I actually don't think this one is silly at all. I'm not talking about Jesus himself, I'm talking about the early church. People weren't stupid back then, they knew quite well people didn't raise from the dead. What happened to cause those early followers to be willing to die, to be fed to lions, to oppose Caesar, to take in the unwanted babies in the streets, etc.? We're not just talking immediate followers either, we're talking about a ripple effect of people in different locations, over the period of decades.
It's a worthwhile question to ponder, even if you don't believe in God. It's fascinating to me because most people would have just asked their friends that were around if this actually happened. I doubt many people would have jumped on board with a dangerous, minority, religion that was getting you slaughtered. Something historically/sociologically fascinating happened there, whatever it was.
It carries some weight I think in the sense that, again, a religion about a God who wins through being executed in a horrible way gains unimaginable traction in a very short time in the face of direct opposition. Marcus Borg and Dominic Crossan do some great work to show how historically interesting this truly was.
Not correct, but interesting. You have a religion that makes all the faux pas and is still validated. You don't find that interesting and somewhat compelling if you are trying to land on a specific religion?
Walter Bruggeman
Brian Zahnd
Shane Claiborne
Michael Gungor
Rob Bell
N.T. Wright
Greg Boyd
Dominic Crossan
Marcus Borg
Richard Beck
Peter Rollins
Scott Mcknight
Dallas Willard
Walter Wink
(I tried to get a mix of perspectives and backgrounds in there) I can keep going for a long, long time
I definitely find it fascinating and well deserved. Though there is a lot of debate on if the "NA" group is growing or just becoming more acceptable and thus more accurate. But I welcome religious skeptics to the podium (in many ways I am one).