• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Is there an MBA. graduate, doctorate crowd here on GAF?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In my opinion going to research something the you are really interested in is vital.
You get shit done when you have natural interest on the topic.

Otherwise I do not know Bio so it's difficult to say. Dennis is right about impact factor. You get good material for the thesis when your work is scrutinized properly. Aim high.
 
Anyone here have (or is working towards) an MBA? Strangely enough, a FB post I just saw inspired me to rethink this line of study (I've always had an interest in Finance and the inner workings). Just wondering how strenuous the course-work is (I've thought about it for awhile but the cost issue has always deterred me).
 
Easter holidays. Sunday. 15:00.

Sitting in the lab writing, but I am happy because the first full draft for pre-examination is almost finished. I feel like the spring arriving here is also arriving in my body. I feel relief.

Pages and pages of cluttered and totally confusing text is finally coming together as a coherent package. I write here because I need to share my small personal joy. Feels good man. Real good. Deadline is 15.4.2015 and now I know I can make it.
 
I'm exactly 5 classes away from a MEd program in higher education administration at Northeastern University. I'll have the program done by this December if all goes well.

Been working in more entry level areas in the higher Ed field for about 4 years now and will be hoping this helps with moving up to management level areas. One of the cool projects I'm working on now is establishing the international admissions process at my university which was just created like 3 years ago. So hopefully things like that are seen as valuable experience and a solid educational foundation.

NU is I think in the low 40s as a university in US News rankings, but the education grad program specifically isn't ranked or anything. But regardless, the idea is to take a break from school for a few years and keep gaining experience after the masters is done then later consider an EdD or JD.
 
I'm exactly 5 classes away from a MEd program in higher education administration at Northeastern University. I'll have the program done by this December if all goes well.

Been working in more entry level areas in the higher Ed field for about 4 years now and will be hoping this helps with moving up to management level areas. One of the cool projects I'm working on now is establishing the international admissions process at my university which was just created like 3 years ago. So hopefully things like that are seen as valuable experience and a solid educational foundation.

NU is I think in the low 40s as a university in US News rankings, but the education grad program specifically isn't ranked or anything. But regardless, the idea is to take a break from school for a few years and keep gaining experience after the masters is done then later consider an EdD or JD.

A lot of abbreviations I have no idea of.
 
I'm exactly 5 classes away from a MEd program in higher education administration at Northeastern University. I'll have the program done by this December if all goes well.

Been working in more entry level areas in the higher Ed field for about 4 years now and will be hoping this helps with moving up to management level areas. One of the cool projects I'm working on now is establishing the international admissions process at my university which was just created like 3 years ago. So hopefully things like that are seen as valuable experience and a solid educational foundation.

NU is I think in the low 40s as a university in US News rankings, but the education grad program specifically isn't ranked or anything. But regardless, the idea is to take a break from school for a few years and keep gaining experience after the masters is done then later consider an EdD or JD.

A lot of abbreviations I have no idea of.

MEd: Master of Education

Ed: Education

NU: Northeastern University

US: United States

EdD: Doctor of Education

JD: Juris Doctor

I knew this all without googling. I've been in school too long.

EDIT: Foiled again!
 
Haha, thanks. I am not from the US and study in a different field so the terms I use are too. Or maybe I am just...uneducated.

Juris Doctor seems to be for law. That's cool, but why would one want to be a shark?
 
Haha, thanks. I am not from the US and study in a different field so the terms I use are too. Or maybe I am just...uneducated.

Juris Doctor seems to be for law. That's cool, but why would one want to be a shark?

There are multiple reasons why one would study law. Crafting new policy, working in different kinds of fields, defending groups of people from predators, etc.

Not all JD's work in the sexy big wig law firms working on murder and fraud cases.
 
There are multiple reasons why one would study law. Crafting new policy, working in different kinds of fields, defending groups of people from predators, etc.

Not all JD's work in the sexy big wig law firms working on murder and fraud cases.

My views are based on TV. TV does not lie.
 
There are multiple reasons why one would study law. Crafting new policy, working in different kinds of fields, defending groups of people from predators, etc.

Not all JD's work in the sexy big wig law firms working on murder and fraud cases.
Yeah this would be the thinking. Public higher education is very political and complex. So I would want to use it to help my argument skills essentially. Would have little desire to work in courts or general counsel.

The masters will help with a deeper understanding the industry and development of policy.

Edit: Double post, but meh. Damn mobile.
 
I had looked at Northeastern when I was looking to start a PhD program in Education back in 2010.
It seemed like a great place... but I wasn't going to be able to get it to work given my situation at the time.

I really wish I had went there >.>
 
I had looked at Northeastern when I was looking to start a PhD program in Education back in 2010.
It seemed like a great place... but I wasn't going to be able to get it to work given my situation at the time.

I really wish I had went there >.>
Yeah it's rough trying to keep up. And that is in their online program. I actually work in FL, so I needed a work friendly program. Kind of discovered NU by accident.
 
Yeah it's rough trying to keep up. And that is in their online program. I actually work in FL, so I needed a work friendly program. Kind of discovered NU by accident.

I really wish more places had more online programs during my time in college (started my Bachelor's in 2001, and Master's in 2007).

It would have made my life so much easier - as someone who didn't drive - to not have to waste 2-3 hours on the bus each day during my Bachelor's, and 4-5 hours on the bus each day during my Master's >.>
 
It's probably been mentioned a bunch of times, but for anyone pursuing an advanced degree in anything science or computer related, you really should be looking to jump on the Data Science gravy train. The job market is outstanding, growing rapidly, and with no signs of slowing down.
 
I started grad school in January at a large university. I finished undergrad back in 2013 with a BS in CompSci (minored in Astronomy).

Just a Master's. No plans to go for a PhD at this time.
 
Anyone here have (or is working towards) an MBA? Strangely enough, a FB post I just saw inspired me to rethink this line of study (I've always had an interest in Finance and the inner workings). Just wondering how strenuous the course-work is (I've thought about it for awhile but the cost issue has always deterred me).

I have one. Basically all depends on exactly what you are looking to do. As long as it will allow you do what you want to do, then it makes sense. Just getting an MBA without a game plan isn't a good idea. Also finance is just one aspect of it, there are plenty of other focuses.

I found the course work to be pretty challenging, there's a lot of teamwork, a lot of presentations, papers, case studies. A lot of collaboration, yes, so you have to like people.

I also did it while working full time, and being newly married, so it was very very challenging to juggle everything.

I did mine to change my career, and I was able to, so it worked for me.
 
Anyone here have (or is working towards) an MBA? Strangely enough, a FB post I just saw inspired me to rethink this line of study (I've always had an interest in Finance and the inner workings). Just wondering how strenuous the course-work is (I've thought about it for awhile but the cost issue has always deterred me).

I mean you could do an MBA to learn more about finance but there are probably programs that deal primarily with finance if that is your sole focus. If you're looking to change careers and you can get into a top-20 or so full-time program then an MBA makes sense. Depending on your job/industry it can even provide a salary bump if you're not switching. The important thing is to have a plan A and B so that you're not wasting time and money.

I'm personally a career switcher that will be graduating from a top-10 MBA next month and I just got an offer for over twice as much as I made prior to the program along with 2 more interviews lined up this week. It's not a bad route if you do it right.
 
BOULDER, Colo. — ONCE upon a time in America, baby boomers paid for college with the money they made from their summer jobs. Then, over the course of the next few decades, public funding for higher education was slashed. These radical cuts forced universities to raise tuition year after year, which in turn forced the millennial generation to take on crushing educational debt loads, and everyone lived unhappily ever after.

This is the story college administrators like to tell when they’re asked to explain why, over the past 35 years, college tuition at public universities has nearly quadrupled, to $9,139 in 2014 dollars. It is a fairy tale in the worst sense, in that it is not merely false, but rather almost the inverse of the truth.

...

By contrast, a major factor driving increasing costs is the constant expansion of university administration. An analysis by a professor at California Polytechnic University, Pomona, found that, while the total number of full-time faculty members in the C.S.U. system grew from 11,614 to 12,019 between 1975 and 2008, the total number of administrators grew from 3,800 to 12,183 — a 221 percent increase.

The rapid increase in college enrollment can be defended by intellectually respectable arguments. Even the explosion in administrative personnel is, at least in theory, defensible. On the other hand, there are no valid arguments to support the recent trend toward seven-figure salaries for high-ranking university administrators, unless one considers evidence-free assertions about “the market” to be intellectually rigorous.

Full Article @NY times.

Imo, this article deserves its own thread.
 
I mean you could do an MBA to learn more about finance but there are probably programs that deal primarily with finance if that is your sole focus. If you're looking to change careers and you can get into a top-20 or so full-time program then an MBA makes sense. Depending on your job/industry it can even provide a salary bump if you're not switching. The important thing is to have a plan A and B so that you're not wasting time and money.

I'm personally a career switcher that will be graduating from a top-10 MBA next month and I just got an offer for over twice as much as I made prior to the program along with 2 more interviews lined up this week. It's not a bad route if you do it right.

I want to echo what Bay Maximus has said and perhaps go a bit further. An MBA has very little to do with learning. It is for job prospects, networking, and actions outside of the classroom rather than inside. I'm sure there will be a few nuggets of knowledge picked up here and there, but if you are trying to obtain a deep understanding of finance, perhaps a Masters in Finance makes more sense.

A full-time MBA is good for taking something you have some skills in already, tweaking it a bit with a couple resume boosting activities, and using that new resume and the school network to get a job from an employer and industry that needs a large amount of MBAs (Investment Banking, Consulting, Marketing are the big ones).

A part-time MBA is good for taking some normal skillset you have (engineering) and adding on general business lingo so that you can actually understand what management wants out of your division. You will likely stay in the same company and in the same division, but you may then have the chance to manage the operations of the group.

A general interest in finance would not be satiated by either one of these.

For the full-time MBA route, you must lay out how the MBA can realistically get you from your prior job to your current job. Look into the pivots people make post-MBA from your current employer or from your current industry. Where do they go, what do they do, etc. If you cannot lay out a 5 year plan and clear strategy throughout, you will not get in to a full-time program worth going to (basically the US top 10, which I have listed in this thread previously). For those that can convince an admissions committee and then convince an employer, it is probably the quickest way to increase your earning potential exponentially. Both my roommate and I will be making about 3.6x our pre-MBA total compensation in our first year post-MBA with rapid salary growth annually thereafter, and that is pretty typical for the field we are pursuing (MBAs are commonly fed into the industry).

Note: Solid career switches into 'business' roles are possible from Masters in Finance or Masters in Accountancy programs, but success varies by program. You'll be making 5 digits in salary to start with the max potential for mid 6 digits by mid 40s (assuming you start the program around 24-26), but for many that could be great compared to what they have now. In a sense, you are hitting reset on your career in the case of either of these, rather than trying to pivot with the MBA. Perhaps prior knowledge can be helpful in some cases (eg Electrical Engineering when in equity research covering the semiconductor industry), but the standard would be to not expect your prior career to play a big role. Some MBA programs are really Masters in Finance or Masters in Accountancy programs in disguise; pay attention to employers, post-program compensation, % employed in said industry, # of students sent to each desired company if you want to be able to see if your MAcc or MFin program (openly or disguised) are strong in your desired field, and compare the cost and time commitment (and opportunity cost of additional income if applicable) to future earnings to see if its worth it. The easiest way to start the hunt for a program is focus in on cities that are strong at what you do. Don't expect to get a world class Masters in Finance degree in Kansas; instead, aim for Boston. Masters in Accountancy programs often are a bit more spread out, but again, focus in on where the Big 4 Accounting FIrms have a big presence (think key growing metropolitans like Boston, Atlanta, Houston, NYC, LA, SF) - the regional offices for the Big 4 don't go that far from their offices to recruit. Avoid anything that is not Finance or Accounting related if you are going this route - no marketing or strategy. Data Analytics would probably do awesome right now, but I am not familiar with that area.
 
It's probably been mentioned a bunch of times, but for anyone pursuing an advanced degree in anything science or computer related, you really should be looking to jump on the Data Science gravy train. The job market is outstanding, growing rapidly, and with no signs of slowing down.
What's the difference with just studying statistics?

I really wish there were more joint Ph.D programs. I really want to do Sociology and Statistics but pretty much only John Hopkins offers a joint program.
 
I want to echo what Bay Maximus has said and perhaps go a bit further. An MBA has very little to do with learning. It is for job prospects, networking, and actions outside of the classroom rather than inside. I'm sure there will be a few nuggets of knowledge picked up here and there, but if you are trying to obtain a deep understanding of finance, perhaps a Masters in Finance makes more sense.

A full-time MBA is good for taking something you have some skills in already, tweaking it a bit with a couple resume boosting activities, and using that new resume and the school network to get a job from an employer and industry that needs a large amount of MBAs (Investment Banking, Consulting, Marketing are the big ones).

A part-time MBA is good for taking some normal skillset you have (engineering) and adding on general business lingo so that you can actually understand what management wants out of your division. You will likely stay in the same company and in the same division, but you may then have the chance to manage the operations of the group.

A general interest in finance would not be satiated by either one of these.

For the full-time MBA route, you must lay out how the MBA can realistically get you from your prior job to your current job. Look into the pivots people make post-MBA from your current employer or from your current industry. Where do they go, what do they do, etc. If you cannot lay out a 5 year plan and clear strategy throughout, you will not get in to a full-time program worth going to (basically the top 10). For those that can convince an admissions committee and then convince an employer, it is probably the quickest way to increase your earning potential exponentially. Both my roommate and I will be making about 3.6x our pre-MBA total compensation in our first year post-MBA with rapid salary growth annually thereafter, and that is pretty typical for the field we are pursuing (MBAs are commonly fed into the industry).

I don't think part time programs have to be about advancing in your current company. Lots of major employers recruit directly with part time programs and their students because it offers them a slightly different student body to pick from. I finally got word back and got accepted to USC Marshall and am wait listed at UCLA Anderson. I'm hoping to pivot my career from tech/music entertainment (which I'm in now) to tech/video games post graduation.

Did you ever pursue Certificates during your tenure at NYU? USC offers a Certificate in Technology Commercialization which you can use your electives for, which I'd like to do.
 
BOULDER, Colo. — ONCE upon a time in America, baby boomers paid for college with the money they made from their summer jobs. Then, over the course of the next few decades, public funding for higher education was slashed. These radical cuts forced universities to raise tuition year after year, which in turn forced the millennial generation to take on crushing educational debt loads, and everyone lived unhappily ever after.

This is the story college administrators like to tell when they’re asked to explain why, over the past 35 years, college tuition at public universities has nearly quadrupled, to $9,139 in 2014 dollars. It is a fairy tale in the worst sense, in that it is not merely false, but rather almost the inverse of the truth.

...

By contrast, a major factor driving increasing costs is the constant expansion of university administration. An analysis by a professor at California Polytechnic University, Pomona, found that, while the total number of full-time faculty members in the C.S.U. system grew from 11,614 to 12,019 between 1975 and 2008, the total number of administrators grew from 3,800 to 12,183 — a 221 percent increase.

The rapid increase in college enrollment can be defended by intellectually respectable arguments. Even the explosion in administrative personnel is, at least in theory, defensible. On the other hand, there are no valid arguments to support the recent trend toward seven-figure salaries for high-ranking university administrators, unless one considers evidence-free assertions about “the market” to be intellectually rigorous.

Full Article @NY times.

Imo, this article deserves its own thread.
Eh... staff salaries are what percentage of a university's total budget? A few percentage points? I mean larger universities can have operating budgets of well over a billion dollars a year.

And it's not like a large percentage of administrative staff are even in the six figure range.
 
It's probably been mentioned a bunch of times, but for anyone pursuing an advanced degree in anything science or computer related, you really should be looking to jump on the Data Science gravy train. The job market is outstanding, growing rapidly, and with no signs of slowing down.

I mean I'm jumping on anything statistics related right now, but I'm not sure how "big data" if that's what you're referring to would really help me.
 
I'm getting an MS in CS, if that counts.

It's a bit of a different path than what I had in mind, but I think it's better.


That's true. :\

Cool stuff. Haven't made up my mind between a master's next year or just go balls out on professional certifications.
 
I don't think part time programs have to be about advancing in your current company. Lots of major employers recruit directly with part time programs and their students because it offers them a slightly different student body to pick from. I finally got word back and got accepted to USC Marshall and am wait listed at UCLA Anderson. I'm hoping to pivot my career from tech/music entertainment (which I'm in now) to tech/video games post graduation.

Did you ever pursue Certificates during your tenure at NYU? USC offers a Certificate in Technology Commercialization which you can use your electives for, which I'd like to do.

The frequency of employers trying to pull from the part-time pools of MBA programs is indeed increasing, but it's a risky game to play. One should at least approach the part-time program with the initial goal of advancing up the chain in their current employer. Ideally, your employer has a history of promoting those with part-time MBAs and pays for the program. If a fantastic opportunity comes along that one-ups your current employer, definitely take it. I wouldn't advise anyone to rely on a part-time program leading to switching companies though. I especially would advise against treating a part-time program like a full-time program (not working, or putting more effort on recruiting than work). If you decide to pay for a part-time program on your own, you have to be okay with it possibly meaning nothing for your career. Company-switches are definitely far more of an exception rather than rule among the Langone (NYU part-time MBA) students I know that they ended up with a new employer during or immediately after business school.

Stern gives the option to pursue no concentration at all if you prefer. I haven't seen any benefit to school certificates or concentrations in the field I am pursuing. Most of our employers (at least in finance) aren't approaching us because of a particular topic we teach extraordinarily well. Despite our prowess in finance, the investment banks stuck mostly to giving internship offers to people with a prior finance or accounting background. They made a couple exceptions for veterans, women and minorities, but everyone else had some finance in their background.

Congrats on Marshall, and good luck with Anderson. Have you reached out to any alumni or current students at Anderson? Perhaps they can put you in touch with people who were in the same situation when applying who could help you out. Current MBA students are more than willing to help anyone who reaches out. As for Marshall, if I remember correctly they can provide a fantastic real estate education. Is that part of the MBA program?

I mean I'm jumping on anything statistics related right now, but I'm not sure how "big data" if that's what you're referring to would really help me.

Simply because that is what companies want. They want someone educated on how to make use of all the data they're collecting on their customers. The more you can tell them based off of whatever analysis you can perform on massive amounts of customer data, the hotter the commodity you are right now with businesses. Its a very hot topic at school right now. I think Stern is even starting its own separate program now focusing in just on this.
 
Nah, pretty much most people from my company went to NYU part time and switched companies, Big 4 or tech (Google/Verizon etc)

I did the same, but went the Banking route. You just gotta be able to talk, with my kind of experience and sharpness, its a cinch.
 
What's the difference with just studying statistics?

I really wish there were more joint Ph.D programs. I really want to do Sociology and Statistics but pretty much only John Hopkins offers a joint program.

Traditional statistics seek to extract specific information from relative small data sets. With the huge databases and processing power we have now, we now are trying to figure out what we can extract from such data sets.
 
I mean I'm jumping on anything statistics related right now, but I'm not sure how "big data" if that's what you're referring to would really help me.

"Big Data" is just kind of a buzzword. Any combination of statistics, research, and programming, will serve you very well.

What's the difference with just studying statistics?

It's highly debatable whether there is a difference. At least where I work, people coming from advanced degree programs other than Masters of Statistics programs tend to have a more functional programming background and experience with larger data sets than traditional stats programs.


Overall, just trying to couple any science or math PhD or masters with a strong programming background is extremely valuable.
 
Traditional statistics seek to extract specific information from relative small data sets. With the huge databases and processing power we have now, we now are trying to figure out what we can extract from such data sets.
Ah, okay, so it's not something you'd normally find in a Statistics program? Or maybe just a course or two instead of the focus?
 
Ah, okay, so it's not something you'd normally find in a Statistics program? Or maybe just a course or two instead of the focus?

Big Data is a broad term, I am sure you can find plenty of electives in a Stats program. Big Data could just be the platform and processing engines of data, and architecture of the database structures. Or how you program to extract data from large databases etc.

Stats is math. There are platforms that allow stats processing on "Big Data". Big Data is more architecture/modeling/processing/programming related. Basically if you are doing PhD in stats, keep at it, it'll serve well, Big Data you can pick up on the job.
 
Ah, okay, so it's not something you'd normally find in a Statistics program? Or maybe just a course or two instead of the focus?

Is a relative undeveloped field, so I don't think there's such a big separation atm. Although some programs have already appeared, specially under the umbrella of Data Science, which as of now is Computer Science + (traditional) Statistics.

I have studying non-parametric computational statistical methods for a time now, but at least with the group people I'm working with, we are just starting. The inference algorithms I'm using with the data sets I'm building were published last year, we (well, I) are not even sure if they are up to the task.
 
The frequency of employers trying to pull from the part-time pools of MBA programs is indeed increasing, but it's a risky game to play. One should at least approach the part-time program with the initial goal of advancing up the chain in their current employer. Ideally, your employer has a history of promoting those with part-time MBAs and pays for the program. If a fantastic opportunity comes along that one-ups your current employer, definitely take it. I wouldn't advise anyone to rely on a part-time program leading to switching companies though. I especially would advise against treating a part-time program like a full-time program (not working, or putting more effort on recruiting than work). If you decide to pay for a part-time program on your own, you have to be okay with it possibly meaning nothing for your career. Company-switches are definitely far more of an exception rather than rule among the Langone (NYU part-time MBA) students I know that they ended up with a new employer during or immediately after business school.

Stern gives the option to pursue no concentration at all if you prefer. I haven't seen any benefit to school certificates or concentrations in the field I am pursuing. Most of our employers (at least in finance) aren't approaching us because of a particular topic we teach extraordinarily well. Despite our prowess in finance, the investment banks stuck mostly to giving internship offers to people with a prior finance or accounting background. They made a couple exceptions for veterans, women and minorities, but everyone else had some finance in their background.

Congrats on Marshall, and good luck with Anderson. Have you reached out to any alumni or current students at Anderson? Perhaps they can put you in touch with people who were in the same situation when applying who could help you out. Current MBA students are more than willing to help anyone who reaches out. As for Marshall, if I remember correctly they can provide a fantastic real estate education. Is that part of the MBA program?



Simply because that is what companies want. They want someone educated on how to make use of all the data they're collecting on their customers. The more you can tell them based off of whatever analysis you can perform on massive amounts of customer data, the hotter the commodity you are right now with businesses. Its a very hot topic at school right now. I think Stern is even starting its own separate program now focusing in just on this.

Thanks for the feedback. Both Marshall and Anderson informational sessions stressed that they are seeing an almost even 50/50 split for progression vs. Switching. It could be totally dependent on geography too. People are not exactly loyal out here when it comes to work, so switching companies is very prominent. Disney, Apple, Boeing, Warner Bros, Deloitte, Google all have recruiting events here for part time MBA class.

I suppose the career path you are gearing towards has a different focus from what an employer wants. Investment banking I would assume wants to know you are smart, quick on your feet, risk taker, and capable of committing to long hours. Corporate finance, business/ strategic development I feel like is a different avenue. An employer could potentially see value is certain course work I.e. Statistic emphasis for a business analytics role.

Marshall does offer Real Estate options as well, but I don't know much about it as I have little interest in the field.

As for Anderson they flat out told me I have great professional work experience and undergrad but they want a better GMAT score, specifically in quant. I understand that but it's frustrating considering I work as a Senior Financial Analyst and graduated with distinction in a quant major (Finance). The only thing else that could help is a promotion.
 
Thanks for the feedback. Both Marshall and Anderson informational sessions stressed that they are seeing an almost even 50/50 split for progression vs. Switching. It could be totally dependent on geography too. People are not exactly loyal out here when it comes to work, so switching companies is very prominent. Disney, Apple, Boeing, Warner Bros, Deloitte, Google all have recruiting events here for part time MBA class.

I suppose the career path you are gearing towards has a different focus from what an employer wants. Investment banking I would assume wants to know you are smart, quick on your feet, risk taker, and capable of committing to long hours. Corporate finance, business/ strategic development I feel like is a different avenue. An employer could potentially see value is certain course work I.e. Statistic emphasis for a business analytics role.

Marshall does offer Real Estate options as well, but I don't know much about it as I have little interest in the field.

As for Anderson they flat out told me I have great professional work experience and undergrad but they want a better GMAT score, specifically in quant. I understand that but it's frustrating considering I work as a Senior Financial Analyst and graduated with distinction in a quant major (Finance). The only thing else that could help is a promotion.

are you scheduled to retake the gmat during this wait list period? If quant is their big issue, perhaps prep for a bit, focus entirely on quant for the exam and see how it goes? If you show improvement on just the quant score to AdCom, it sounds like they could still extend an offer.
 
Doing a PhD in human-environment interactions. Working on my study questions now, likely I am going to focus on looking at opportunities for sustainable ecological development in the wake of climate disasters, i.e., opportunities emerging from disruption in systems and structure. This is a kind of synthesis of my previous study in ecology (M.Sc.) and history (M.Litt.).

Big Data...isn't that just working with large datasets which modern technology and methods have enabled us to gather, store and analyse/use on a larger scale than before? its a kind of funny buzzword at the moment...
 
Finished my ph-d in History of Science last year, currently working as a Researcher at the same University.
 
Thanks for the feedback. Both Marshall and Anderson informational sessions stressed that they are seeing an almost even 50/50 split for progression vs. Switching. It could be totally dependent on geography too. People are not exactly loyal out here when it comes to work, so switching companies is very prominent. Disney, Apple, Boeing, Warner Bros, Deloitte, Google all have recruiting events here for part time MBA class.

I suppose the career path you are gearing towards has a different focus from what an employer wants. Investment banking I would assume wants to know you are smart, quick on your feet, risk taker, and capable of committing to long hours. Corporate finance, business/ strategic development I feel like is a different avenue. An employer could potentially see value is certain course work I.e. Statistic emphasis for a business analytics role.

Marshall does offer Real Estate options as well, but I don't know much about it as I have little interest in the field.

As for Anderson they flat out told me I have great professional work experience and undergrad but they want a better GMAT score, specifically in quant. I understand that but it's frustrating considering I work as a Senior Financial Analyst and graduated with distinction in a quant major (Finance). The only thing else that could help is a promotion.

When they waitlisted you, did you request feedback and is that what they told you?
 
For those currently in Full Time MBA programs, can you lay down some Do's and Don'ts for incoming first years? Would be greatly appreciated.
 
Big Data is a broad term, I am sure you can find plenty of electives in a Stats program. Big Data could just be the platform and processing engines of data, and architecture of the database structures. Or how you program to extract data from large databases etc.

Stats is math. There are platforms that allow stats processing on "Big Data". Big Data is more architecture/modeling/processing/programming related. Basically if you are doing PhD in stats, keep at it, it'll serve well, Big Data you can pick up on the job.

Is a relative undeveloped field, so I don't think there's such a big separation atm. Although some programs have already appeared, specially under the umbrella of Data Science, which as of now is Computer Science + (traditional) Statistics.

I have studying non-parametric computational statistical methods for a time now, but at least with the group people I'm working with, we are just starting. The inference algorithms I'm using with the data sets I'm building were published last year, we (well, I) are not even sure if they are up to the task.
Thanks for the info you two. I'm still in my undergrad, but I haven't decided what kind of Ph.D program I'm applying to yet. I love Statistics, Computer Science, and Sociology. And I feel like I'm equally skilled at all of them. I have more experience with sociology research just because of how my college is structured and what programs it offers, but I don't want to discount comp sci and stats because of that. I just wish I could do everything. :(
 
Cool stuff. Haven't made up my mind between a master's next year or just go balls out on professional certifications.
It depends how long the program is.

Mine will take about three years since I had to take some prerequisites. -__-

Thanks for the info you two. I'm still in my undergrad, but I haven't decided what kind of Ph.D program I'm applying to yet. I love Statistics, Computer Science, and Sociology. And I feel like I'm equally skilled at all of them. I have more experience with sociology research just because of how my college is structured and what programs it offers, but I don't want to discount comp sci and stats because of that. I just wish I could do everything. :(
I went soc -> cs.

I don't mind it, but I don't know so far that I can combine it unless I do sociology of computer network stuff. which my school doesn't even touch.
 
I'm curious to see if anyone has gotten a graduate degree in either Public Health or International Relations. I'm debating between the two, since I want my career to be focus on the international level, preferably with the government. Can anyone who has done either give me their insight on the program and job prospects?

To clarify now, I will have at least two years of government international health development work experience by the time I enter graduate school.
 
For those currently in Full Time MBA programs, can you lay down some Do's and Don'ts for incoming first years? Would be greatly appreciated.

Do:

Take advantage of networking opportunities both before the program and during.

Be open to different experiences when exploring employment opportunities (unless you're sponsored or something)

Make sure your resume, linkedin and all that jazz is ready to go as soon as possible.

Ensure that you have comfortable living arrangements sooner than later.

Don't:

Be a gunner unless you know the company/industry likes that kind of thing.

Burn bridges

Sweat it
 
MA in Philosophy. Followed with a Masters of Public Administration for employability.

Master of Public Health or IR? Go with Public Health. IR is overcrowded AFAIK.
 
MA in Philosophy. Followed with a Masters of Public Administration for employability.

Master of Public Health or IR? Go with Public Health. IR is overcrowded AFAIK.

Was the philosophy for your own interests or was it originally for improving employability as well?
 
Do:

Take advantage of networking opportunities both before the program and during.

Be open to different experiences when exploring employment opportunities (unless you're sponsored or something)

Make sure your resume, linkedin and all that jazz is ready to go as soon as possible.

Ensure that you have comfortable living arrangements sooner than later.

Don't:

Be a gunner unless you know the company/industry likes that kind of thing.

Burn bridges

Sweat it

Can you expand on the gunner part? And don't burn bridges with your current employer or just in general during business school? Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom