Then she really didn't like you then.Oh, she does. She's just a bit of a... how do I put it...sociopath
Then she really didn't like you then.Oh, she does. She's just a bit of a... how do I put it...sociopath
Then she really didn't like you then.
I see it like this:
Phone = respond immediately.
Text = respond within an hour.
Email = respond within a day.
I don't think so. Its like email to me. I respond to a text when I get a moment.
You ignore them for a few minutes to give the illusion that you're doing something so you can answer with a "oh, I was busy doing X"
/foreveralone
I've seen this attitude elsewhere and I must ask: when did it become such a nuisance to answer your phone? I prefer spoken communication with the people in my life. Texting is very impersonal and imprecise.Phone - If you aren't my gf or my parents calling me what the fuck is your problem? You know I'm not answering unless I'm drunk or expecting a call. Seriously unless I love you and your life is at stake I have no desire to hear your voice and be unable to continue whatever I'm doing.
I warn every person that ever becomes my friend or that I start dating that I don't often carry my phone on me and hate texting. Most of them don't believe me and go through a circa 2 month "learning period" where they try to force their expectations of cell phone etiquette on me and then get the harsh lesson. I respond to received messages only when I have time and it's not rude to people in the world around me to pull out my phone and cut myself off from them. This often means hours before I'll get back to people. I had a girl get really really mad at me for the entire 2 month period of adjustment. She then learned, just like everyone else did, that I was serious when I said if it's that important call me and talk to me. Interpersonal relationships are a lot smoother for all involved if you just simply cut out text messaging or reduce it down to confirmation of already agreed upon information, like meet up places. You just find yourself up against some crazies if you stick to your guns on it.
I see it like this:
Phone = respond immediately.
Text = respond within an hour.
Email = respond within a day.
Also, depending on the situation and the company, I think it is actually rather rude to answer texts when you are enjoying the company of someone else. Anyone feel the same with this one?
Also, depending on the situation and the company, I think it is actually rather rude to answer texts when you are enjoying the company of someone else. Anyone feel the same with this one?
I'm beginning to realize a lot of people here (on GAF) are very strange/rude/dirty. To answer the TCs question yeah, it's kind of rude. You don't know the nature of the text, you don't know if they were in an area where they couldn't call because of reception, or maybe they were sending you a picture or a ton of possibilities. How hard is it to take 5 seconds to glance at your phone?
So you don't understand the difference between reading a text and responding to one? More to the point there are plenty of situations where i don't want to pull my phone out at all if it's even on me.
When i am at work i am on call with people constantly getting me to do or look at stuff, i don't need that feeling in my own time.
This guy knows what's up.No. You don't even have to answer a phone call if you don't want to.
It is even okay to turn off your phone or leave it at home or in another room.
This is a very narcissistic world view. To expect everyone to be at your beck and call just because technology allows it is ridiculous.I'm beginning to realize a lot of people here (on GAF) are very strange/rude/dirty. To answer the TCs question yeah, it's kind of rude. You don't know the nature of the text, you don't know if they were in an area where they couldn't call because of reception, or maybe they were sending you a picture or a ton of possibilities. How hard is it to take 5 seconds to glance at your phone?
Okay, reading and replying isn't the same as simply glancing, but my point is is that unless you're in a position where you can't reply or it'd be rude to or you KNOW it's something that doesn't need a quick response, why not? I still don't get why you assume people are only texting you to ask you to do something for them
What if you are having sex and you get a text message?I'm beginning to realize a lot of people here (on GAF) are very strange/rude/dirty. To answer the TCs question yeah, it's kind of rude. You don't know the nature of the text, you don't know if they were in an area where they couldn't call because of reception, or maybe they were sending you a picture or a ton of possibilities. How hard is it to take 5 seconds to glance at your phone?
What if you are having sex and you get a text message?
This is exactly my situation. I've had to make sure that the people who text me frequently understand that I'm (probably) not snubbing them when they don't receive an immediate reply to their message.My reception sucks and texts go into this weird limbo where I don't always get them, and when I do it's like 2-5 hours later. In other words, don't always assume.
I've seen this attitude elsewhere and I must ask: when did it become such a nuisance to answer your phone? I prefer spoken communication with the people in my life. Texting is very impersonal and imprecise.
Depends on the situation, really, but generally if someone wants to communicate with you and you have the time to answer it, then you should answer them.