• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Is it just me or is the edit posts function not working correctly?

Status
Not open for further replies.
ns5Rbhm.gif


Thought it was just me.
 
It's happening, you guys. First, the edit button. Then the preview post button. Then no posting gifs. Slowly but surely, they're taking away our forum freedoms.

Batten down the hatches, there's a storm coming.
 
The last few times I've tried to edit my posts, when I hit confirm it just does the little spinning circle loading thing and never actually solidifies the post. I have to refresh the page and it will have taken it anyway. I don't know, it's odd.

Lock if old I guess.
It works, just reload.
 
Been happening to me this week, as well. I figured it was probably the ancient browser they make us use at work.
 
It may be more useful to give a few details on the config that have that problem (if only some of them are concerned).

It happened to me too, and I'm running Opera 12.15 (rev 1748) on Windows 7.

*edit : just happened again. I edited to add a single character and it worked. I edited again to mention that it worked, and it got stuck. :P
 
I think we need to make our voices heard on this. What's Evilore's Twitter? #GAFnoEditBug

PS - Glad I'm not the only one this was happening to.
 
Snooping on the XHR response, I saw this.

Code:
<br /><strong>Warning</strong>:
Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <strong>[path]/includes/class_bbcode.php</strong>
on line <strong>550</strong><br />
<?xml . . .

It could be the cause of the error, since it causes invalid XML, which then doesn't get parsed when the script tries to use it.
 
Snooping on the XHR response, I saw this.

Code:
<br /><strong>Warning</strong>:
Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <strong>[path]/includes/class_bbcode.php</strong>
on line <strong>550</strong><br />
<?xml . . .

It could be the cause of the error, since it causes invalid XML, which then doesn't get parsed when the script tries to use it.

science
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom