• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

How much longer can the Wii U go without a price cut?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even with a price cut, you won't see "great" sales numbers.

The system is a niche system. The casuals that bought the Wii have moved on to gaming on their iphone/ipad + android. That leaves nothing but the Nintendo faithful to buy their system. They will see dismal sales for the rest of the gen. They are nichetendo.
 
An optical output would've been pretty nice as well, but y'know, cheapo Nintendo.

Edit: All I know is I've got until the end of next month to do a price/promo match, so let's get going with a price drop, or free gift card/game offer dammit! Sick of seeing the Xbox 360 in every sales ad!

I have no idea how they're actually losing money on the thing considering how many corners were cut. The tablet controller must cost a boatload.
 
$250

DO IT IWATA

I don't think they really can go that low. It would kill them. They are already taking a hit on the hardware, selling at a loss.

It was different with the 3DS, they cockily overpriced the thing because they thought the reaction to it at E3 meant people would pay the high price.

I can see a $299 deluxe as the limit of a price drop on Wii U right now. Honestly though, it seems to me that the Wii U is in for a rough battle this holiday. In addition to the new consoles, its also going to be competing with (most likely) dirt cheap PS3 and 360 bundles as well as their own 3DS and Pokemon.

In my opinion, I don't think the 'onslaught' of titles people keep talking about are going to help much. There just isn't anything that exciting to me in the lineup.
 
By October 2013:
1. Patch in pro controller support for games that don't need the second screen.
2. Release $199 core system with pro controller but no tablet controller.
3. Sell tablet controller as $99 accessory, bundled with Nintendoland.
 
So you are saying that out of all the Wii's sold, most were not sold to people who also own a PS3 or 360? That most Wii's were sold to people who only buy Nintendo consoles?

Many consoles were sold to casual gamers who were interested in Wii Fit or Wii Sports, not in hardcore games.
 
So far the system is selling exactly at the rate of Dreamcast MoM therefore expect a price drop late August/September (followed by a mediocre boost in sales).
 
That's an added expense though. 32GB isn't enough if you want to buy digital, some of the games on eShop are over 10GB.

Deluxe + a 500GB external will cost you $400 basically, same as PS4... which is ridiculous.
Sure, but I was talking about a 299 32GB with a game preinstalled, or better, a retail game of your choice from the eshop. You can get a 500GB for 50 bucks or you might even already have one unused at home. Does the PS4 allows you to run games from an external HDD? I haven't seen any information about it yet.
 
By October 2013:
1. Patch in pro controller support for games that don't need the second screen.
2. Release $199 core system with pro controller but no tablet controller.
3. Sell tablet controller as $99 accessory, bundled with Nintendoland.

Pretty much what I think except Id keep a deluxe at $299 include a controller include Nintendo Land and Supermario WiiU preloaded.
 
Even with a price cut, you won't see "great" sales numbers.

The system is a niche system. The casualsthat bought the Wii have moved on to gaming on their iphone/ipad + android. That leaves nothing but the Nintendo faithful to buy their system. They will see dismal sales for the rest of the gen. They are nichetendo.

Didn't we agree not to use that word?
 
I would bet that most PS3/360 owner also bought a Wii and I really don't see this huge Nintendo ONLY audience that people talk about.

In other words, most gamers are Nintendo fans too.

I'm saying that Wii U is not the by and large primary choice for a gaming device in the market as it stands. It is having trouble competing with current gen devices, I don't even know how it will survive against next gen machines.

Not being the primary console choice is dangerous, if you can't get those customers right away then they may get another machine and never look back. Some do buy Wii U as a secondary console, but that is a terrible position to be in for Nintendo and I have no idea how you think that can at all help Wii U.

In terms of Nintendo Only audience, I don't think it exists. Nintendo diehards will get the Wii U as their first/primary console which I guess is good for Nintendo, but they won't stay entirely faithful to it and probably have another backup gaming device in place to play 3rd party games. Because this sounds like a fairly large commitment in terms of money I think even for Nintendo fans it is getting harder and harder to justify getting a Nintendo system as your first choice. Basically the "Wii U first" crowd is incredibly small and getting smaller.
 
The Wii U needs a price-cut sometime in September or October.

The system cannot drop its price too close to the PS4's launch. There needs to be a drop in correlation with games, along with enough time so that the drop can be marketed well alongside the game titles to drum up enough interest in potential consumers.
 
Didn't we agree not to use that word?
But it's accurate.

The word "casual" indicates that the games are produced for the casual consumer, who comes across the game and can get into gameplay almost immediately. Every month, an estimated 200 million consumers play casual games online,[4] many of whom do not normally regard themselves as gamers, or fans of video games.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casual_game
 
$279.99 Deluxe

in this color:

nintendo%20wii%20blue%20konsol.jpg


NOA, are you listening?
 
Watch Dogs is made for the GamePad. I didn't say anything about it being better looking, I said a better experience. You may be able to replicate the gameplay using a PS4 and Vita, or a One and Smartglass but it remains to be seen whether Sony and Microsoft have integrated those control options lag free, plus you've got to already own or buy the Vita/tablet/smartphone to make that improved gameplay possible.
You've stumbled on another problem Nintendo is up against: the overlap between the console market and the smartphone/tablet market is probably close to 100%. I don't need the WiiU screen because my household has an iPad, two Nook HD+, a Galaxy S3, a Razr M, a Droid 2, and an iPhone 3GS. Anyone in the US with a smartphone also likely takes advantage of upgrade cycles, meaning more and more old but perfectly functional smartphones in households.

3rd parties are almost certainly going to tailor second-screen gaming to smartphone-esque devices. The WiiU may get those too but those games will have the experience hobbled by expectations of non-dedicated hardware.
 
Even if they cut the price by $100 (not even glancing at it if they only cut by $50) the console is still a very tough sell IMO. They need to do more than that.
 
Sure, but I was talking about a 299 32GB with a game preinstalled, or better, a retail game of your choice from the eshop. You can get a 500GB for 50 bucks or you might even already have one unused at home. Does the PS4 allows you to run games from an external HDD? I haven't seen any information about it yet.

Haven't seen anything said on this either, but the HDD in PS4 is user-replaceable like the PS3 and you can use any off the shelf HDD.
 
By October 2013:
1. Patch in pro controller support for games that don't need the second screen.
2. Release $199 core system with pro controller but no tablet controller.
3. Sell tablet controller as $99 accessory, bundled with Nintendoland.

They are never going to sell it without the tablet. It IS the system.
 
I believe that Nintendo will not drop the price of the console from $350.00, but will change the pack-in game to New Super Mario Bros U.

The $400 PS4 does not include a game, so saying that $350 vs $400 is not really fair once you also buy a game for PS4 for $60. It is more like $350 vs $460. If Nintendo did lower the price to $300 with New Super Mario Bros U, that might be possible under the expectation of most people also buying the Luigi DLC.
 
The Wii U needs a price-cut sometime in September or October.

The system cannot drop its price too close to the PS4's launch. There needs to be a drop in correlation with games, along with enough time so that the drop can be marketed well alongside the game titles to drum up enough interest in potential consumers.

The drop definitely needs to happen befor the PS4 and Xbone release. If they drop the price afterwards it's going to loo like a desperate attempt to capture attention.
 
"Many" were also sold to gamers.
Other games sold very well on this system and you know it.

True. But it's no secret that the casual market made the Wii the success it is and not the PS3/360 audience. That's also why the Wii U is the failure it is. The casual audience has moved on to iOS and Android, with Nintendo not giving any incentive to buy the Wii U. All they do is provide sequels that look pretty much identical like the Wii or 3DS iterations. The sales of NSMB U already illustrated that such safe sequels don't set the sales on fire.

The Wii U needs to provide something that makes it a desired item. The current lineup does not provide anything special, it's just more of the same with Nintendo not showing the benefits of the Wii U Gamepad.
 
I believe that Nintendo will not drop the price of the console from $350.00, but will change the pack-in game to New Super Mario Bros U.

The $400 PS4 does not include a game, so saying that $350 vs $400 is not really fair once you also buy a game for PS4 for $60. It is more like $350 vs $460. If Nintendo did lower the price to $300 with New Super Mario Bros U, that might be possible under the expectation of most people also buying the Luigi DLC.

The $400 PS4 does include a HDD though, something that will make up the $50 if you buy one for the Wii U .
 
I don't think that a price cut alone will help. They need to get some developers back on board and develop some goddamn online games if they want the average joe to have any interest in the platform.
 
The $400 PS4 does include a HDD though, something that will make up the $50 if you buy one for the Wii U .

It also includes hardware that is over 4x as powerful and actual 3rd party support. Oh and decent online infrastructure. Nintendo is WAY too backwards right now. Its 2013, not 2002. This company needs to wake up fast.
 
I believe that Nintendo will not drop the price of the console from $350.00, but will change the pack-in game to New Super Mario Bros U.

The $400 PS4 does not include a game, so saying that $350 vs $400 is not really fair once you also buy a game for PS4 for $60. It is more like $350 vs $460.

So for an extra $100 I'm getting a system that will be able to play the next generation of console games, have all of the big third party games I love, and a 500GB HDD? Sold!
 
The problem is not that much the PS4 and Xbox one. If anything, these console will rise interest in a console upgrade, and Wii U being cheaper will be considered by Wii owners who overlooked it so far.

The problem is more PS3 and x360 low price to entry. Wii U is losing its sales against these consoles.

The earlier the price drop, the better. $299 with The Wonderful 101, $279 with Zelda, Nintendo Land and Mario. Nintendo needs a price drop and bundles. Lots of them.
 
The problem is not that much the PS4 and Xbox one. If anything, these console will rise interest in a console upgrade, and Wii U being cheaper will be considered by Wii owners who overlooked it so far.

The problem is more PS3 and x360 low price to entry. Wii U is losing its sales against these consoles.

The earlier the price drop, the better. $299 with The Wonderful 101, $279 with Zelda, Nintendo Land and Mario. Nintendo needs a price drop and bundles. Lots of them.

Still way too expensive. Bundles with The Wonderful 101 won't help either as that game has little appeal outside of the hardcore Nintendo fans, especially as Nintendo is unwilling to do marketing for non-Mario, AC, or Pokemon titles.
 
Honestly, as insane as it sounds, I think they really are going to try to get through the year without a price cut. Pikmin 3 is supposed to kick off their one-a-month first-party game releases for the platform, so why would they not have paired a price cut with that if they intended to do it this year?

That said, Nintendo's Q1 earnings release is on July 31. They used that in 2011 to announce the 3DS price cut, so perhaps history will repeat itself, but otherwise, it's probably not happening. Blame the Game Pad for this; it's probably the biggest impairment to Nintendo's pricing flexibility.
 
Defending Nintendo for releasing the WiiU especially at that price point is akin to crackberry members defending RIM.
 
By October 2013:
1. Patch in pro controller support for games that don't need the second screen.
2. Release $199 core system with pro controller but no tablet controller.
3. Sell tablet controller as $99 accessory, bundled with Nintendoland.

Number 2 is never happening and would create an even bigger disaster. People need to stop pretending its feasible.
 
$100 price cut? The hell is wrong with some of you?

Drop the price of the deluxe to $300, drop the price of the basic to $250. There is no need at all for such a completely drastic cut like that. At $300 that makes the Wii U $100 less than the PS4 WITH A GAME packed in. That's very competitive and that's for the high end model, not even the low end.



Let's just make the 3DSXL $50 while we're at it! smh....
 
By October 2013:
1. Patch in pro controller support for games that don't need the second screen.
2. Release $199 core system with pro controller but no tablet controller.
3. Sell tablet controller as $99 accessory, bundled with Nintendoland.

the gamepad isnt a great draw but it's one their few needed draws. without it, in this scenario, it's an inferior ps3/360.
 
$100 price cut? The hell is wrong with some of you?

Drop the price of the deluxe to $300, drop the price of the basic to $250. There is no need at all for such a completely drastic cut like that. At $300 that makes the Wii U $100 less than the PS4 WITH A GAME packed in. That's very competitive and that's for the high end model, not even the low end.



Let's just make the 3DSXL $50 while we're at it! smh....

Yeah you're right. Retailers will cut the price further or offer some nice bundles (Just like they have done with the 3DS) so such a drastic cut probably is not needed.

But it'd be nice.
 
$100 price cut? The hell is wrong with some of you?

Drop the price of the deluxe to $300, drop the price of the basic to $250. There is no need at all for such a completely drastic cut like that. At $300 that makes the Wii U $100 less than the PS4 WITH A GAME packed in. That's very competitive and that's for the high end model, not even the low end.



Let's just make the 3DSXL $50 while we're at it! smh....

Again, sales of the Wii U remain sluggish even at €200/€250.
 
$100 price cut? The hell is wrong with some of you?

Drop the price of the deluxe to $300, drop the price of the basic to $250. There is no need at all for such a completely drastic cut like that. At $300 that makes the Wii U $100 less than the PS4 WITH A GAME packed in. That's very competitive and that's for the high end model, not even the low end.



Let's just make the 3DSXL $50 while we're at it! smh....

The Wiiu with 32GB of space being called high end is hilarious. And no one cares about nintendoland
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom