ThaiGrocer
Member
So did Miyamoto just double-dutch us all?
PantherLotus said:I'm not sure why people are upset about people voicing negative opinions about positive impressions. The title of the thread itself defies you to say something contrarian!
The game could be fun as hell. That wasn't my point. My point is that, no matter how good or bad the game is, saying, "Your comments are useless unless you've played the game!" is incredibly self-defeating when the person saying it has never played the game. (It's neither helpful nor polite to say even when they have, but surely the reflexive scenario is demagoguery at its worst.)doomed1 said:or perhaps this thread is more a proof positive that this game *gasp* can be fun! who would have guessed!
This inflammatory, blatantly untrue "summary" could easily devolve the discussion more than anything said in this thread by somebody not named drohne. Way to contribute.Gaborn said:Sp0rsk - "I played it and I liked it"
GAF Hive Mind - "NO U DIDN'T IT IZ TEH SUCKZOR! RAWR! I WILL NEVER BUY IT OR LIKE IT OR ENJOY IT IN ANY WAY AND MY OPINION IS RIGHT BECAUSE SP0RSK IS NOT ALLOWED TO LIKE IT WHEN I HAVEN'T TRIED IT TO TELL HIM IT SUCKS YET. BUT I KNOW IT DOES BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT DOES"
Amir0x was clamoring for a difference. The difference is that sp0rsk has sat down and actually played the final build, so he is able to see how all the different features mesh as a game, unlike during preview builds where it usually focused on one mode at a time.Liabe Brave said:The game could be fun as hell. That wasn't my point. My point is that, no matter how good or bad the game is, saying, "Your comments are useless unless you've played the game!" is incredibly self-defeating when the person saying it has never played the game. (It's neither helpful nor polite to say even when they have, but surely the reflexive scenario is demagoguery at its worst.)
Nah that was kinda the initial reaction from detractors. if it wasn't for Amirox It probably wouldn't have left that stage.Liabe Brave said:This inflammatory, blatantly untrue "summary" could easily devolve the discussion more than anything said in this thread by somebody not named drohne. Way to contribute.
jrricky said:OMG, this thread is moving. I took an hour from you guys to watch Heroes and came back and see people(^^this poster) doing the same thing he did when he saw Wiifit.......
God Damn he even said it himself.:lol
Cosmonaut X said:It won't. The specialist press is - at best - hugely divided over the title, and it's clear from the presentations and dev interviews that it's less a game and more an application or toy & is likely to be judged harshly by publications used to dealing with games.
Why not? I suppose you don't find any toys useful at all? Like toy kitchens, toy motor cycles, barbie dolls and action figures?dammitmattt said:I was negative on Wii Fit because I didn't think it would work, but it actually turned out to be decently fun as a game. It has games and applications towards life goals that are actual useful.
I don't get that impression at all from Wii Music.
that can be said about a DVD player as well. Anything that contributes nothing more than entertainment in a household can technically be called a toy. This is not what he was talking about here. Look into the subject in a more actual way.kame-sennin said:How is a video game not a toy?
/rant incomingkame-sennin said:How is a video game not a toy?
Nintendo-4Life said:that can be said about a DVD player as well. Anything that contributes nothing more than entertainment in a household can technically be called a toy. This is not what he was talking about here. Look into the subject in a more actual way.
Nocebo said:/rant incoming
Maybe a proper video game is more about rules and about having constraints in what you can do and where you can go, having goals and scores to achieve. I can understand that. Some "games" are more toys than others if you go with that definition. I feel games like Oblivion are more toys than games too.
In Oblivion I can say "LAWL king's heir" and go out into the wild to follow my own path and play with the game, doing the things I want to do (still within constraints) but I think WiiMusic is like this too.
In that respect WiiMusic is beyond guitar hero 1-3 and rock band, those games are not really about music as what they accomplish has nothing to do with playing an instrument. What you're doing is learning patterns and doing what the game needs you to do. You're not producing music because music is all about your personal input. There's too much of a constraint present in the afore mentioned games to make it anything more than a score attack game.
Sorry, but you're being an ass. It sounds good beacuse the game will adjust your notes to the tempo of the song, so you can't play off-beat. The same way every note you play will be contained inside the scale that is sounding, thus it will fit no matter what. You understand this, but you like being an ass and use another meaning of "sound" to continue being an ass. Yes, the game use MIDI tracks, and yeah, MIDI tracks don't sound as well as the real thing, but it's pretty clear where Sporks is coming from when he says no matter what you play, it will sound good.Amir0x said:You see, it doesn't come out sounding good. And not only doesn't it come out sounding good, but the game gives you no indicators either way to tell you you're being terrible.
This is the main central problem with Wii Music. Whether or not it is good for preschoolers is one thing (I think it's awful to teach children that noise making is a proper trade-off to legitimate rhythm and melody, but that's a separate argument), but there is some serious lack of critical analysis going on here.
Your impressions do not suggest you are someone who objectively understands why they like or dislike the title: you just talk in "indefinables". Oh, "I can't wipe the smile off my face." Well, that's fine. I really wish to have a meaningful discussion about this, because the reason there's two sides of the fence and both are unwilling to see the other side is because of the following:
[...]
Why should we eat crow? What has changed between the initial previews and impressions and the release that would change what any honest person felt about the game? You said you hated the game before, but you're not saying what makes it good now. You just say "I can't wipe the smile off your face." Well all that means is you simply weren't being honest with your assessment of the initial concept when we saw it, since nothing has changed.
Even sp0rsk said that he was only giving impressions, not trying to convert anyone or make any larger point. I'm not trying to defend Amir0x's dislike of the game, just his stance that it's counterproductive to set strict, arbitrary limits on who is allowed to express their opinion.pakkit said:Amir0x was clamoring for a difference. The difference is that sp0rsk has sat down and actually played the final build, so he is able to see how all the different features mesh as a game, unlike during preview builds where it usually focused on one mode at a time.
fresquito said:Sorry, but you're being an ass.
You're right. I should have had it in quotes and added a note: "in the eyes of the hardcore" or something to that effect.kame-sennin said:I agree with pretty much everything you said except the bold. I personally don't care to segregate games from "proper games". Many of Will Wright's games wouldn't fit your definition of a proper game.
heh, when listening to the Smash Bros. Melee CD Nintendo Power gave away, I would always "play conduct" to Fountain of Dreams... it's awesome and in the game even with midi it's great... I would love to conduct this in real life (I haven't played an instrument in years and don't actually know about conducting anything - though my brother was a band drum major) whether with an actual band or for play with something like Wii Music...Drkirby said:I will keep the pipe dream alive by hoping for Fountain of Dreams to get in, a great song for the conducting mode and a remix of the most identifiable Kirby song, Green Greens.
Your mommy must be proud of her little trooper.MiiMarioMii said:So I smashed Twilight Princess to pieces, Galaxy got a taste of the microwave, Resident Evil 4 got deficated and puked on in the same trash can as the Wii. I then lit a match and watched it burned for a minute. After which I put it over my head and become a freakishly deformed version of King Wii who mocks those who can't wipe that damn smile off their face while waggling in the loseless-nothing-game: Wii Music.
This and the GTA4 PC - console comparison thread.Vagabundo said:Most entertaining thread in a while.
All the heavyweights are out...
Wouldn't this have been so much better?fresquito said:The main problem of Wii Music will never be that the game doesn't tll you how good it's your performance. The same way I need nobody to tell me how good are my writtings or drawings to enjoy drawing and writting. I don't need anybod to tell me if my performance is good as long as I have fun.
Nicktals said:Everyone really bagged on it after the E3 conference, really lampooning it, and rightfully so based on that showing, but then why did journalists start changing their tune?
Jirotrom said:I don't know my friend, I'd say that the game definitely sounds a fuck ton better than it did at E3.
sp0rsk said:What changed was me getting to play it, I don't know how it played at E3, all I know was that the demo was awful. I hated it, my opinion shifted, yours won't, you and I both know nothing in this game could possibly change your mind.
sp0rsk said:Amir0x, you know nothing on this planet would have changed your mind about the game, and you knew very well there was nothing hiding in the shadows waiting to be exposed to the applause of millions of card carrying "hardcore gamers." So why get so millitant about it?
DefectiveReject said:I love how Amir0x states he agrees that sp0rsks opinion is more valid on the game, yet continues to argue the point that he is right and everyone who loves the game is wrong.
People have played it and it turns out that it's a lot of fun to play. That's it, I suppose, I'm not sure why you can't just accept that.But this still does not answer what has changed?
Wrestlemania said:People have played it and it turns out that it's a lot of fun to play. That's it, I suppose, I'm not sure why you can't just accept that.
Amir0x said:My opinion IN THIS TOPIC relates to a very specific element of the discussion. WHAT has changed from E3 2008 to now that would suggest ANYONE should change their mind one way or the other? That is all I am asking for. I am not saying my opinion is more valid, I said it is LESS valid. What I am saying is that unless he can articulate what about it suddenly changed the concept from 'fuck atrocious' to 'fun!', then we're talking in vague variables than have very little place in a meaningful discussion.
I can think of times when I've played games and I was surprised to like them. Not because the gameplay was different than I believed it to be, I just didn't think it would be so fun in practice.nli10 said:I think the argument is if nothing has changed then why is it fun now but was not before now?
I'd also like to know. I, along with many, are basing this game on what we've seen in videos, presentations and that horrible E3 demo. There are many games that just don't look fun, until you've tried them. To you Sp0rsk, this seems to be the case. You hated the game before, but now you like it. What was the thing that clicked and made you forget about all that you hated, and enjoy the game for what it is? I'm really curious, as I consider myself a potential buyer.Amir0x said:What SPECIFICALLY about playing it made it better than what you read and played before? Do you have any idea? Can you WRITE it?
It seems that a judgment cannot be made unless one has played it, well at least with sp0rsk. Maybe he liked it becuase, at first, everyone thought it was simple and dumbed down to no end. But it seems that it's much deeper than people initially thought and it's a challenge.Amir0x said:Essentially, you wrote exactly what we knew about the game, showed a video containing exactly what was bad about the game, and then added "it's fun." That's the only difference. While "it's fun" certainly has a lot of weight when assessing value to a game, the thing that we are trying to elicit from you is WHY it is fun to you now.
Oh, did sp0rsk play it once before and not like it but has changed his mind now he has the final game?nli10 said:I think the argument is if nothing has changed then why is it fun now but was not before now?
nli10 said:I think the argument is if nothing has changed then why is it fun now but was not before now?
/argumentviciouskillersquirrel said:Whether or not it lives up to that potential is a whole other matter, but until ANYONE actually trys it out, THEY WILL have no idea if it will.
Vagabundo said:Introduction of pikmin in the post-productions process creates fun.