wonderkins
Member
If I had kids, I'd give my first born to see The Beatles perform at the Cavern Club.
akira28 said:Beatles are genius and I don't feel inclined to defend them to you, but I will say that they had a pop-crooner phase, a pop-rock phase, and a psychedelic phase where they basically caused the entire industry to respond in order to compete for relevance. Without the tension between the Rolling Stones and the Beatles there's no way to tell how rock would be today. So partially the Beatles popularity is a result of their skill and their place in history.
Kaijima said:Regardless of whether you can develop a taste for their music today, their legacy is more about the bombshell impact they had, much like Elvis Presley or even Michael Jackson. The Beatles were arguably more important than either of them, because their biggest contributions where in the technical and exploratory side. You hear the Beatles without hearing them, in the music of countless other artists who followed them.
Well said.akira28 said:Beatles are genius and I don't feel inclined to defend them to you, but I will say that they had a pop-crooner phase, a pop-rock phase, and a psychedelic phase where they basically caused the entire industry to respond in order to compete for relevance. Without the tension between the Rolling Stones and the Beatles there's no way to tell how rock would be today. So partially the Beatles popularity is a result of their skill and their place in history.
ChackanKun said:Oh god I thought I was alone in this!
Altough "Hey Jude" is a great song, most of TB songs are quite generic and not that catchy.
MadraptorMan said:One very important thing makes The Beatles better than Presley and Jackson: they wrote their own music. Sure they played lots of covers in their early years, but when they branched off into their own creativity, that's when the real magic happened.
Gustav said:Both did as well. Jackson even quite a bit.
Everything's generic 50 years into the future, when it has influenced so much in popular music.Shogun PaiN said:The Beatles are/were generic?
Some bad opinions in this thread.
akira28 said:Beatles are genius and I don't feel inclined to defend them to you, but I will say that they had a pop-crooner phase, a pop-rock phase, and a psychedelic phase where they basically caused the entire industry to respond in order to compete for relevance. Without the tension between the Rolling Stones and the Beatles there's no way to tell how rock would be today. So partially the Beatles popularity is a result of their skill and their place in history.
In mono. So good.WyndhamPrice said:My solution to this question is Sgt. fucking Pepper.
just heard, nice guitar. rest is regular. more besides op:Gustav said:No. None of those are better than Strawberry Fields.
From "Off The Wall" and on he wrote at least half, or so, of the songs on his albums with that number increasing as time went on.MadraptorMan said:Wasn't the bulk of their respected works written by other people?
Machine said:I could generate a long list of musical acts that I don't "get" but you don't see me starting threads saying "I don't understand the love for Tool/Deftones/Skrillex/etc. at all"
Time and place. I don't think they're that good either, but it's time and place. I can at least understand why they're an important band even if looking at them from the lens of a 20-something year old guy, I don't think their music is anything special.SpartanForce said:What a overrated band. Come on. Just look at this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhzF2K2b7Xo&feature=fvwrel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e50uIZCjQqI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBVpcclx3vA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW4p02Nm1Vs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqcqZlFMUYQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rg5U1-nQHsE
etc, all from the 60s. all hundred times better that any beatles song
da fuck this beatlemania had so special? (and has until today)
mediocre vocal, bad instrumental with 3 notes (so you can say that they have feeling anyway... well, no, just laziness).
well beatle fans, just give me a why. that's all I ask.
You need to listen to more of their music.LuchaShaq said:As someone born way after their prime I don't get it either. Some catchy fluffy pop songs. Yay?
Gustav said:Man, I really need to make that list. There are so many, it's ridiculous:
Kiss
Tool
Slayer
Iron Maiden
ABBA
The Ramones
Rolling Stones
Pink Floyd
Elvis
Manowar
Depeche Mode
I'm glad I got that off my chest.
I could make an at least semi-compelling argument against all those bands. That isn't to say I don't like some of those bands, but it's not like it's a non-debatable point.Diprosalic said:i guess you don't like music?
Diprosalic said:i guess you don't like music?
I love Paul's bass lines on "And Your Bird Can Sing." As far as I'm concerned, Paul provided the lexicon for bass in pop/rock music. </hyperbole>Dahellisdat said:I've always loved the Beatles, but I think playing the Beatles Rock Band game actually made me love them even more. There are so many little nuances of each part they did that I never really appreciated until Rock Band made me notice exactly what they were doing with each instrument during a song. Paul McCartney is an incredible bassist.
If they are "generic" sounding to you it's probably just because all pop music made in the past 40 years has been massively influenced by them.ChackanKun said:Oh god I thought I was alone in this!
Altough "Hey Jude" is a great song, most of TB songs are quite generic and not that catchy.
Angry Grimace said:I could make an at least semi-compelling argument against all those bands. That isn't to say I don't like some of those bands, but it's not like it's a non-debatable point.
You clearly have no clue.LuchaShaq said:As someone born way after their prime I don't get it either. Some catchy fluffy pop songs. Yay?
Xun said:You clearly have no clue.
'65 onwards and they were a completely different band.
So does this sound like a fluffy pop song to you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZp_-7YUn-s
scotcheggz said:Not really, there was a thriving psych scene without the beatles and it is almost 100% better than anything the beatles produced, but sure, they were influential to the popular industry.
wonderkins said:I love Paul's bass lines on "And Your Bird Can Sing." As far as I'm concerned, Paul provided the lexicon for bass in pop/rock music. </hyperbole>
Mama Robotnik said:You want people to justify their subjective musical tastes over your subjective musical tastes?
Most people who criticise their work only know of the earlier/more poppy songs.Diprosalic said:i guess some people in this thread only know hey jude and yesterday.
Well, you could say it's boring, meandering drug music that takes forever to get to the point and goes off on boring tangents like 60% of the time. Too atmospheric. I can say I legitimately don't like Piper at the Gates, but I don't think the Syd Barrett era is all that well-regarded anyways.Diprosalic said:well anyone with an ear could make compelling arguments against slayer but i dare you to try it with Pink Floyd
you monster.
Most definitely. I actually have a James Jamerson book that my bass teacher would work out of with me that came with a cd. Paul McCartney does a little bit on one of the tracks expplaining how much of an influence Jamerson's bass playing had on himself. Dat motown bass is definitely some of the sickest bass I've ever heard in my life.Vice said:I would say James Jamerson was a massively more influential bass player from that time period to pop music.
Hmm, I'm not gonna disagree. Let's see how long 'til my head explodes.Vice said:I would say James Jamerson was a massively more influential bass player from that time period to pop music.
Love?OneEightZero said:...but that's all you need.![]()
PhoncipleBone said:I honestly do not know how to respond to the thread. I am just at a loss for words. Are the Beatles my favorite band ever? No. But are they the greatest band ever? Without a doubt. The fact that many people still scrutinize and listen to their music over 40 years later is a testament to their talent and impact. It is not just people that were alive then or children of the flower power movement. Great music transcends time and cultures, and The Beatles did that.
It is also amazing to think that they put out all those albums and changed their sound so drastically over only 7 or so years. Their songwriting is some of the best ever, and their instrumentation is incredible as well. Were there better musicians then? Oh, yeah. But the whole package of singing, songwriting, and musicianship in each member of the band was just unparalleled. And their work just seems to get better and better as I get older. I am appreciating it more with each passing year.