This is the best kind of insane.
Yes, those modern dirtsheets and their quality facts, LOL.
I see old school wrestlers more as hard asses who wanted to fight for a living.
Not even remotely same today.
Are you trying to say that the Miz isn't a hard ass?
Wash your mouth out young man! He's the most must see something-something douchebag relegated to the mid-card champion today!
Wash your mouth out young man! He's the most must see something-something douchebag relegated to the mid-card champion today!
When did Vince reveal that he had been working out and he started fighting a few times in the ring? It was in the late 90s with Austin and co.
when he started doing that I thought that made a pretty good addition to the story lines... And liked his dedication
he gives no fucks
WOOOOooo
![]()
Then he came out in 1998 with a sleeveless shirt and was HUGE and kept getting bigger and bigger until the past few years when he finally started to age and shrink a bit. There is a pretty awesome video of him training for a match with Bret Hart a few years ago where he has this great custom made weight belt that he's had since the mid 80s.
Back in the day on rec.sport.pro-wrestling, there were always people fighting over "who would win a real fight between Bischoff and McMahon?" with all the WCW fans saying that Bischoff would win because he's a 3rd degree blackbelt or whatever. All that stuff pretty much ended after McMahon showed himself to be wrestler-level swoll
They're FAT. Just like their dad and cousin Joe. FAT.
When did Vince reveal that he had been working out and he started fighting a few times in the ring? It was in the late 90s with Austin and co.
when he started doing that I thought that made a pretty good addition to the story lines... And liked his dedication
he gives no fucks
I can see the appeal.
![]()
An "awakening" for many.It's great softcore porn these days.
As far as its' cultural standing, I think if the WWE Network ever gets off the ground, that'll be one of the biggest accomplishments in the product's history. WWE is pro wrestling in NA for all intents and purposes, and them launching a 24-hour network devoted to themselves, their past, and their future would pretty much immortalize them.
They had their chance. That promo from 2011 and the MITB that followed is why I'm following wrestling again.
Punk could have been the new Austin. That promo could have been the new Austin 3:16 promo and Austin stunnering McMahon wrapped in one. In 2011, the world wasn't quite as crazy at the late 90s. Obviously you can't just beat up your boss. That's not even remotely believable anymore.
What's the next best thing? Going up to your boss and saying "FUCK YOU, FUCK THIS COMPANY, FUCK YOUR FAMILY AND I HOPE YOU DIE". That was basically the Punk promo in a nutshell.
They followed it up with a 5 star match and what was probably the most interesting angle since the Attitude Era. But then...
![]()
Punk doesn't have it in him to do what Austin did and I'm a fan of punk. Austin just has more charisma. Even as a kid when I watch WCW at late nights the Hollywood Blondes was a team I wanted to watch even though as a kid I didn't understand why. Then I watched him in ECW and even and Austin was angrier there and this made him even better. Then he finally heads to WWE and had the dolla man managing him even though he doesn't need it and this builds more anger in Austin. Stone Cold is just Austin exaggerated and based on what he has gone through in his career up until that KotR promo. The Rock, Bad ass Taker, and the Game version of Triple H, and Foley were all similar exaggerated versions of the guys type of characters.
The closest thing the WWE had to a modern day Austin was Ryder who campaigned like crazy and connected with the fans on his own terms. Of course the WWE squashed him for it.
Pro Wrestling used to be regional depending on the federation/association
WWWF was a North-East operation back when Vince Sr was running things.
then it changed when Vince Jr took over, renaming it to WWF and expanding it to other markets to eventually become nationwide. Then he built up more on better personas and characters and then made Hulk Hogan a face and the rest is history.
No shit. Vince would have snapped Bischoff in half with ease. Vince was bigger than pretty much all of his wrestlers that weren't dudes close to 7 feet. Especially in the the last few years. His match with Punk was hilarious, because despite being a nearly 70 year old man, he's still significantly bigger than Punk, who was the longest reigning champion in 25 years. He was as big or bigger than Hogan when they had their match. Vince is a monster for sure.
Er, well, that would be their first big success. But by the early 90's people were getting pretty tired of Hulkamania, the business was way down in '94 / '95, and WCW almost put them out of business for a while there in '96 / '97. I'm still under the belief that the Attitude Era was heavily influenced by ECW's overall style and types of storylines (don't hurt me). Russo was also pushing for the business to go more into a TV-centric format, or he was just throwing shit at the wall and it all worked out. Either way, WWF/E's success is not purely built on the shoulders of Hulk Hogan.
Hogan is what made the WWF big enough for there to BE a WCW-style competitor, and thus for the subsequent Attitude Era to occur. Of course Hogan is not purely responsible, but he is the foundation on which the company after that was built.
But the whole thing really is McMahon, who was the one with the initial vision to see that there was a market for a nationally-syndicated wrestling program, the one who saw that the old territorial system was nothing but a limitation to large profits and a larger share of the public's awareness.
I agree that McMahon deserves all the credit for the successes of WWE, and I know that it was essentially with Hogan (+ national TV and Pay Per View) that he brought wrestling to the mainstream audience. I just don't agree with saying "he made Hogan, end of story." I think Austin and other wrestlers of that era are equally as important to the survival and overall mainstream popularity and success of the company. Not to mention, if certain changes weren't made in 1997, then the company very well may have died. Essentially, I see the company as basically being re-built from scratch starting with the New Generation and RAW in 1993, through to about 1998 when they captured an entirely new audience with mostly brand new talent. Hogan was the foundation, but the foundation crumbled, and I see the renaissance as being equally as important.
That's all fair. And since Hogan was decently known prior to entering WWF, he didn't even necessarily "make" Hogan so much as he gave him his niche.
It had to be because the WWF/Vince were screwed up by the steroid allegations. Add on top of that, they were losing top main eventers like Hogan, Warrior, and Flair in that same time frame. Savage, Dibiase and Perfect had injuries of their own, and guys like Roberts and Rude left for WCW. So they really had no other choice but to rebuild. It took a while but Bret Hart became a huge star and helped sell the shows. It only took until mid 1996 to really start kick in the engine again, and guys like Hart, Michaels, and Taker were leading the way with new (albeit proven) talent from WCW/ECW coming over in Foley, Austin, Goldust, Pillman, and Vader.Essentially, I see the company as basically being re-built from scratch starting with the New Generation and RAW in 1993, through to about 1998 when they captured an entirely new audience with mostly brand new talent. Hogan was the foundation, but the foundation crumbled, and I see the renaissance as being equally as important.
Didn't he admit to taking roids in the 80s when he was on trial for pushing them onto wrestlers?
You should read the interview he did with the government during the investigation after the whole Chris Benoit incident. They ask him multiple times if he ever took steroids and if he had to adhere to the same wellness policy that he enforced on his wrestlers and he dodges the question like a pro. :lol
Any link? Vince's business acumen is fun to study.
Punk doesn't have it in him to do what Austin did and I'm a fan of punk. Austin just has more charisma. Even as a kid when I watch WCW at late nights the Hollywood Blondes was a team I wanted to watch even though as a kid I didn't understand why. Then I watched him in ECW and even and Austin was angrier there and this made him even better. Then he finally heads to WWE and had the dolla man managing him even though he doesn't need it and this builds more anger in Austin. Stone Cold is just Austin exaggerated and based on what he has gone through in his career up until that KotR promo. The Rock, Bad ass Taker, and the Game version of Triple H, and Foley were all similar exaggerated versions of the guys type of characters.
The closest thing the WWE had to a modern day Austin was Ryder who campaigned like crazy and connected with the fans on his own terms. Of course the WWE squashed him for it.
I think one of the big Roadblocks to Punk becoming Massive like Hogan/Austin/Rock is his size. He doesn't pass the eye test.