So I plumped for the Note. Yeah, it is almost comically large, but then so is the screen and battery. I don't make that many phone calls anyway, it's mainly texting and web browsing.
Thanks for the help guys.
Just get the Lumia 800 or the Omnia 7. No need to downgrade to Android.
You should have waited a week MWC is next week and there will be a lot of new phones being announced. Also dat screen is way too big.
Or wait for the Lumia 900
If your so convinced on downgrading to Android here are my recomendations:
Galaxy Nexus (the new one)
Galaxy Note
Galaxy S2
No other phones bar the Galaxy Series, end of the discusion.
Slow? You sure? My first generation WP7.5 telephone is blazing fast...I don't see the appeal of WP7, it's ugly, restrictive, and quite slow in my experience. It's nice enough to use, it just doesn't seem to offer a great deal. And apps and games are extortionate on it. Yay for MS.
Slow? You sure? My first generation WP7.5 telephone is blazing fast...
You can say anything about WP7, but slow isn't the right word...
Touchwiz noticeably improved performance over stock Gingerbread and added a bunch of extra features and codecs.You should also know that these stupid, ugly skins that manufacturers put on android tend to do two things: slow the OS down compared to stock android, and more importantly, delay or prevent software upgrades to the OS.
Maybe it's the handset (HTC Mozart) but it stalls in the browser all the time. I dunno, it kind of feels like there isn't much to WP7, it feels really underwhelming. Android seems to be a veritable treasure trove of content, WP7 has a handful of overpriced games, and some apps I'll never use. The cupboards just seem a little bare to me.
What is the relevance if support in 3+ years? Nobody keeps a phone that long.Galaxy S 2 will, eventually, stop being officially supported by Samsung, just like the Galaxy S was.
I have an original Galaxy S that doesn't even have an official port of Cyanogen 9 to it. The Galaxy S 2 has one, but the Galaxy S one is a port of the alpha version of Cyanogen 9 made by users, and there's a couple of bugs in it.
Galaxy Nexus will always be officially supported by Google (in the next 2-3 years). And when it stops being supported by Google itself (just like the Nexus One won't receive an official port of ICS), it will be forever supported by Cyanogen, as it's a 100% open platform with open drivers.
Unless you absolutely need the external SD card, I see no reason to go with the Galaxy S 2. Barring some stupid omissions (The original Galaxy S and the Nexus S are essentially the same phone, but the Nexus S doesn't have Gorilla Glass) and when comparing same-generation phones, the "Google Experience" phone is always the better choice.
How long is the contract? If it is 2 years, you are paying £240 ($380) more.
What is the relevance if support in 3+ years? Nobody keeps a phone that long.
Android as an OS is considerably more advanced under the hood. WP7 is a pretty face but that's all really by comparison. Anyone who thinks Android is a 'downgrade' is quite frankly delusional. Also, WebKit blows all incarnations of Internet Explorer away, the browsers on iOS and Android run rings around whatever MS is using in WP7 these days. Plus Chrome is now in beta on Android, and Firefox has been on Android forever (though kind of crappy). I think MS are calling whatever WP7 has Mobile IE9 but it's still mostly based on the Trident engine used in IE8, a browser which is almost 3 years old.
The Note is a fantastic device and it will do things that WP7 devices haven't even dreamed of yet. Oh, you'll be getting ICS on March 1st supposedly, so that's something to look forward to!
Yeah. These fucking contracts now are bullshit. To get a new phone free now on contract, it just isn't worth it. In fact even if you pay some money up front, it still probably isn't worth it.
You're better of getting a sim-free phone and going sim only.
I'd also wait until March/April because some of the new quad-core phones will be out then. If you're getting your phone on one of those bullshit contracts, it will probably piss you off when you realise you could have got a much better phone if you waited a couple of months. Even if you don't want the latest phone, the inevitable price drop you'll see once the next-gen phones start rolling out is enough to wait.
Yeah. These fucking contracts now are bullshit. To get a new phone free now on contract, it just isn't worth it. In fact even if you pay some money up front, it still probably isn't worth it.
You're better off getting a sim-free phone and going sim only.
I'd also wait until March/April because some of the new quad-core phones will be out then. If you're getting your phone on one of those bullshit contracts, it will probably piss you off when you realise you could have got a much better phone if you waited a couple of months. Even if you don't want the latest phone, the inevitable price drop you'll see once the next-gen phones start rolling out is enough to wait.
Galaxy S 2 will, eventually, stop being officially supported by Samsung, just like the Galaxy S was.
Galaxy Nexus will always be officially supported by Google (in the next 2-3 years).
To be honest though are they really that bad, a 2 year contract at £30 a month works out at £720 which includes getting a four to five hundred pound phone "free" meaning your only paying two to three hundred pounds for the phone service, not too bad when looked at that way, its just not as good as we used to get it but at least its still a damn site better than the Americans get
I hear what you are saying, but to get a brand new phone, I'd probably have to pay, which I'm not willing to do. Plus, no matter when you get you're phone, it'll be superseded by a better handset a few months down the line. If I waited till April and posted a similar thread, I'd no doubt get someone saying, "you should wait till August, the new phones will be coming out". It's like buying a PC, no matter what you do, it'll be out of date before you know it.
To be honest though are they really that bad, a 2 year contract at £30 a month works out at £720 which includes getting a four to five hundred pound phone "free" meaning your only paying two to three hundred pounds for the phone service, not too bad when looked at that way, its just not as good as we used to get it but at least its still a damn site better than the Americans get
Yeah. Mobile World Congress begins on the 27th of this month. At least wait to see what is coming out.
Depends what phone you're getting.
The Galaxy Nexus on Three comes to a total of £816 on the cheapest tariff. That is if you want the phone free. £34 a month to be exact. You get 500 minutes, 1000 texts and 1000mb of data for that.
Price on Amazon: £440. You can get it a little cheaper than that though. If you get a £12 month sim only contract with a similar amount of mintues and data it will cost you a total of £144. That comes to £584
I've also noticed that three has stopped doing the all-you-can-eat data for £15 offer. :/
http://store.three.co.uk/SIM_Only/Voice_Pay_Monthly
I've already ordered the Note, it's arriving on Friday. I'm sure there'll be better phones announced, but probably not for free on a £30 a month contract. That's my limit too, so with all the extras I got, I'd be pushed to find a better deal elsewhere.
To be honest though are they really that bad, a 2 year contract at £30 a month works out at £720 which includes getting a four to five hundred pound phone "free" meaning your only paying two to three hundred pounds for the phone service, not too bad when looked at that way, its just not as good as we used to get it but at least its still a damn site better than the Americans get
Okay. The Note is a bit too big for me. Not the phone I would choose, but a decent one none the less.
It wasn't the only reason I said wait though. There could very well be a drop on contract prices in a couple of months on certain phones once the newer phones start coming out. You'll be stuck on that contract for 2 years.
But that's always the case though. There is always something better that comes along, no matter when you upgrade. I agree with everything else you said, but "hang on till the new phones come out" is something you could say to anyone, regardless of the situation. As I said, it's like PC's, there almost isn't such a thing as top-spec in such a fast moving industry.
And no matter when you start, you are always stuck with a 2 year contract. These issues are not exclusive to my situation, they are just cold hard facts.
The S2 will get ICS anyway.
A note?? Ok well good luck I guess, want some links for how to restitch your pockets 2 inches wider?
Just curious how MS is 'restrictive'. What about the OS not letting you do that you want to do? I've had android and WP7 and I completely agree that Android is much more user friendly for people who want to do what they want to do with their phones but how is WP7 restrictive to you? You said you were a very simple user so I was curious how a simple user would feel the way you did.
Also, you're in for a bit of a shock if you think you'll get improved battery life from a top end android phone. As much as I loved the OS, the battery life on almost every phone was terrible. I rarely made it through half a day on my EVO while my work S2 isn't much better. My titan (wp7) and even more so my wife's Focus S (wp7) absolutely destroy anything I've ever used when it comes to battery life.
Not trying to convince you not to get an android phone. I think you should. I like switching OS's every time I get a new phone. Keeps everything fresh.
You should probably stay away from Android then if you want games. iPhone is where it's at if you want high performance mobile games. It has the largest number of quality apps and the best games are much higher quality than anything on Android.Well, it's the phone I currently own, so it's hardly superfluous information is it?
And the reason I dislike WP7, is it just seems so restrictive, has weak support for games and apps, and I just generally dislike the tile interface.
You should probably stay away from Android then if you want games. iPhone is where it's at if you want high performance mobile games. It has the largest number of quality apps and the best games are much higher quality than anything on Android.
Android is less restrictive but I have to ask; to what end? What is it that you want to do that you think Android will offer?
I've spent time with all three operating systems and I absolutely hated using Android overall.
It's that much more expensive, huh? In the US, an iPhone 4S basically costs the same on contract as any number of other smart phones. A Galaxy S2 is the same price as a 4S around here.Yeah, but iPhone's are insultingly expensive (£100 up front, then £50 a month for the basic package? Yeah, no thanks) I refuse to pay almost three times the amount over the two years just to get a better choice of games. And the Note is a more capable device, gaming aside.
It doesn't matter what kind of hardware you have if the games aren't even available on your platformAnd the Note is a more capable device, gaming aside.
It doesn't matter what kind of hardware you have if the games aren't even available on your platform
No matter, you'll find out this stuff for yourself now that you've bought into Android
So I'm going to upgrade my HTC Mozart to an Android phone, as I dislike the OS, and the battery is atrocious. I can get a Galaxy S2 for £30/month or a Galaxy Nexus for £40/month. As far as I am aware, apart from the S2 being on Gingerbread, and the Nexus running ICS, there is little to tell these devices apart. The Nexus also has a better screen, but is that alone worth an extra £10 a month? Or is ICS leaps and bounds better than Gingerbread?
Also, how are Samsungs batteries? I don't expect it to last more than a day, but my HTC is usually flat by mid-afternoon. Will I regret not plumping for the Nexus? Has anyone used both?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
It doesn't matter what kind of hardware you have if the games aren't even available on your platform
No matter, you'll find out this stuff for yourself now that you've bought into Android
Eh? I said "gaming aside" it's a more capable device. Regardless, gaming isn't the be all and end all to me. I few little time-wasters and GTA3 will do me! But obviously iOS is the place for mobile gaming, but they are asking me for way too much money. I could get this phone, a Vita, some games, and still have the best part of a grand to spare! The iPhone, as good as it is, is ridculously priced to me.
My nexus one says you're a liar. Launched in 2009, forgotten by late 2010. Has the hardware necessary for ice cream sandwich but ain't getting it.
iOS still does have much more games, though there's a great deal to keep you busy, and it's definitely improved a lot in the last couple years. Here's a couple of threads to keep you busy:
Android Gaming Thread
Apps for Android Thread
Enjoy your new phone! The Note does look really nice.. I'm looking forward to upgrading to whatever is best in another few months.
Just curious how MS is 'restrictive'. What about the OS not letting you do that you want to do? I've had android and WP7 and I completely agree that Android is much more user friendly for people who want to do what they want to do with their phones but how is WP7 restrictive to you? You said you were a very simple user so I was curious how a simple user would feel the way you did.
Also, you're in for a bit of a shock if you think you'll get improved battery life from a top end android phone. As much as I loved the OS, the battery life on almost every phone was terrible. I rarely made it through half a day on my EVO while my work S2 isn't much better. My titan (wp7) and even more so my wife's Focus S (wp7) absolutely destroy anything I've ever used when it comes to battery life.
Not trying to convince you not to get an android phone. I think you should. I like switching OS's every time I get a new phone. Keeps everything fresh.
It's that much more expensive, huh? In the US, an iPhone 4S basically costs the same on contract as any number of other smart phones. A Galaxy S2 is the same price as a 4S around here.
The iPhone itself is quite fast. Android phones are all about specs, but the OS is slow enough that you still run into performance issues and hitches. The iPhone experience is just much smoother overall and more tailored to a mobile experience. Also, the Note uses a Pentile matrix screen (which I detest).
Still, it's a non-issue as the price difference in Europe kind of kills the iPhone idea for ya.
I'm pretty sure it's Apple's deal to be honest. Network operators are told what they must charge by Apple, and are legally obligated (or at least obligated to the extent of being able to stock their product) to stick to it. That's what the guy at Orange said anyway.For some reason Iphones (at least the top ones) are charged an upfront fee for even with a contract which totally goes against how the uk has always had phones free on contract for the last 10 years, its probably mainly due to the networks thinking they can get away charging "cos you know like its an Iphone"
Android as an OS is considerably more advanced under the hood. WP7 is a pretty face but that's all really by comparison. Anyone who thinks Android is a 'downgrade' is quite frankly delusional. Also, WebKit blows all incarnations of Internet Explorer away, the browsers on iOS and Android run rings around whatever MS is using in WP7 these days. Plus Chrome is now in beta on Android, and Firefox has been on Android forever (though kind of crappy). I think MS are calling whatever WP7 has Mobile IE9 but it's still mostly based on the Trident engine used in IE8, a browser which is almost 3 years old.
The Note is a fantastic device and it will do things that WP7 devices haven't even dreamed of yet. Oh, you'll be getting ICS on March 1st supposedly, so that's something to look forward to!
I hate the Windows Phone UI (so ugly), so I'm basically waiting out the iPhone 5 or Galaxy S3 announcements. Hurry up! I'm just going to keep my Blackberry contract rolling monthly until one of them come out.