PowderedToast
Junior Member
quantum>>>>>>casino>>>>>>>>>>skyfall
quantum is the only one i can see myself ever watching again in the future
quantum is the only one i can see myself ever watching again in the future
Casino Royale > Skyfall > Quantum of Solace
The only right answer.
1.) Skyfall - > CR.
3,000,000) Quantum of Solace
In my own personal order of enjoyment...
1) Skyfall
2) Casino Royale
3) Quantum of Solace
Casino Royale > Skyfall > Quantum of Solace
The only right answer.
This.1) Casino Royale
.
.
2) Skyfall
3) Quantum of Solace
CR >>>> SF > QoS
Somehow CR flows much better. It's a shame itsvillain"man behind the man".will never be resolved
Thread should really be: which is better, Skyfall or Casino Royale?
Thread should really be: which is better, Skyfall or Casino Royale?
Casino Royale has a more interesting structure and it's a great character piece, but I think Skyfall is a thematically stronger film. Both have incredible action, although Skyfall gains a slight edge from Deakins. At the end of the day, they're both of similar quality..and they play well alongside one another. Right now, I'd probably place Skyfall a smidgeon above, but that might just be because it's brand new.
Skyfall=Casino Royale > Quantum of Solace
Casino Royale
Skyfall
3 pounds of shit
quantum
how anyone can put quantum above skyfall is a mystery to me...how they can put it above any film ever is a mystery. It was just bad. I had no clue what was happening
Skyfall was the only one that had a "Bond" feel. The others could have all been generic action movies.
But that isn't even a discussion. Skyfall is mediocre. Casino Royale is Top 5 Bond.
Casino Royale falls apart after Montenegro. It's still a great movie, but that last third is one of the more boring stretches in the series.
The problem with Skyfall's "Bond" feel is that it didn't match up well AT ALL with how they were trying to combine it with the modern day Craig Bond. All of the attempts in Skyfall to make it like older Bonds was cringeworthy.
I thought the blend was really well done, myself, but that's because I'm pretty familiar with the older bonds they were choosing to homage (Goldfinger, On Her Majestys, From Russia). I'm wondering if the people decrying any link between Craig's Bond in Casino Royale and any previous Bonds are using some sort of polyglot memory of "James Bond" as opposed to having a real idea of what the good Bond movies that came previous were actually like.
Skyfall was no where near as good and intelligent as Casino Royale. I liked Skyfall, but it was just a revenge plot.
In my own personal order of enjoyment...
1) Skyfall
2) Casino Royale
3) Quantum of Solace
there was car chasing one other car.
A few boats crashed or flips
Some house or building blew up.
Skyfall is the only Bond film ever made to have theme and depth.
You obviously have not seen On Her Majesty's Secret Service, For Your Eyes Only, Living Daylights or Licence to Kill.
Skyfall is the only Bond film ever made to have theme and depth.
I can''t believe people are putting Skyfall above Casion Royale. The movie was kind of fun but a complete cluster fuck.
You obviously have not seen On Her Majesty's Secret Service, For Your Eyes Only, Living Daylights or Licence to Kill.
I can''t believe people are putting Skyfall above Casion Royale. The movie was kind of fun but a complete cluster fuck.
Casino Royale >> Skyfall >>>>>>>>>>> Quantum of Solace.
I have seen them. I disagree that they have anywhere within the same ballpark of depth as Skyfall does. This isn't necessarily always to Skyfall's credit, mind (they do occasionally get a bit wanky with the whole obsolete theme, and motherhood and whatever), but its a level of richness that most Bond films, Casino Royale included, haven't even thought of.
There's a character named James Bond but these certainly aren't Bond films.