• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Is Steam the savior of PC gaming??

I don't say that i game on pc anymore, i say that i game on steam. To me it's a platform with a name, like a gaming console.
 
faceless007 said:
Truth. I think of Steam as a massive double-edged sword; what we gain in convenience, discounts and exposure to indie games, we lose in DRM, loss of tangible goods, forced platform, and sometimes inability to use mods. I find myself worried about the future of PC gamers' ability to control their purchases...but I'm still gonna buy a ton from this sale, I know it.

I don't fully agree with this. What games have modability on the disc version but not on the Steam version? Also, you count the loss of a tangible good as a bad thing, I am fully decided that it is a great thing. I can't tell you how many times I've had to buy Starcraft or Diablo because I was itching to play it but couldn't find my copy (or I only had the disc and not the CD key). I love having my games (and CD keys) stored on their servers, so I don't have to keep track of every game I've bought in the last 15 years. Also, being able to download and play your entire steam library anywhere without limits (other than an online connection) is nothing short of amazing. You can't do that with a disc version of a game so easily.

If someone walked up to me and offered me "brand new game X" on my choice of disc or steam, I'd take the steam version without even needing to think about it. I do understand why people would want physical copies though. I realize that Steam isn't necessarily "better" because of the reasons I described. Rather, it just fits the way I like to do things more. If you prefer your games on discs, I think that's an equally valid choice.
 
don't forget that Steam is better for the environment.

plastic is made from petrol, which is going the way of the dinosaur. the sooner we move away from producing physical media the better.
 
Trying to install FEAR 2, get told Steam servers are too busy to "process my request". Finally get it installed and it insists on downloading a mandatory 900mb update and won't let me play until I do. Steam's nothing but stealth DRM. Anyone who pirated it got a far better product than what I'm stuck with.
 
It's gotten to the point where Steam/Impulse/GoG are over half of my game purchases. I just can't fathom wanting to clutter up a shelf when I can download a game as many times as needed without having to worry about keys and such. It's also an excellent way to grab indie games on the cheap, and have them all in one place. Compare that to four years ago when I rarely played a PC game that wasn't Battlefield, and it's a pretty easy case to make that it has completely reinvigorated my interest in PC gaming.

Unfortunately, there's still no System Shock or System Shock 2 on any of the Digital Download services, and I'm unwilling to pay the steep premium to get discs of those, so I get to wait for one of the stores to add it. And the old LucasArts adventure games.
 
Between Steam and Battle.net I think PC gaming will be a very cool place to be this gen. Consoles are missing out.

Personally I've been jumping ships every generation (PC -> SNES -> PC -> PS2 -> PC) and I think this is the right direction the market is taking. But this also means I'll be a supporter of the PS480 or whatever they end up calling them.
 
Zenith said:
Trying to install FEAR 2, get told Steam servers are too busy to "process my request". Finally get it installed and it insists on downloading a mandatory 900mb update and won't let me play until I do. Steam's nothing but stealth DRM.
Steam is very up-front about the fact that it IS DRM. That's the whole point. The thing everyone likes is that it's one of the friendliest DRM setups around.

The authentication servers are getting hit pretty hard right now so there's that.
 
Not to say you don't have a legitimate beef for not being able to play your game right now, but this is the busiest Steam has ever been.
 
I'm not quite sure if it's the savior of PC gaming, but it sure did a lot to get me into it. A few years back, I was mainly a console gamer who played PC occasionally (mainly Counter-Strike and Civilization), but now I'm mainly a PC gamer who only plays consoles when there is a big exclusive.
 
warbegins said:
don't forget that Steam is better for the environment.

plastic is made from petrol, which is going the way of the dinosaur. the sooner we move away from producing physical media the better.
Hard drives are still physical media and take energy to produce, you know.
 
Zenith said:
Trying to install FEAR 2, get told Steam servers are too busy to "process my request". Finally get it installed and it insists on downloading a mandatory 900mb update and won't let me play until I do. Steam's nothing but stealth DRM. Anyone who pirated it got a far better product than what I'm stuck with.

as cautious as i am of monopolies and intrusions on digital freedoms, a claim as reductionist and flawed as "nothing but stealth drm" relegates your dissent to old-man-yelling-at-clouds territory.

a shame, since steam opens alot of debates that both sides need representation of, something i'm having trouble doing as practically everything steam does, i want it to do. the lack of leverage over publishers is my main concern (leading to some frankly fucked up european pricing), but if anything can be taken from the accelerated abundance of steam sales, the market seems to be taking care of that on its own.

and we've already got one merrick.
 
evilchicken said:
I don't fully agree with this. What games have modability on the disc version but not on the Steam version? Also, you count the loss of a tangible good as a bad thing, I am fully decided that it is a great thing. I can't tell you how many times I've had to buy Starcraft or Diablo because I was itching to play it but couldn't find my copy (or I only had the disc and not the CD key). I love having my games (and CD keys) stored on their servers, so I don't have to keep track of every game I've bought in the last 15 years. Also, being able to download and play your entire steam library anywhere without limits (other than an online connection) is nothing short of amazing. You can't do that with a disc version of a game so easily.

If someone walked up to me and offered me "brand new game X" on my choice of disc or steam, I'd take the steam version without even needing to think about it. I do understand why people would want physical copies though. I realize that Steam isn't necessarily "better" because of the reasons I described. Rather, it just fits the way I like to do things more. If you prefer your games on discs, I think that's an equally valid choice.

off the top of my head morrowind (graphics extender), and kotor (widescreen mod).
basically anything can needs to futz around with the .exe depending on circumstances (but the script extenders that dll hook onto the exe for oblivion and fallout 3, work fine on the steam versions).
 
I wouldn't have bought a single game this year if not for steam. Because of Steam, I've bought probably close to 80 games. Then again, more than half of those were part of a bundle, but it still counts! I just finally started playing King's Bounty, and although the very first battle with a Dragon kicked my ass I'm already having a ton of fun with it.

If the download services for the consoles were close to comparable to steam, I wouldn't be nearly as afraid of a DD only future. MP3 players quickly got me over my need to have a physical copy of media, and now Steam makes me wish I never had to use a disc/cartridge again. I love it.
 
The other day our Internet was down and I wanted to play Braid. I started Steam in Offline mode and tried to launch Braid. Error: This game is not ready to play in offline mode. Steam literally prevented me from playing my purchased game because I wasn't online.

Just sayin'.
 
faceless007 said:
The other day our Internet was down and I wanted to play Braid. I started Steam in Offline mode and tried to launch Braid. Error: This game is not ready to play in offline mode. Steam literally prevented me from playing my purchased game because I wasn't online.

Just sayin'.
I think you need to launch the game at least once so Steam fully updates it before it'll work in offline mode.

I've tested offline mode a few times and I've never run into that problem but I've heard about it from others.

Good thing this sort of thing doesn't really bother me one way or the other. I can't remember the last time I didn't have an internet connection.
 
faceless007 said:
Hard drives are still physical media and take energy to produce, you know.
So? It's not like you don't need a hard drive if you have the CD as well. It's better for the environment if you use Steam because you don't need the CD or packaging. You still need a hard drive either way, so that point is kind of moot.
 
The point is saying we should move away from physical media is dumb because there's no such thing as non-physical media. There is no metaphysical higher form of existence on which your games can reside that isn't an object somewhere in the world that takes energy to make. It's a red herring.

And if you really want to help the environment, not buying mass-produced consumer electronics out of Chinese factories would probably be a better move than giving up CDs.
 
faceless007 said:
The point is saying we should move away from physical media is dumb because there's no such thing as non-physical media. There is no metaphysical higher form of existence on which your games can reside that isn't an object somewhere in the world that takes energy to make. It's a red herring.

And if you really want to help the environment, not buying mass-produced consumer electronics out of Chinese factories would probably be a better move than giving up CDs
.


I'm guessing the CDs have to be manufactured too. Probably in China.
 
warbegins said:
don't forget that Steam is better for the environment.

plastic is made from petrol, which is going the way of the dinosaur. the sooner we move away from producing physical media the better.

i wonder which one has more of an environmental impact. Housing enough servers capable of providing thousands of gigabytes of downloads to over 13 million users ends up producing emmissions (thats why Google is doing the green offset stuff because 200 million Google searches per day ends up releasing a considerable amount of CO2).

With physical media you have the production factories that produce a run and then eventually stop. The plastics used in making games probably has less impact than say a box of cereal, bottled water or tubes of toothpaste because afaik most people dont throw their games into the garbage when done.. i cant find exact numbers but it seems reasonable to me that most unwanted games are eventually sold until they make their way into somebodies collection.
 
faceless007 said:
I'm not the one who said we could actually move away from producing physical media.
You ever heard the phrase 'the better of two evils'?

Think of it like this, you can either produce a hard drive that can hold 100 games or produce 100 dvds with manuals + dvd case, which do you think causes the most pollution to produce?

Edit: what the hell, now I'm being stupid too, you'd need the hard drive even IF you produced the dvds. Not producing the DVD games, manuals and boxes would still be a big benefit to the environment.
 
Number 2 said:
i wonder which one has more of an environmental impact. Housing enough servers capable of providing thousands of gigabytes of downloads to over 13 million users ends up producing emmissions (thats why Google is doing the green offset stuff because 200 million Google searches per day ends up releasing a considerable amount of CO2).

With physical media you have the production factories that produce a run and then eventually stop. The plastics used in making games probably has less impact than say a box of cereal, bottled water or tubes of toothpaste because afaik most people dont throw their games into the garbage when done.. i cant find exact numbers but it seems reasonable to me that most unwanted games are eventually sold until they make their way into somebodies collection.

Well you should also add up the shipping costs (energy requirements) and power costs to the stores that sell the games. Sure, server farms use up a lot of energy but if we are going to speculate I would say DD uses less energy overall. Remember all those storefronts also have servers running 24x7 for online purchases.
 
Hey let's have a ridiculous argument about environmental issues tangentially related to Steam instead of actually discussing the point.
 
Wickerbasket said:
Edit: what the hell, now I'm being stupid too, you'd need the hard drive even IF you produced the dvds. Not producing the DVD games, manuals and boxes would still be a big benefit to the environment.

I'll repeat what I said earlier: If you really care that much about making an environmental statement, you might not want to indulge in a hobby predicated on buying mass-produced power-hungry electronics from Chinese factories. This entire hobby is in no way amenable to living a green lifestyle. There are good reasons to prefer digital distribution over DVDs, but wanting to reduce your carbon footprint really isn't one of them.
 
epmode said:
Steam is very up-front about the fact that it IS DRM. That's the whole point. The thing everyone likes is that it's one of the friendliest DRM setups around.

The authentication servers are getting hit pretty hard right now so there's that.

so friendly I can't play my game. I can't think of a DRM system that's more restrictive. At least EA's authentication service means you can download a crack if you can't get access.

and besides I'm past the authentication phase, it wants to download the damn updates. How stupid is that to make it mandatory? Doesn't matter that I don't want to download 2 bonus MP maps, doesn't matter that with some games their patches add new problems, doesn't matter that games have worked just fine for years with people using different versions. Total PoS.
 
Zenith said:
so friendly I can't play my game. I can't think of a DRM system that's more restrictive. At least EA's authentication service means you can download a crack if you can't get access.

and besides I'm past the authentication phase, it wants to download the damn updates. How stupid is that to make it mandatory? Doesn't matter that I don't want to download 2 bonus MP maps, doesn't matter that with some games their patches add new problems, doesn't matter that games have worked just fine for years with people using different versions. Total PoS.

I think there's an option called "don't update this game" under properties. Maybe that helps.

EDIT: Right-click the game -> Properties -> Updates -> Do not automatically update this game
 
Zenith said:
Trying to install FEAR 2, get told Steam servers are too busy to "process my request". Finally get it installed and it insists on downloading a mandatory 900mb update and won't let me play until I do. Steam's nothing but stealth DRM. Anyone who pirated it got a far better product than what I'm stuck with.
It's 5am. It's not like you'd be able to buy Fear 2 from any retail store right now either.
 
I think there's an option called "don't update this game" under properties. Maybe that helps.

EDIT: Right-click the game -> Properties -> Updates -> Do not automatically update this game

Thanks for the assist but it's still bringing up the download bar when I hit launch even though the games status list claims it's not downloading anything.

Slavik81 said:
It's 5am. It's not like you'd be able to buy Fear 2 from any retail store right now either.

...

You have heard of the concept of other countries right? It's mid day over here. And it's not about being able to buy, it's about being able to play. I could play any of my non-steam games at 5am.
 
Slavik81 said:
It's 5am. It's not like you'd be able to buy Fear 2 from any retail store right now either.


:lol

Please, for the sake of my faith in humanity, please tell me you were joking.
 
A friend just gifted me Kings Bounty Gold Edition on Steam, and it did the thing where servers are too busy, but finally took after the 15th try. In my opinion though, if it wasn't for steam, I wouldn't be much of a PC gamer at all, I was never into PC games until I got my new laptop, then just mostly played WoW but got tired of it and had no other source to go to, until my friend told me about Steam, now I play it more than my PS3 or 360 most days. Steam rules in my opinion.
 
Top Bottom