• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

I can't believe how bad Amazing Spider-Man 2 was

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL yeah, when spider-man said "your the bravest kid i know" i was thinking should he be saying, "hey kid, are you stupid or what?" and then to the officers behind him "hey you lot, are you all bloomin stupid?, you let a kid get past you??!".

Good thing that after six months, Spidey got back into action EXACTLY when Rhino got back into action, or that kid would've bought it
 
I dunno...it wasn't bad... but it wasn't good...

I probably won't watch it again though

It looked pretty though, got a bit of a neon Infamous SS feel during some parts.
 
Good thing that after six months, Spidey got back into action EXACTLY when Rhino got back into action, or that kid would've bought it

Perhaps there was a deleted scene in which they had someone spying on Peter, waiting for the time they thought "yep, he's ready to get back to being Spider-Man now" - then they called Rhino up and said "its TIME!!!"
 
Amazing cinematography / art direction / visual effects

But the rest... yeah. Convoluted is the word. And not in the right places.
 
Perhaps there was a deleted scene in which they had someone spying on Peter, waiting for the time they thought "yep, he's ready to get back to being Spider-Man now" - then they called Rhino up and said "its TIME!!!"

Nope. But there is a deleted scene where it turns out
Peter's dad was still alive and came to Peter to tell him to be Spider-Man while he was moping at Gwen's grave

Just the dumbest shit
 
Nope. But there is a deleted scene were it turns out
Peter's dad was still alive and came to Peter to tell him to be Spider-Man while he was moping at Gwen's grave

Just the dumbest shit
So that means
Peter's dad its Rhino's boss!!!!, Peter's dad called Rhino up afterwards and told him to start ripping it up and running down kids
- holy CRAP!!!!.
 
Nope. But there is a deleted scene were it turns out
Peter's dad was still alive and came to Peter to tell him to be Spider-Man while he was moping at Gwen's grave

Just the dumbest shit

I think that would've been great, cause then the director literally ripped off
MGS4
 
For me this topped Spider-man 3 as the worst Spidey film. I'm glad the birth of my daughter lead to this being a digital rental rather than something my wife and I spent $30 going to see in the theatre.
 
For me this topped Spider-man 3 as the worst Spidey film. I'm glad the birth of my daughter lead to this being a digital rental rather than something my wife and I spent $30 going to see in the theatre.

At least Spider-Man 3 has a really good opening fight between Peter and Harry.

ASM2 has a really good fight between the screenwriters and the audience's tolerance for terrible movies
 
I didn't hate it. I liked it more than the first mainly because I didn't really care for another origin story.

I like the casting. Garfield is better than dorky Tobey IMO. Gwen was really good. The guy who did Harry Osborn was creepy, but the Goblin design was ridiculous. Put a mask on that ugly mug. Rhino was pretty dumb, but so is he in the comics. Electro was good for the blow shit up moments.

There's plenty of flaws with these movies and they don't come even close to the Marvel flicks, but I think there's potential with the new Amazing movies. I really like Garfield and I like how they've moving ahead with the reboot. The Amazing movies are better than the McGuire movies IMO.
 
I will say this:
Gwen's death
was pretty well done/faithful to the comic. That's the only thing I liked in the entire movie.
Gwen spent the entire movie telling Peter she was a strong independent woman who can make her own decisions. They were intentionally trying to deflect the ambiguity from the comic
 
There's plenty of flaws with these movies and they don't come even close to the Marvel flicks, but I think there's potential with the new Amazing movies. I really like Garfield and I like how they've moving ahead with the reboot. The Amazing movies are better than the McGuire movies IMO.

This is what annoys me about the 2 ASM movies, you can watch them both and see so much potential with Spider-man himself and a lot of the action scenes, its just let down in pretty much every other area. Its just ripe for a fantastic live action ASM, they just need to keep the action/design as it is now and put a lot of work into the actual stores to make it all work.
 
I thought the first one was absolute trash; but I thought the second one was the perfect live action adaptation of Spider-Man. I had no idea people thought this poorly of the movie until I looked up the threads here.

That's not to say it's not a perfect movie; the Green Goblin's makeup was terrible and the movie didn't need air traffic controller drama, but I wouldn't even think of viewing it in a negative light.
 
Dane Dehaan's acting is so fucking horrible and completely doesn't work in the role of Harry Osborne.
I disagree. You can see he got the role because of his Chronicle performance, and I think he plays a fine villain.

James Franco was a terrible Harry Osborn. This new guy is a significant upgrade IMO.
 
Yep, REALLY REALLY want SONY to just give it to Marvel and let them do good by it, pretty bad film.
Best way to describe ASM2 : romantic chick flick with some action in-between.

Kinda sad.
 
Marvel should get the rights back am I right guys?

Who the hell did the first 2 spidermans. Give it back to THEM. Marvel hasnt ever had to do a Spiderman movie so I dont really know why we would want to give it to them and pray instead of just the guys who did it right the first two times.
 
Who the hell did the first 2 spidermans. Give it back to THEM. Marvel hasnt ever had to do a Spiderman movie so I dont really know why we would want to give it to them and pray instead of just the guys who did it right the first two times.

Sony did the first two! More specifically Sam Raimi. But it was still the same production company
 
One thing that made me laugh was when I saw that the Bluray is advertising 12 deleted scenes as a selling point.

To me, the fact that 12 scenes ended up on the cutting floor says a lot about this movie's problems.
 
Who the hell did the first 2 spidermans. Give it back to THEM. Marvel hasnt ever had to do a Spiderman movie so I dont really know why we would want to give it to them and pray instead of just the guys who did it right the first two times.

The guy who did the first 2 did the third and for that I wouldn't want Raimi back. I think Garfield was a perfect casting choice but the way they write him is awful.
 
One thing that made me laugh was when I saw that the Bluray is advertising 12 deleted scenes as a selling point.

To me, the fact that 12 scenes ended up on the cutting floor says a lot about this movie's problems.

The final product has the distinct honor of being both completely bloated and being filled with nothing at the exact same time
 
Agreed. ASM1 was terrible, but ASM2 took it to a new level. I grew up loving Spiderman, but think I will skip the next movie even though the Raimi ones were good (1 doesn't hold up as well as I had thought it would, and 3 was not as bad as I remembered it).

It's amazing that CA2 and DoFP were both so good and then ASM2 was just a sick mangy dog's fart in the wind.
 
It was as bad as Spiderman 3 but lacked the charm that Raimi's version had. They tried making Electro a Raimi villain but failed at the execution, which was a shame because I liked Jamie Foxx's efforts.
 
It makes me so fucking mad, because the reboot had so much potential and they waste it on such shitty plot.

Andrew shits on Toby, and Emma shits on Kirsten.

They just put their awesome chemistry on a shitty backdrop. Like, it gets me legitimately upset.
 
I watched Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 a couple of weekends ago and I think Spider-Man 2 is probably still the best superhero movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom