I second this.I've been growed
I second this.I've been growed
If only it could... :/It could save w101.
.Not nearly as much as you'd like to believe
Less than Reddit.
Deal with it.
Anyone who thinks GAF has any impact worth considering in the industry is laughably delusional.
I'd say it was pretty damn integral in the Xbone 180's.
I wish that were true. I like seeing my articles linked on GAF because the quality of discussion is better here than on most other sites, but the traffic is small potatoes for us.If nothing else, we've had a huge impact on the number of clicks Eurogamer, Kotaku, and Polygon get.
Sometimes we are the Dan Hadouken.
Sometimes we are the Spirit Bomb.
I hear they're creating a 200-story-tall replica of my avatar in Dubai.
You're my hero, Dennis.Remember when PC gaming was doomed?
Then I started posting screenshots on GAF and now PC gaming is winning.
Yeah.
The #PS4NODRM post changed the industry.
I then started a movement for us to buy the starter of that movement a PS4.
I was mercilessly ridiculed and downgraded to a Junior Member.
Gamers have the loudest voice of all; their wallets.
No. it's a lie.
Don't let em get to you.So, they followed through on something that they planned from the beginning, but you're just going to assume for absolutely no reason that they planned to do DRM at some point, and then changed their mind last minute? What evidence do you have to support this? What insider, official representative, or otherwise even hinted at that? That's baseless speculation at it's finest.
What a bunch of nonsense.
I hear they're creating a 200-story-tall replica of my avatar in Dubai.
No, it didn't. Sony was never going to do used game DRM. They made that clear at their reveal in February. Paranoid people just started freaking out and acting just in case. Then for some reason people were surprised that there was no DRM, despite the fact that we knew that since February.
Adam Boyes said otherwise. Sony was leaning against using DRM, but it was a consideration. But hey, clearly you know better.So, they followed through on something that they planned from the beginning, but you're just going to assume for absolutely no reason that they planned to do DRM at some point, and then changed their mind last minute? What evidence do you have to support this? What insider, official representative, or otherwise even hinted at that? That's baseless speculation at it's finest.
What a bunch of nonsense.
Regardless of whether people know about GAF, the whole noDRM movement was started here and did have an effect on Sony's decision and presentation, however small. If you read the noDRM movement thread (or even the final few pages), you'd see that.You seriously think the decision by Sony regarding their DRM policies which curbstomped the Xbox One on E3 and caused them to do a 180 was due to GAF? That's hilarious. EVERYONE knew Microsoft dun' goofed when Sony made their presentation. My Facebook blew up with Sony cheer and Microsoft mocking the moment their conference announced their stance on the subject. These are from gamers who don't even know GAF's existence.
As someone above said, NeoGAF has a presence, but it's considerably way less than major news aggregate sites like Reddit. People who think otherwise are in denial.
And you have concrete proof of that where? It's amusing to see people still trying to say it was all worthless even after Boyes said it had an effect. There were naysayers before it started, there were tons during the movement, and it seems there are still many around now. Was its effect huge? No, it was minor, but more important than that is for once, gamers had a unified voice and were heard clearly beyond simply voting with their money. But I suppose that isn't worth much to people who sneer at the notion of a social movement in the video games industry.Yeah no, Sony was never going to add drm to the PS4 in the first place.
Thats what they claim, but I highly doubt that.