INC
Member
is it just me that feels gaming is becoming more and more like this?
Now im not against it, when done right, remakes can out shine the original, for example, the thing, the fly, scarface, and even franchises can have a second wind, take nolan batman.
But as we all know, this also goes the other way.
Same can be said for games, resident evil was a fantastic example.
So, the discussion im looking for, in remakes and remasters, what do you think warrants a remaster/remake? What should be preserved, should anything be preserved? For another example? Would you rather a completely different take on these (to use Hollywood and risk, look at joker)
Why not give your own example of this,
how about a batman horror game, where you're the criminal and the batman is a myth/supernatural folklore, trying to stop you (obviously this isn't ideal, more of an example)
Now im not against it, when done right, remakes can out shine the original, for example, the thing, the fly, scarface, and even franchises can have a second wind, take nolan batman.
But as we all know, this also goes the other way.
Same can be said for games, resident evil was a fantastic example.
So, the discussion im looking for, in remakes and remasters, what do you think warrants a remaster/remake? What should be preserved, should anything be preserved? For another example? Would you rather a completely different take on these (to use Hollywood and risk, look at joker)
Why not give your own example of this,
how about a batman horror game, where you're the criminal and the batman is a myth/supernatural folklore, trying to stop you (obviously this isn't ideal, more of an example)