• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

How long are gamers gonna take it?

mclem said:
Which in turn means that the cost of development needs to come down. A lot. Which means sacrifices have to be made somewhere.

Or publishers need to direct that development cost towards a larger, less fought over audience.
 
bdizzle said:
I meant games people actually care about. I think we'll be able to survive without the PC exclusive juggernaut New Star Soccer 5 lol.

My brain has just thought about a hypothetical SpaceChem DS, and now it's sad that it doesn't exist.
 
bdizzle said:
I meant games people actually care about. I think we'll be able to survive without the PC exclusive juggernaut New Star Soccer 5 lol.

newstasoccer5.jpg

Holy Shit!

That game looks fun as hell! Sensible Soccer for a new generation.

http://newstarsoccer.newstargames.com/

I just registered for the trial, coming out in August.
 
Don't have an issue with a lot of the stuff you mentioned. I've enjoyed a ton of games each year and next year looks even more crazy.

I agree more new IP's are needed but I'm sure they'll come.

If your on the PC side then sure, I could see how you would be more upset. But some of the stuff, like charging 60, is developers trying to earn more money on a platform more known for piracy.
 
Vinci said:
Or publishers need to direct that development cost towards a larger, less fought over audience.

The OP implies that that's sacrificing their integrity and game quality.
 
just martyred myself. all your problems are over. please pay tribute to my sacrifice every 6th of july for the next 5000 years. i accept paypal donations.
 
Grisby said:
Don't have an issue with a lot of the stuff you mentioned. I've enjoyed a ton of games each year and next year looks even more crazy.

I agree more new IP's are needed but I'm sure they'll come.

If your on the PC side then sure, I could see how you would be more upset. But some of the stuff, like charging 60, is developers trying to earn more money on a platform more known for piracy.
if that's what they are doing it's a terrible idea, because it's forcing those of us that legally buy our games to spend more, or to buy less games, while doing absolutely nothing to discourage piracy.

increasing the price of something is either going to keep piracy levels about the same, or make them worse.

but, i am wholly unconvinced that is the reason for selling certain PC games at $60.

piracy is regularly the excuse, but i think it's very rarely the actual reason.
 
You forgot the belittling of the act of gameplay itself and self-betterment by most forces in development now, but the LCD comment kinda covered that.
 
Grisby said:
If your on the PC side then sure, I could see how you would be more upset.

There are more new IPs released on PC in a month than on the consoles in a damn year.

But some of the stuff, like charging 60, is developers trying to earn more money on a platform more known for piracy.

What an absolutely insane concept. I hope publishers don't really buy into this line of thinking, because it's bonkers.
 
OP, post pics of you buying original non-sequel games or just fess up that you didnt buy any because you just assumed they do not exist this generation.
 
Sadly the problem is us as consumers. None of those things would exist if people didn't support them. I make an effort to support companies with better business practices, not just with video games but with everything, but for a lot of people that's too much of a bother. *shrug*
 
Hey, change sucks, and it's especially hard when your demographic is less important than ever. I'm actually kind of happy to see AAA developers experimenting with ways to continue bringing us the sorts of games we like to play. Budgets had sort of reached a critical mass. Something had to give.

Not every experiment is successful, but at least the message hasn't been "shoot the core!" I mean casual games are printing money - not as a rule, many fail, but there's far less risk built into the development of a casual game. Whereas, one AAA flop can put a smaller developer in the ground.

Anyway, I'm with smokydave back on p. 1. I play iOS and Steam. I only have about a dozen PS3 games, and I've gone from being a 3-console gamer last generation to not having much interest in ever picking up a Wii or 360 (though I do envy the 360's arcade market, most of those games eventually hit PSN or Steam). I can see why the situation would be frustrating to someone who still focuses on big console games exclusively, especially when compared against the last generation, when huge developers were falling all over each other for our dollars.

Bentendo said:
If Valve/Steam did close shop, would we lose access to all of our games?

Valve stated several years ago that they'd distribute no-Steam patches for every game they possibly can if they ever have to shut Steam down.
 
I haven't turned any of my consoles on for anything but movie watching/netflix since the holidays, I doubt I will ever turn them on for gaming again. Although I'm not mad about it like the OP, I'm kind of really apathetic. Like, "meh, I was wasting too much time with that shit anyway."

The only thing I play anymore is PC Sims and Paradox games.
 
Shambles said:
Sadly the problem is us as consumers. None of those things would exist if people didn't support them. I make an effort to support companies with better business practices, not just with video games but with everything, but for a lot of people that's too much of a bother. *shrug*
i love whistle blowers like you. they stop game companies from taking things too far.

in the meantime i get to just play any game i want and enjoy it. that might be selfish. it might be shallow... but really i have faith in the gaming community to 'do the right thing' even if i rarely ever do myself.

still, the one boycott i did, i stuck to absolutely, and only stopped when the one thing i said would stop my boycott actually happened.

03/03/04 through to 07/15/09 i didn't give Lucasarts a penny of my money.

but project $10 doesn't effect me, because i buy my games new, and mostly on PC where they can't be resold.

DLC, on disk, not on disk, whatever doesn't effect me, because as far as i can see base games still offer great value for the most part, and the worries of base games being neutered for the sake of selling DLC hasn't come to pass, and would i think generate a significant outcry if anyone tried such a thing.

pre-order bonus stuff doesn't bother me, because i usually pre-order. heck, a lot of that stuff just makes the game easier than its supposed to anyway, and i often don't bother with it.
 
Vinci said:
There are more new IPs released on PC in a month than on the consoles in a damn year.
I guess if you take the entire breadth of PC gaming, including indies and hobbyists and compare that to only the console games advertised on television, then yeah, I could see you coming to this conclusion.

Otherwise, by making such wildly inaccurate sensationalist claims, you're just making a mockery of PC gamers.
 
Princess Skittles said:
I guess if you take the entire breadth of PC gaming, including indies and hobbyists and compare that to only the console games advertised on television, then yeah, I could see you coming to this conclusion.

Otherwise, by making such wildly inaccurate sensationalist claims, you're just making a mockery of PC gamers.
he is including games at Kongregate as well.
 
bdizzle said:
I meant games people actually care about. I think we'll be able to survive without the PC exclusive juggernaut New Star Soccer 5 lol.

newstasoccer5.jpg

So games need a $50 million budget for people to 'care' about them? Frozen Synapse and SpaceChem are two of the best games released this year and they have absolutely awful graphics.
 
Grisby said:
Don't have an issue with a lot of the stuff you mentioned. I've enjoyed a ton of games each year and next year looks even more crazy.

I agree more new IP's are needed but I'm sure they'll come.

If your on the PC side then sure, I could see how you would be more upset. But some of the stuff, like charging 60, is developers trying to earn more money on a platform more known for piracy.

You really believe that don't you lol
 
Darklord said:
Game crash of 2015. Then someone will make a new console, miles ahead of anything we have seen and will enter into the second golden age of gaming.
A second golden age would be awesome!


Grisby said:
If your on the PC side then sure, I could see how you would be more upset. But some of the stuff, like charging 60, is developers trying to earn more money on a platform more known for piracy.
*facepalm*
 
bdizzle said:
You really believe that don't you lol
Didn't you know? Piracy on PC never existed until this console generation! Don't copy that floppy? WTF is that?

Hooray for revisionist history!
 
Archie said:
So games need a $50 million budget for people to 'care' about them? Frozen Synapse and SpaceChem are two of the best games released this year and they have absolutely awful graphics.

No, I enjoyed the hell out of drop 7 on my iPhone,, that game probably had a $4,000 budget. The point was there isn't enough PC exclusives to warrant me (any many other people) making it my only platform. If I had to pick 1 system for all of my gaming needs. PC would be my last choice.
 
Princess Skittles said:
I guess if you take the entire breadth of PC gaming, including indies and hobbyists and compare that to only the console games advertised on television, then yeah, I could see you coming to this conclusion.

Otherwise, by making such wildly inaccurate sensationalist claims, you're just making a mockery of PC gamers.

It was meant as exaggeration, but there are significantly more new IPs in PC gaming than console gaming.

bdizzle said:
No, I enjoyed the hell out of drop 7 on my iPhone,, that game probably had a $4,000 budget. The point was there isn't enough PC exclusives to warrant me (any many other people) making it my only platform. If I had to pick 1 system for all of my gaming needs. PC would be my last choice.

You're like Bizarro Vinci. That's fine.
 
Icarus said:
I strongly disagree with the OP. There's so many choices now and games are better than they've ever been. It's sad some people focus only on the negative.
I don't know... I think one of the best games that I played this year was Beyond Good and Evil HD and I'm most excited about Shadow/ICO collection.
 
Archie said:
So games need a $50 million budget for people to 'care' about them? Frozen Synapse and SpaceChem are two of the best games released this year and they have absolutely awful graphics.

I think FS looks nice. Has a charm to it.
 
This is the list where I agree on these things being fucking stupid:

MMaRsu said:
-Online passes
-Horrible DRM systems
-Streamlining and "casualizing" great franchises
-Pre-order exclusives
-Less creativity in games and everybody looks to MW for inspiration on how to get that casual $$$

Also this list is missing "Pre-Order exclusives that depend on where you buy the game, thus you'll never get the "full" game, because something will always be missing or it'll be DLC that will cost 5$/€ or more per item, thus making you pay 75 bucks for a 50$/€ game".
Because this is the absolute worst. THE WORST!!!


Then this is the list where I think "Meh, it could be much worse, like, you know, the list above":

MMaRsu said:
-RLOD/YLOD
-Dev's lying about not implementing features
-Publishers lying about so much
-Reboots for games that certainly don't need reboots.
I don't mind reboots at all. They can be good, like Mortal Kombat or A Boy And His Blob for example. Of course, they can also suck ass, like (probably) DmC or...yeah, that's about it. Haven't seen THAT much reboots this gen, really. They totally flew over my head.
The "Lights of Death"...yeah well, my PS3 is still alive and kicking, my 360 has been replaced at no cost at all so...yeah, I don't really care for now. I know I will be angry if it happens to me and I'll have to pay a bajillion bucks to get my console repaired for which I payed 400 bucks+, but for now...nah.
Publishers lying about features and everything in general is nothing new. It's been done since the olden days of the NES. "THE ARCADE GAME! ON YOUR NES! OH WAIT IT'S A CHOPPED DOWN PORT! WELL, TOUGH LUCK, KID!" It's always been there. It's just more recognizable nowadays because developers don't even try to hide their lies anymore. Remember, Kotick hates videogames, he's only doing it for the money. Like prostitution! Only less contagious!


And here's the list that makes me go "Wait, what?":

MMaRsu said:
-Motion controls being touted as next big thing ( welcome to 5 years ago MS/Sony )
-PC games not supporting adjusting your FOV/30fps caps.
Motion controls, yeah well, I haven't seen many games that FORCE you to use motion controls. And even then I WOULDN'T PLAY THEM! Developers will see someday that less than 15% of all games that have both motion and traditional controls will be played with motion controls which is a small enough number to just throw motion controls out altogether.
As for FOV adjustment: What? Is it THAT much of a deal? I mean, seriously, what? I never adjust my FOV. Because in no game I ever played I COULD adjust my FOV, outside of the developer console at least. Is this really that much of deal to be angry about? Or is this just the jaywalking part in an "Arson, Murder and Jaywalking" post?
Though yeah, I don't quite like a 30 fps cap, but I'm not really bitching about it either. I can live with 30 fps, as long as it's not a genre, where 60 fps are practically an absolute must, like Fighting games or other genres that require frame perfect timing.
 
echoshifting said:
Hey, change sucks, and it's especially hard when your demographic is less important than ever.

I was *livid* in the midnineties when that upstart Sony came in with casual games full of blood 'n' gore just to appeal to gamers who *weren't me*. And they had the audacity to be *successful* at it, too. The bastards!

I have since... moved on. But the rants here are *eerily* remeniscent of the nonsense I was spouting back then.
 
Every week it seems GAF gets more negative and serious (and elitist). It's depressing because I don't enjoy coming here as much as I used to.
 
Bjoern the Smexy said:
As for FOV adjustment: What? Is it THAT much of a deal? I mean, seriously, what? I never adjust my FOV. Because in no game I ever played I COULD adjust my FOV, outside of the developer console at least. Is this really that much of deal to be angry about? Or is this just the jaywalking part in an "Arson, Murder and Jaywalking" post?
Though yeah, I don't quite like a 30 fps cap, but I'm not really bitching about it either. I can live with 30 fps, as long as it's not a genre, where 60 fps are practically an absolute must, like Fighting games or other genres that require frame perfect timing.
Yes it's a big deal. I have issues playing a lot of FPS games if I can't set my FOV to 90. I literally can't play the game. It's a huge deal.
 
plagiarize said:
still, the one boycott i did, i stuck to absolutely, and only stopped when the one thing i said would stop my boycott actually happened.

03/03/04 through to 07/15/09 i didn't give Lucasarts a penny of my money.

From the dates... Lamenting the lack of a new Lucasarts-funded adventure? Probably triggered by the cancellation of Sam & Max? Relieved by the announcement of TOMI?
 
0-day/3month/Disk DLC pisses me of so much I don't even buy the game if its devs do that. Really wanted to play MvC3..so I rented it. would have preordered it otherwise.
 
This might really explain why indie games have been taking off so much lately. I own all the consoles and they used to be fun, but when I step back and look at them, I don't see much that I care for on them any longer. Sure I see a game here and there, but stuff like what XBL has become has me disenfranchised. I don't have to pay to play on my PC, PS3, or Wii. How come it takes me 10 minutes to figure out how to simply launch a game even if it is as easy as pushing up twice. Why are there ads all over my screen? How come I have to punch in a 50 digit code to see a friend? Why do all my brand new games have DLC waiting to be bought the day they release? Why not just toss it on the game before you ship it? The thing already cost me $60, you're not getting another penny!

While Microsoft and Sony are playing catch up to the Wii, Nintendo has already moved on and has gone back to a normal controller, albeit an uber one with a freaking color touch screen. Something all us Dreamcast owners once dreamed of.

I see Minecraft, Terarria, Star Ruler, Dredmor and I see some great indie games that are made for the love of making games. No huge budgets, but they have more soul in them than all the current console games combined.

I have hopes that the next generation everything is free, all networking, all patches, all DLC. It will probably be the only thing that will make me buy the next systems.

We all know it wont happen. So sad.
 
If you put the incredible, rapidly-growing indie game scene onto the plate, this gen looks a helluva lot better in terms of creativity and ambition. The AAA(hate that goofy term) scene has gotten a little too business-y for it's own good, but there's also distinct highlights every year, and development teams who do forward-thinking, creative stuff even with gigantic budgets(Bioshock, Assassin's Creed). To be fair though, this is probably the most exceptional generation for obsessive branding and me-too strategies. But why wouldn't it be: We have shown time and time again that we will not buy brand new IPs.

Voting with your wallet is not stupid, it is the most direct and effective way to control the industry: Companies sell video games to make money. If we don't spend on money on things we don't like, they won't make those things anymore. Simple as that. The failure here lies with the gaming community, who is quicker than any other media community to whine, but slower to actually do something if it's difficult or inconvenient in any way. All respect due to you 1% or 2% that actually stand by boycotts, but for the most part, the gaming community near unanimously buys exactly what the publishers tell them they want, regardless of what they're upset about. We even go so far as to create an emotional tie of brand loyalty towards business entities who's only purpose is to coerce us into giving them as much money as possible.
 
Philthy said:
This might really explain why indie games have been taking off so much lately. I own all the consoles and they used to be fun, but when I step back and look at them, I don't see much that I care for on them any longer. Sure I see a game here and there, but stuff like what XBL has become has me disenfranchised. I don't have to pay to play on my PC, PS3, or Wii. How come it takes me 10 minutes to figure out how to simply launch a game even if it is as easy as pushing up twice. Why are there ads all over my screen? How come I have to punch in a 50 digit code to see a friend? Why do all my brand new games have DLC waiting to be bought the day they release? Why not just toss it on the game before you ship it? The thing already cost me $60, you're not getting another penny!

While Microsoft and Sony are playing catch up to the Wii, Nintendo has already moved on and has gone back to a normal controller, albeit an uber one with a freaking color touch screen. Something all us Dreamcast owners once dreamed of.

I see Minecraft, Terarria, Star Ruler, Dredmor and I see some great indie games that are made for the love of making games. No huge budgets, but they have more soul in them than all the current console games combined.

I have hopes that the next generation everything is free, all networking, all patches, all DLC. It will probably be the only thing that will make me buy the next systems.

We all know it wont happen. So sad.


Ah not all console devs are going this way. Lightbox have said they won't start thinking about the DLC until Starhawk is released. Demon's Souls never got a DLC even despite popular demand and even if Dark Souls gets DLC it won't be the exploitive kind.

Dare I say even CoD keeps it good.They do overcharge for the maps, but there's no 0-day on disk BS. This is at least one area that makes it better than BF3 (EA) for me already.

I don't ever see exploitve DLC crap going away..at least until console gaming is king.
 
Billychu said:
Yes it's a big deal. I have issues playing a lot of FPS games if I can't set my FOV to 90. I literally can't play the game. It's a huge deal.
Is it a motion sickness issue? An FOV of 90 is just a bit too high for my tastes and starts to crawl into fisheye territory.

Of course, photography is a hobby of mine so I pay close attention to framing and am willing to give up a bit of peripheral view in order display a more attractive scene. I don't always enjoy a narrow FOV, but I don't think it's necessary to display a wide FOV in all cases either.

Now, if a narrow FOV causes motion sickness, then I can understand the concern. This is an issue for a friend of mine as well with some games becoming virtually impossible to enjoy as a result.
 
Dr. Zoidberg said:
Every week it seems GAF gets more negative and serious (and elitist). It's depressing because I don't enjoy coming here as much as I used to.

The more elitist I get, the more I enjoy games. No joke, it's great.
 
MMaRsu said:
-Online passes

What's wrong with this? What's so wrong about a developer enticing people to buy new games?

-Horrible DRM systems

Speaking from personal experience, i have yet to have a problem with DRM. Experiences may vary.

-RLOD/YLOD

Electronics tend to brake. MS screwed up at the beginning, but their customer serviced picked up and they extended the warranty for all launch consoles 3 years. At no cost. Its not the most optimal situation, but they stood by the customer in most cases.

-
Streamlining and "casualizing" great franchises

You would rather have franchises that don't sell and make no money. Good chief. Not everyone has your fine taste in games.

-Pre-order exclusives

Do not blame the industry, blame how capitalism works. The more they can show their stockholders how good a game will sell before release the more likely they can get more investors for the next. Also pre-orders, if used effectively, can allow a publisher to determine how many copies hit the market.

-Less creativity in games and everybody looks to MW for inspiration on how to get that casual $$$

As it was mentioned. There are indie games that may fit your great palate.

-Dev's lying about not implementing features

uh?

-Publishers lying about so much

This is new?

-Motion controls being touted as next big thing ( welcome to 5 years ago MS/Sony )

They can't do marketing for new products? Do you know how marketing works?

-PC games not supporting adjusting your FOV/30fps caps.

I can understand this.

-Developing for the lowest common denominator.

Sorry to hear that only your kind of people are meant to enjoy games.

-Reboots for games that certainly don't need reboots.

Don't buy them.
 
params7 said:
0-day/3month/Disk DLC pisses me of so much I don't even buy the game if its devs do that. Really wanted to play MvC3..so I rented it. would have preordered it otherwise.
If it's any consolation, Shuma-Gorath and Jill are both pretty lame.
 
Gamers can quit anytime. I'm quiting once the sun finally sets on the PS3 and 360, I'll still have a huge backload to go through and other games I'd like to replay.

I'm not saying everything for this gen has been great, not a fan of some of the ridiculous DLC offerings, the console failures (though that really started last gen). I'm not seeing the whole streamlining thing everyone else is scared of, dudebro shooters are still popular and like everything else, its time will wane. I think its impossible for the jaded cynical game to appreciate the gen they are currently in, I've never seen it happen, at least not in the internet age anyway. The general consensus is now the PS2/GC/Xbox gen was awesome, prior to next gen becoming this gen, the PS2 era supposedly sucked. People longed for the halcyon days of the PS1/N64 days, but during its prime, it sucked compared to the SNES/Genesis days. I'm sure if the internets were then what they were now, people would have bitched about the 16 bit gen, complaining about cartidge costs, a never ending glut of SFII and Mario/Sonic ripoffs. The gaming collective never seems to be satisfied with what they currently have. For me its a good time to bail.
 
Every hobby has has some kind of bullshit thing or situation people have to endure. Thats because theres the business man, the gamer, culturally barriers, but whatever nothing is perfect. Lets not forget all those great memories playing co-op with friends, setting down to a great single player experience, or studying the different, but all wonderful, disciplines that make your favorite games possible.
 
truly101 said:
Gamers can quit anytime. I'm quiting once the sun finally sets on the PS3 and 360, I'll still have a huge backload to go through and other games I'd like to replay.

I'm not saying everything for this gen has been great, not a fan of some of the ridiculous DLC offerings, the console failures (though that really started last gen). I'm not seeing the whole streamlining thing everyone else is scared of, dudebro shooters are still popular and like everything else, its time will wane. I think its impossible for the jaded cynical game to appreciate the gen they are currently in, I've never seen it happen, at least not in the internet age anyway. The general consensus is now the PS2/GC/Xbox gen was awesome, prior to next gen becoming this gen, the PS2 era supposedly sucked. People longed for the halcyon days of the PS1/N64 days, but during its prime, it sucked compared to the SNES/Genesis days. I'm sure if the internets were then what they were now, people would have bitched about the 16 bit gen, complaining about cartidge costs, a never ending glut of SFII and Mario/Sonic ripoffs. The gaming collective never seems to be satisfied with what they currently have. For me its a good time to bail.


It's cyclical. Damned near everything is, and it repeats and repeats the same as the sun rises and sets and rises again.
 
Wessiej said:
And look at the damn games that are coming out in 2011. Best...ever....your opinion is wrong.

2011 is looking to be an year of ass games. I don't think there's one new game confirmed for this year that I'm legitimately excited about, there are some I'm interested in or keeping an eye out but nothing truly exciting.

Anyways, OP it'll only get worse. Just like Capcom's bullshit with SFIV and now the soon to be Super MvC3. Companies are greedy, money hungry assholes and they will never change instead shit will get even worse because people are stupid.
 
Ezalc said:
2011 is looking to be an year of ass games. I don't think there's one new game confirmed for this year that I'm legitimately excited about, there are some I'm interested in or keeping an eye out but nothing truly exciting.

Anyways, OP it'll only get worse. Just like Capcom's bullshit with SFIV and now the soon to be Super MvC3. Companies are greedy, money hungry assholes and they will never change instead shit will get even worse because people are stupid.
That's a damn shame then, 'cuz it's one of the best years in gaming. It looks to be right up there with 1998, 2001, 2004, and 2007. If none of the games being released this year appeal then perhaps the hobby is no longer for you. I'm a collector of retro games as well and enjoy them immensely, but I also appreciate the new games being released.
 
I can only hope that those myopic gluttonous wretches who look down at adrian werner's list and see nothing that could aptly replace the sour, infected milk that they've been suckling from the blistered teat of the AAA console hag for so many years can find their way out of my hobby sooner rather than later.
 
dark10x said:
That's a damn shame then, 'cuz it's one of the best years in gaming. It looks to be right up there with 1998, 2001, 2004, and 2007. If none of the games being released this year appeal then perhaps the hobby is no longer for you. I'm a collector of retro games as well and enjoy them immensely, but I also appreciate the new games being released.

Whenever I see people talk about "quitting" gaming, I only really see people talking about quitting the act of buying new games.

It can still be a hobby without that.
 
Top Bottom