This 'study' is the stupidest fucking shit.
Bullshit
Based on Foursquare check-ins.
California knows what's up with Canes though, well done.
Bueno over Oklahoma invalidates the list.
Bueno is fuckin' awful slop
Bell > Bueno any day of the week. Bueno is trash.
No it doesn't Bueno is the only religion we're allowed to practice outside of Christianity in Oklahoma.
Bueno is fuckin' awful slop
Bell > Bueno any day of the week. Bueno is trash.
As a Hawaii person, that map seems odd to me. Popeye's? We have them only on one island in the whole State and it's not like people ever talk about it.
Definitely wrong on this. Bueno actually has salsa and mexican food that makes sense (no doritos or fried chicken shell tacos)
They both have their place but Bueno is better.
Bullshit study
It simply looked at the average number of visits per location and used that to determine the most popular restaurants. That makes no sense whatsoever. The "study" is a joke and in no way scientific.
That means a hugely popular chain like Whataburger (as evidenced by the fact that it has 19x more locations in TX than In-N-Out) gets penalized for having locations in less populated areas. So supply and demand dictated that Whataburger has 669 restaurants in TX and In-N-Out has 35 but the latter is deemed more "popular".
Go try a Honey Butter Chicken Strip Biscuit and tell me Whataburger isnt the best fast food on the planet!
I'm in California. Wtf is canes?
As a Hawaii person, that map seems odd to me. Popeye's? We have them only on one island in the whole State and it's not like people ever talk about it.
Bueno is terrible. I'd rather pour my dog's Alpo into a hard shell and eat that instead of Bueno.Definitely wrong on this. Bueno actually has salsa and mexican food that makes sense (no doritos or fried chicken shell tacos)
They both have their place but Bueno is better.
Business Insider's way of using stats has made them a milkshake duck's defense force that's dying on a hill.
And i am pretty sure 'visits' is Foursquare Check-Ins.
That hip service these days!
This is game news to the extreme.
In N Out is good for its prices, but Whataburger is better pound for pound.
since when are there chick fil-a in NY?
Bullshit study
It simply looked at the average number of visits per location and used that to determine the most popular restaurants. That makes no sense whatsoever. The "study" is a joke and in no way scientific.
That means a hugely popular chain like Whataburger (as evidenced by the fact that it has 19x more locations in TX than In-N-Out) gets penalized for having locations in less populated areas. So supply and demand dictated that Whataburger has 669 restaurants in TX and In-N-Out has 35 but the latter is deemed more "popular".
Has anyone had the coffee milkshake at Whataburger? Is it good?
I like their milkshakes but theyre like 100,000 calories for a small.
Bueno is fuckin' awful slop
Bell > Bueno any day of the week. Bueno is trash.