Utako said:Wait for the 4G revision, which I guarantee will hit in 2013.
Not worth the wait.
Utako said:Wait for the 4G revision, which I guarantee will hit in 2013.
Because most people using a Kindle aren't going to be web browsing or streaming video. Those things are possible and feasible on a Vita.jamesinclair said:Im confused. I thought the super ridiculous prices for play-by-hour over 3G were because.....well, you could play games over it.
But on top of the $50 price difference, we're being asked to pay by hour to access.....facebook and online rankings? And I guess the youtubes?
Seriously?
How come Kindle lets you do basic web browsing for free?
jamesinclair said:How come Kindle lets you do basic web browsing for free?
Stumpokapow said:I'm not sure. I don't find 3G uses any more battery than Wifi, maybe even less, but if the original quoted figure didn't involve any network connectivity, hard to say.
I've been switching unsubsidized phones for a while on AT&T and besides having to start paying a smart phone tax when I switched from a dumb phone to my old iPhone, nothing's really changed. I don't think there will be any issue just putting your sim card in as long as you already have a smartphone plan.Mammoth Jones said:Any word on how much the 3G model is going to cost on TOP of someone having an ATT data plan?
I have an Iphone 4 w/ a grandfathered unlimited data plan. Can I just plug my att account into my vita and it recognizes my service and boom...on 3g w/ no extra fee? Or is it like the ipad and I gotta pay an extra monthly fee for 3g connectivity for the device?
Billychu said:I've been switching unsubsidized phones for a while on AT&T and besides having to start paying a smart phone tax when I switched from a dumb phone to my old iPhone, nothing's really changed. I don't think there will be any issue just putting your sim card in as long as you already have a smartphone plan.
Raelson said:I get ~60 ms ping on my phone in my apartment. Seems more than enough.
They will probably treat the Vita the way they currently do iPads and other tablets for 3G data, where you have a separate data plan.Mammoth Jones said:Ugh. So I'd have to completely remove my iPhone's sim card, rendering my entire phone useless in order to have 3G connectivity on my Vita?
I probably wouldn't do that as it's too much of a hassle. I'd probably just stick with the wifi model if that's the case. It's everywhere anyways, work, home, moms house, friends house...etc
But if Sony had some deal w/ ATT where subscribers to data plans could use their existing data plans without penalty (or being forced to drop down to 2gb/mo plans as is required if you wish to add tethering to your plan) I'd plurge and get the 3G model.
Billychu said:I've played games on AT&T 3G before. It depends on your area and what game you're playing. I would never play Street Fighter on it, but maybe I'd play a co-op game.
rozay said:They will probably treat the Vita the way they currently do iPads and other tablets for 3G data, where you have a separate data plan.
That's incorrect. If you are experiencing that, something is wrong. Might want to do a firmware restore.Ermac said:The iPhone gets worse battery life browsing on wifi. Unsure about the Vita, but I'm guessing it would be similar.
I'm not sure about you but I play the majority of my portable systems at home. Saving fifty dollars makes the wifi only version much more suitable for ME. If you can't play the majority of the vita catalogue online (and why would you want to with that horrendous battery life) then how can you really consider the 3G version superior at the cost of 50 more bucks?Man said:3G model switches to Wifi mode whenever such a conneciton is available.
You are offline with the Wifi model if no open Wifi network in reach.
The Wifi model isn't superior in any fashion except price (and you loose a lot by saving those $50).
That's why if they do the 'pay for xx hours' method here, it'd work for me.EloquentM said:I'm not sure about you but I play the majority of my portable systems at home. Saving fifty dollars makes the wifi only version much more suitable for ME. If you can't play the majority of the vita catalogue online (and why would you want to with that horrendous battery life) then how can you really consider the 3G version superior at the cost of 50 more bucks?
Prepaid time would be sufficient.dallow_bg said:That's why if they do the 'pay for xx hours' method here, it'd work for me.
I play mostly at home too, but on the few times when I am out with the device. I could just use the pre-paid time. Which I'm sure would last me a while.
dallow_bg said:That's why if they do the 'pay for xx hours' method here, it'd work for me.
I play mostly at home too, but on the few times when I am out with the device. I could just use the pre-paid time. Which I'm sure would last me a while.
OldJadedGamer said:When my internet went out, I had to depend on my cell phone's 3G connection acting as a WiFi hotspot and was able to stream Netflix with it... didn't try to play any games though.
Depends on how AT&T implements it no?Fernando Rocker said:The pre-paid time has an expiration day, thought... I think 3 months?
Since many sites seem to be missing it, I'll just post the details from the NTT Docomo press release here:Fernando Rocker said:The pre-paid time has an expiration day, thought... I think 3 months?
Are you sure about that?knitoe said:That's incorrect. If you are experiencing that, something is wrong. Might want to do a firmware restore.
I would say no due to latency, speed, signal not always available everywhere, etc.Fernando Rocker said:Is it possible to play online games with the 3G functionality?
Near, Facebook, web browsing, PSN store, party chat, game gifts asynchronous multiplayer, etc is ok for 3G.Fernando Rocker said:If I recall correctly, the only games we are going to be able to play online are asynchronous modes, like for example, Hot Shots Golf.
3G download speeds are good, but the latency is very high.
So... the 3G will be used mostly for the social features and Near, right?
Infinite Justice said:How was the streaming.
OldJadedGamer said:I was doing a LOST marathon at the time and the quality was great. Not HD of course but better than network TV. Oddly when I streamed Netlfix from my iPad using the 3G it looked like crap but on the 360 it was great.
The iPhone Netflix app looks surprisingly amazing over 3G also.Infinite Justice said:How was the streaming.
jamesinclair said:Im confused. I thought the super ridiculous prices for play-by-hour over 3G were because.....well, you could play games over it.
But on top of the $50 price difference, we're being asked to pay by hour to access.....facebook and online rankings? And I guess the youtubes?
Seriously?
How come Kindle lets you do basic web browsing for free?
hahah such a random place to mention acrophobia but i'm glad i caught it.Stumpokapow said:party games (acrophobia, for example!)
The whole point of 3G is internet in parts that are not your home...TAJ said:I rarely get over 80ms at home on my 3G. (Verizon, North San Diego County)
I've been gaming on it for 5 years. I didn't know it was supposed to be terrible for that.