Some good points, and i would say yeah it probably is the best movie tie in that i can remember?
My major issue with the game back then was that you had much more control in a PC shooter than you had in Goldeneye, the kind of aiming and movement you could do in Quake (granted Quake is a much faster game) was very different to how limited you were in Goldeneye.
Goldeneye did have a better single player than say a game like Quake or Doom, which were just Key collecting mazes with very little of any kind of narrative. But they had fast paced, twitch like gameplay, they also had online and LAN capability.
While obviously subjective, i had little fun playing Goldeneye multiplayer, because it seemed so second rate compared to playing Quake online or LAN, the action was faster, i felt more in control etc.
Other than the visuals, how different is Quake or Quake 2 really from current FPS games in 2013? I think they hold up incredibly well. While Goldeneye in my opinion does not hold up at all, and a large reason for that is the N64 controller, rather than the game itself.
Half Life 1 still holds up, as does Halo, Modern Warfare and most games on that list still are fun to play, the genre just looks better today and is more linear when it comes to single player, while Goldeneye seems so far detached from most shooters today, predominately because of that controller.
