• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hollywood can stop, because no plot will ever top this (Unstoppable)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Drkirby said:
Why not block off the train tracks in the area to keep things from getting hit by the train?

Why not pull over the other trains on the tracks?

Why can't a far faster helicopter keep track of the train?

Why can't they just cause the tracks to go in circles till the train runs out of what runs it?

Instead of having anther train pull on it in the opposite direction, why not get a helicopte close, and get on top, and just open/break down the intercar doors?

This Movie's logic sucks D:

1. They do in the longer trailer block off the tracks in towns but lets be honest are there enough cops in small towns to block both side of all railroad crossings?

2. I'm sure they stop other trains from leaving but train rides are very long and most likely they go "Oh snap Bob this train that is no run away is going to smash into this other train full of children who have been traveling for 3 hours and have 7 more hours to go!" And trains don't go backwards on tracks well I hear when towing lots of cargo.

3. Most likely cause nobody in that part of the country can fly a faster helicopter, plus the helicopter kept up just landing people on the train was hard.

4. Because a VERY fast train will tip on curves, they show it almost tipping in a different trailer. Also I doubt they have a giant track loop they could leave it on, the loop has to be longer than the train.

5. Okay so the helicopter part is a good idea, but draggin a person below you about 80mp/h then trying to land them on it would be pretty damn hard and scary for the person landing. This is a cargo train there are no doors except on the first few trains where usually an engineer is.

Okay so lets say they do the impossible task of landing a person on this train from the air, or this off the wall idea of latching on the back of the train from another one which from this point on sounds much less dangerous. Now that we have landed people on this train HOW DO WE STOP IT? I don't know why this train "Has no air brakes" pretty stupid idea how will it stop when it arrives at its destination? Did they break on the way I dunno.
I guess they could disconnect all the cargo and let it slow down on the tracks, but I guess hypothetically it could tip easier when its not being pulled. I know pulling a trailer with a truck if the truck stop accelerating the trailer behind it moving slightly faster sways from side to side if its lighter. But this is all untested just hypothesis. Plus we would still have to deal with the main car on the tracks that would most likely go faster and wreck on the next curve.
So somehow we have to get brakes on a train without them right? How do we do that? Oh well I guess the I agree off the wall, random, and pretty shitty plot kinda works in that sense. I personally would have disconnected the cargo on a straight away and deliberately wrecked the front car in the country. But thats messy and risky.
BTW I saw the longer trailer when I went to see Machete and the first 4 minutes I was in shock about how stupid it was, it looked better later in the trailer but yes shooting the trains wheels would just cause it to wreck right? Don't we want to NOT spill all this hazardous material?
 
spidermanstops-1-1.jpg
 
How much shit can we put on the tracks so the runaway train can run it over?

I love the sound of 2 hours of "what will the train hit NEXT?"
 
ItAintEasyBeinCheesy said:
Damn, thought it looked like a train wreck waiting to happen.............

Jokes probably been made already but meh.

Your joke has arrived too late. I've already taken a different joke, and made a change in jokesville, and STILL got to jokington before your joke.
 
Ooh my god, I can't fucking wait for this movie :lol :lol :lol Going with a group of friends to see this on Friday. It will be amazing.

best worst film
 
Jason's Ultimatum said:
I'm actually curious as to why anyone would greenlight films like this.

Maybe because the last good movie about a runaway train (Runaway Train - 1985) was nominated for 3 Oscar awards & 3 Golden Globes including Best Motion Picture.
 
Commercials popping up on air...still looks insanely dumb. Every other cut is the train smashing into something sitting on the tracks as if people are randomly setting up barrels and crates for it to smash into
 
After seeing the trailer, I'm can't understand how this movie got the greenlight.

And the cops shooting the trains :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
TheUsual said:
After seeing the trailer, I'm can't understand how this movie got the greenlight.

And the cops shooting the trains :lol :lol :lol :lol
The trailer looks awful. But apparently the movie is really good.

Some reviews so far:
Delivers all the goods mainstream action fans could want.
- Todd McCarthy (formerly of Variety)

This is one of those films that sounds ridiculous in concept, but which works incredibly well as an exercise in Everything Going Wrong.
Hitfix


As a big Tony Scott fan, I will watch it
 
TheUsual said:
After seeing the trailer, I'm can't understand how this movie got the greenlight.

And the cops shooting the trains :lol :lol :lol :lol

When you that scene in the context of the film, it actually works rather well :lol
 
Lionel Mandrake said:
The other lead is portrayed by actor Chris Pine, who so far has really only been noticed in the movie Star Trek, in which he played William Shatner's classic character Captain James T. Kirk. Just as we have with Washington, we are forced to compare the role in Unstoppable to the one in Star Trek, which featured massive sci-fi action with space battles, and laser fights. Seeing him fight the train seems to be a massive step down, in turns of drama. In Pine's case, the problem is only magnified by his short resume.

I love the review, but re Chris Pine: have you seen Carriers? I thought he was great in that. I will probably watch this on DVD when it comes out, not only for Denzel, but for the Pine.
 
Just got back from seeing it and that makes this thread pretty funny to read. It's a a very enjoyable action flick that deserves a chance from anyone. If half the movies coming out were this good we'd count ourselves very lucky!
 
Have you guys seen Gulliver's travels trailer? I am not kidding there is whole movie in there. Nothing is left, absolutely nothing!
 
kittoo said:
Have you guys seen Gulliver's travels trailer? I am not kidding there is whole movie in there. Nothing is left, absolutely nothing!

Yes i seen it today when i went to see Jackass 3D with the wife.

It shows all of the major plot points up until the final battle sequence.
 
luxarific said:
I love the review, but re Chris Pine: have you seen Carriers? I thought he was great in that. I will probably watch this on DVD when it comes out, not only for Denzel, but for the Pine.

I have not seen Carriers, but have heard good things.

Regarding Unstoppable, I am very surprised by how well the movie's been received, but that doesn't retroactively un-cheese the trailers. I still have not been bought by this movie. I'm not a fan of Tony Scott, and the whole thing still seems ludicrous to me. I might check it out when it hits DVD, but I'm certainly not going out of my way to see it.
 
Kibbles said:
I totally lost it at that part when I saw this trailer in the movie theater.

In the movie it's definitely a light-hearted, "small town hick cops" sort of situation. The overall tone of the movie isn't really tongue-in-cheek or completely non-serious, but it definitely has it's comedic moments that dip into that territory. There are definitely a few laughs in there but only a couple like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom