclusion if I want it. If I started the PhD I'd make a bit over $20k a year for the 5 years. I absolutely have the drive for both the PhD and all the post-doc work.
Since, if you are reading this and are confused, I have a MS in biology, I went to law school thinking I could be a patent attorney, but no one two years after graduation want to hire me as one.
So, this is the issue in front of me. I'm as hesitant as I am about the SA's office because I was extremely depressed in law school. I also never took any crim classes, and it's something I never thought about doing. I didn't make either Moot Court or Mock Trial, and I'm don't have acting skills*. I also don't really feel that the incentives are that great. 40k for 60hrs of intense work isn't very good. But I'll admit there is clearly more proximate benefit, and there may be more long-term benefit.
I've got no bones admitting my heart is in science, but I'm willing to do something else if there is a better rational reason.
Anyway, if you want to throw an opinion at me, that'd be fun. The best advice I've gotten so far is that, "It doesn't matter. They are both good options. You end up at different - but both good - positions in the end".
*interestingly, teaching is like stand-up comedy not acting. I can see why brilliant comics often make terrible actors.
Going from less than 7k a year (part-time minimum wage) to 30k a year (full time $14 per hr plus commission) is going to fucking change everything. So yeah, MONEY is important to me right now.
Single? Go for happiness.
Got kids? Well....