I was being called a troll for saying the same thing yesterday. I was being sarcastic.
Oh someone is triggered because someone is enjoying something that they don't agree with.
Incorrect.
It's not. Latency on most TVS is 50-90ms on anything that's not Gaming Mode.
Your stubbornness and unwillingness to adapt (your brain can do it, just give it a chance) is only to your detriment.
taking into account cb cost hard to say what is more expensive, 1800cb or 1440p native
Wouldn't the top issue be related?
I don't know how young you are but 30 fps games have been the norm for the last 4 generations of PlayStation. No one here needs to try 30fps like it's a new thing they need to get used to. If you like playing games at low frame rate that's fine, but clearly a lot people do mind.
Yes that is a know issue… not fix.
'Checkerboarding is free' mentality is very stubborn, in reality it's quite an expensive technique.
OLEDs are suffering from heavier shimmering due to their pixel refresh rates that are nearly 10 times higher then other panels.
but many people got used to 60 and 120 and now say they cant. They can in fact... they played like this and now they say it's slideshow or hurting their eyes.
I thought the same thing. And same.
just try to play the new Cyberpunk nextgen patch on Res mode and it feels off, 30fps is jarring and dosnt feel smooth at all, but Horizon have such a god like framepacing that 30fps is playable without problem imo.
The problem is that increasing framerate disproportionately affects performance. It's not 1:1 like it is on PC for most games. What we are seeing here is what we saw in Dying Light 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy where a game that is basically locked at native 4k 30 fps has to drop its resolution all the way down to 1080p just to hit 60 fps.
I know right. Who wouldve thought that a thread about the Tech review of the game would be dominate by discussion of technical details of the game instead of game design and story details.
Kinda same.
I know there is a lot of joking and exaggeration, but 30 fps literally give me headaches so I try to to avoid 30fps games. The problem is people keep bringing up the resolution mode as a solution for the lackluster performance mode. If performance mode wasn't up to snuff then they shouldn't have put it in the game. It just seems like the performance mode was just a low effort "let just reduce the resolution until we get to 60." They probably could have achieved a much cleaner picture by lowering some other settings; sort of like tinkering with settings in a pc game to get a better image quality without scarifying framerate. Sony is even charging an extra $10 for the PS5, our expectations should be higher.
Is this generation console your first one?
I have had a high end pc since 2004 every console since nes.
Displays in the past likely had much higher pixel response time which cause less 30 fps stutter.
Display in the past... do you mean crap LCD?
So 30fps was fine on consoles before? Did you had headache playing PS1, N64, PS2, PS3 and PS4 games? It just too weird to me from nothing all these people that got sick with 30fps after decades paying 30fps just fine.
This here we agree. I am all for 60 fps modes as longn as it's not lazy
Modern LCDs(LED are LCDs too) have much better response times making them worse for 30 fps.
So you get sick every time you play a 30fps game?
That is fine.
Are you sure about that? Interesting to be fair but I believe my old TVs have better response time than my actual LG CX but the difference in IQ is really outstanding.
I get having preferences and all that, but this is nonsense. The game is great fun, now. And it's extremely playable. Would I prefer resolution mode with 60fps? Absolutely. Would I wait years to play it on PC to do so when I can play it now and have just as much fun? No way.
I'm just talking about the 30 fps stutter, in all other areas the picture quality of modern displays blow older LCDs/CRTs out of the water of course.
