These 2 hurt. Still day one though.
Narrative is a pretty obvious one, given his hyperboles. Bioshock Infinite, GTAV? Dickens.
I really like Sessler he is one of my favorite reviewers but giving Titanfall 5/5 and 3/5 for infamous is hard to swallow...
Why is that so hard for you to understand?I really like Sessler he is one of my favorite reviewers but giving Titanfall 5/5 and 3/5 for infamous is hard to swallow...
I think it's pretty clear; The game visually looks amazing but the gameplay is bung average, exactly what I feared from an open world game.
It scares me how much this game smells of Gravity Rush.
Sucker Punch and Sony asked us to not spoil the latter parts of the game. I don't even name the third and fourth powersets in my review, even though most of you know them already.
Jim Sterling for the Escapist 3 and a half stars.
What made you lower your prediction while playing it?
What's confusing about that? They liked GZ better.
lol at people bitching out Sessler. The man who's played and beat the game obviously has a lesser formed opinion than us. Maybe he just didn't have as much fun with it as Titanfall? Not that the two reviews should be compared in any way in the first place.
82 with 10 scores.78 now
Hoping more will pull it up.
GTA receiving hate now. Damnit GAF
why do they keep calling the fire ability the smoke ability.
Are there actually any smoke attacks?
Did you forget to play Crysis or something? That was a much greater leap than Half-Life 2 ever was (which was just a scripted game with neat physics).Please, the last game that had "next gen" gameplay was HL2.
What's confusing about that? They liked GZ better.
Jim Sterling for the Escapist 3 and a half stars.
Seems like it's going to be a decent but not very memorable game. PS4 still waiting for that killer app.
It's times like this where I wish Sony had been a bit faster with that digital refund policy. This game screams "sale pickup".
Why are we even giving these reviewers the time of day?
They are corrupt, incompetent, juvenile fanboys fuelled by junk food and dependant on the very teet they "review".
One bad review can blacklist them from events, early review copies, merchandise etc which will end their career.
We know it happens. We know they get bribed. We know they have agendas. We know they suck fucking ass. So why are we still treating them like they matter?
I think it's pretty clear; The game visually looks amazing but the gameplay is bung average, exactly what I feared from an open world game.
It scares me how much this game smells of Gravity Rush.
lol at people bitching out Sessler. The man who's played and beat the game obviously has a lesser formed opinion than us. Maybe he just didn't have as much fun with it as Titanfall? Not that the two reviews should be compared in any way in the first place.
So nothing this gen is next-gen then.
Please dont ban me for asking this but why is Sesslers Review even listed here? How does this guy stil have ANY credibility left after his Twitter meltdown and still being pissed for not getting a free PS4 before launch?
Im just getting frustrated with that guy. I seriously dont understand how he gave Titanfall a 5 (which is graphically underperforming, framerate is dropping etc.) and Infamous only a 3 which is graphically an amazing looking game, has fantastic acting / face performances and a great story.
Also... Why the hell is infamous being compared to GTA?! I honestly don't see anything in common between these two games. Open world? So what, it cold mean a bunch of different things these days.![]()
Not one review says the gameplays average, most praise the power saying it is outstanding fun........
Im just getting frustrated with that guy. I seriously dont understand how he gave Titanfall a 5 (which is graphically underperforming, framerate is dropping etc.) and Infamous only a 3 which is graphically an amazing looking game, has fantastic acting / face performances and a great story.
Sad day for me, Edge and Eurogamer are the two reviewers I pay attention to.
Still getting it nonetheless.
Getting really annoyed at reviewers saying it plays like a last-gen game. Wtf does this even mean and what were we expecting in next-gen gameplay?! Every other next-gen title that is out doesn't push any gameplay boundaries at all, yet isn't reflected in the reviews :S
They don't matter. We're just following them because we have nothing to do until the game releases.
Escapist review in OP needs updating. It's 3.5/5...not out of 10.
Sessler giving Titanfall a 5/5 despite the game having basic features missing makes his inFamous review that much more of a joke.
Jim Sterling for the Escapist 3 and a half stars.
Seems like it's going to be a decent but not very memorable game. PS4 still waiting for that killer app.
It's times like this where I wish Sony had been a bit faster with that digital refund policy. This game screams "sale pickup".
"Gameplay isn't as 'next-gen' as the visuals"
What does that fucking means??!