Sony and Microsoft do innovate, they contribute new ideas. But they do so at a slower pace and without the sharp daring of Nintendo. They are the trundling tank corps in gaming’s victories over other forms of entertainment, but Nintendo is the screaming dive-bomber.
IGN Puff Piece said:Because no-one does it better. No-one has ever done it better...stronger, harder and faster...
So, Sony and Microsoft, being the slow tankers they are, manage to beat Nintendo during the HD race, even though they were running at a slower pace.
My questions lies in the fact that if Microsoft and Sony were slow tankers during that race, where was Nintendo? Was Nintendo dragging its ass on the ground like a paraplegic using only its arms to get anywhere?
Hopefully the Wii-U can be Nintendo's wheelchair so that it 'innovate' better than its competition at faster pace.
The article is kissing ass so much no matter how you look at it; the author is walking on eggshells and compromises to make both the pessimists and optimists feel at home.
It's truly sad Nintendo will no longer make those Christmas evenings where you crack open the box and uncover a Zelda title, only to have your eldest brother and other siblings make snarky remarks about how it isn't a true RPG, then telling you he wants to try it. lol Love the old days, man it was so fun even though Link was on the receiving end of those jokes.
IGN:
![]()
I don't know about you guys, but I think I need a cold shower!
I'm expecting 60-70 million Wii Us, so it'll be closer to the Wii than the Gamecube me thinks.
Whoa! You are a true console warrior.
I'm really not sure why people are getting emotional over this article.
GAF + IGN + NintendoWhoa! You are a true console warrior.
I'm really not sure why people are getting emotional over this article.
This must've been hard to type with a straight face.IGN said:But Nintendo is really not about the past,
This must've been hard to type with a straight face.
In a way I think the Wii U's biggest threat is how the media will declare it a failure if sales don't match the Wii's pacing. Would selling 50 million Wii U be a failure? No, but you know websites or Pacther will say it failed compared to Wii.
I also think every console manufacturer should expect decreases over current generation sales. Sony, MS, and Nintendo will not each have machines sell in the 70 million range.
So, Sony and Microsoft, being the slow tankers they are, manage to beat Nintendo during the HD race, even though they were running at a slower pace.
My questions lies in the fact that if Microsoft and Sony were slow tankers during that race, where was Nintendo? Was Nintendo dragging its ass on the ground like a paraplegic using only its arms to get anywhere?
Hopefully the Wii-U can be Nintendo's wheelchair so that it 'innovate' better than its competition at faster pace.
The article is kissing ass so much no matter how you look at it; the author is walking on eggshells and compromises to make both the pessimists and optimists feel at home.
It's truly sad Nintendo will no longer make those Christmas evenings where you crack open the box and uncover a Zelda title, only to have your eldest brother and other siblings make snarky remarks about how it isn't a true RPG, then telling you he wants to try it. lol Love the old days, man it was so fun even though Link was on the receiving end of those jokes.
This must've been hard to type with a straight face.
I'll be really surprised if the Wii U succeeds long-term. Sure, it will sell well at first because of Nintendo fanboys and clueless parents, but once the next-gen systems get announced (probably six months from now) I expect the numbers to drop off fairly quickly. Nintendo clearly has massive margins on the hardware so it will be a financial success no matter what, but I think the the Wii U will be a 12-month flash-in-the-pan even if they drop the price to $199 in the spring.
Somebody should do a dramatic reading of this.
:lolThis must've been hard to type with a straight face.
I'm expecting 35-40million, closer to Gamecube and one step closer for Nintendo to irrelevance.
Lots of the casual crowd already moved on to facebook and mobiles.
The rest will probably see no reason to upgrade from their Wii
Now we have arrived at a time when the games console as a concept is being threatened by new technologies and new behaviors. Does this mean that Nintendo is about to become obsolete? It means exactly the opposite. Whatever the future looks like, it needs Nintendo to be there, innovating, gambling, making mistakes, understanding the fundamentals of human play, being a leader.
It isnt enough for Nintendo to become merely another provider of software, feeding games-IP and cute characters into the roaring mill of some console-less future. It is impossible to disconnect Nintendo games with Nintendo consoles, impossible to imagine the NES separate from Super Mario Bros or the Wii divorced from Wii Sports. In the future, Nintendo needs to be doing more than merely making games.
I've read this line at least a dozen times, and I'm absolutely convinced that it is utterly meaningless.IGN said:[...] Nintendos characteristic understanding of human behavior - we all touch small screens, even when confronted by a large screen [...]
IGN:
![]()
I've read this line at least a dozen times, and I'm absolutely convinced that it is utterly meaningless.
I'll be really surprised if the Wii U succeeds long-term. Sure, it will sell well at first because of Nintendo fanboys and clueless parents, but once the next-gen systems get announced (probably six months from now) I expect the numbers to drop off fairly quickly. Nintendo clearly has massive margins on the hardware so it will be a financial success no matter what, but I think the the Wii U will be a 12-month flash-in-the-pan even if they drop the price to $199 in the spring.
I'm expecting 35-40million, closer to Gamecube and one step closer for Nintendo to irrelevance.
Your wish is my command.Someone needs to update the IGeNerator
"Why Zynga must succeed"
"Why booth babes must succeed"
"Why on-disc DLC must succeed"
Do it!
I'll be really surprised if the Wii U succeeds long-term. Sure, it will sell well at first because of Nintendo fanboys and clueless parents, but once the next-gen systems get announced (probably six months from now) I expect the numbers to drop off fairly quickly. Nintendo clearly has massive margins on the hardware so it will be a financial success no matter what, but I think the the Wii U will be a 12-month flash-in-the-pan even if they drop the price to $199 in the spring.
Well, the DS did outsell the Wii. And iPhones outsell everything!what you are not even going to cover what they will say if Wii U sells just as well?
Touch >>> Waggle
Your wish is my command.
I'll be really surprised if the Wii U succeeds long-term. Sure, it will sell well at first because of Nintendo fanboys and clueless parents, but once the next-gen systems get announced (probably six months from now) I expect the numbers to drop off fairly quickly. Nintendo clearly has massive margins on the hardware so it will be a financial success no matter what, but I think the the Wii U will be a 12-month flash-in-the-pan even if they drop the price to $199 in the spring.
I wouldn't mind seeing WiiU fail.
I'd love to play great Nintendo IP on Sony & MS consoles. I think having 3 consoles out there is a bit much, the industry is too fractured. And I just don't see Nintendo advancing the hardware much. Waggle was fun for a while but it did grow stale.
Then again, a lot of people probably want a lower-cost console option. New MS & Sony consoles will probably be released with higher prices than the WiiU (but not $599 high).
*Puts asbestos suit on*
I wouldn't mind seeing WiiU fail.
I'd love to play great Nintendo IP on Sony & MS consoles. I think having 3 consoles out there is a bit much, the industry is too fractured. And I just don't see Nintendo advancing the hardware much. Waggle was fun for a while but it did grow stale.
Then again, a lot of people probably want a lower-cost console option. New MS & Sony consoles will probably be released with higher prices than the WiiU (but not $599 high).
*Puts asbestos suit on*