In Europe didn't exist the 20 gb model. Only 60 gb models were sold here at launch.
I stand corrected...
In Europe didn't exist the 20 gb model. Only 60 gb models were sold here at launch.
In Europe didn't exist the 20 gb model. Only 60 gb models were sold here at launch.
This has thrown me for a loop. Wikipedia says you're correct but I'm absolutely certain that the 20GB was available here in the UK because I wanted to switch my order when I saw the all-black finish in the shop.
.....woah.
He was talking about Europe.
I'm wondering about the Basic.
What was Nintendo's logical thinking about their decision to release a $300 bare bones system with no "hook" game included (like Wii Sports/Nintendo Land) on launch day next to a sku with a much better value proposition?
I'm also wondering if on Christmas Eve wether or not there will be any Wii U sku's left on the shelves (white or black).
What he says is true...
The best sales launch for a console in the UK goes to the PS3...but the following week/s the sales were pitiful. Then there was all that business with regards to cancelled pre-orders which iirc was like 20-40 thousand, which was blamed on people hoping to cash in on e-bay sales from mass sell-outs.
This never happened because Sony supplied Europe and the UK very well for the demand...and so at no point in the UK at least was the PS3 sold out. People who wanted to e-bay PS3's realized this a few days before launch when places like GAME etc were still taking pre-orders and pretty much all retailers across the board were still taking orders.
Of course Sony still pretended like it was sold out...maybe they were talking about the 20gb model...which was indeed rare to find.
I'm wondering about the Basic.
What was Nintendo's logical thinking about their decision to release a $300 bare bones system with no "hook" game included (like Wii Sports/Nintendo Land) on launch day next to a sku with a much better value proposition?
I'm also wondering if on Christmas Eve wether or not there will be any Wii U sku's left on the shelves (white or black).
In Italy shops are full of Wii U, any models...
I assume it's two-fold. One reason is that they wanted a SKU closer in price to past consoles. I imagine "for as little as $299" was important to them in not feeling like they had released too expensive a console. Secondly, I don't necessarily know if I agree that the Deluxe offered a much better value proposition. I agree that it is if you're buying Nintendo Land anyway, but aside from that I don't think it's some sort of no-brainer call. I personally didn't care that much about Nintendo Land, so on launch day when I saw Basics in stock I just got that.
This has thrown me for a loop. Wikipedia says you're correct but I'm absolutely certain that the 20GB was available here in the UK because I wanted to switch my order when I saw the all-black finish in the shop.
.....woah.
Ok but there has to be a source. I want to see if it was actual sales and not based on a dollar amount which would be inflated due to the cost of the unit itself.
The convenience of a charging cradle would be worth $20 to me.Plastic stands are not worth 20 fucking bucks and NintendoLand is not really worth 60 bucks.
I found one for sale under a rock.
UK did get the 20gb model. surprised to hear than Europe didn't.
Consumers are without question averse to the basic SKU, but NOT solely by virtue of the fact that it is "barebones." Quite simply, Nintendo should consider dropping the price of the $300 basic set to $250 in the U.S. I could see the premium, in theory, remaining at its $350 price point. This minor alteration in pricing structure could really assist retailers in moving the apparently stagnant basic SKU. Premium set appears to be selling briskly, at the very least. Consumers, for the time being, see a solid value proposition here.
The people who think it is a much better value clearly do not have much of a clue about what Nintendo is really trying to do here. It's just like every asshole company, charge more for something of very little value. They do a better job than Apple or tablet vendors because it's only 50 more for the extra, albeit still very tiny, storage and the game. The problem is that it's Nintendo defining the value proposition. Plastic stands are not worth 20 fucking bucks and NintendoLand is not really worth 60 bucks. The price on the game is there just to get people to buy the deluxe. That's all fine and good if there are DX units in stock, but for a lot of places that is not the case. The end result is a lost sale if the customer is not willing to settle.
If they really wanted to release 2 SKUs they should have included the game in both because the Wii came with one and made the DX have more storage like 64GB. I wouldn't doubt that there are people out there who think about buying the thing, only see the white one, and get turned off by the fact that it does not include a game. The target market expects the fucking pack-in! I think it is just part of their terrible marketing. 2SKUs, high price, customer confusion, no in-store displays at 2nd level retailers such as Fry's
Putting aside the fact that the UK is a part of Europe: Are you sure about Sony actually every selling that PS3 in the UK? Some retailers certainly have accepted pre-orders for a 20GB model, but I can't find any reference to any PAL 20GB consoles actually being produced.
It was sold in the UK. Amazon had it listed as well as a various stores. I believe it was a limited model though.
Guess you learn something new every day - I wonder whether Sony was willing to sell them in limited quantities to appease retailers that had put up pre-order forms too early, or maybe the initial plan was to release a 20GB as well?
(Tying this back to the Wii U sales question: A model being rare seems to be something that hasn't happened so far with Nintendo's newest offering!)
Maybe Hamburg, but not in general. I see plenty here in Dortmund and even amazon isn't sold out.
"Sold out" never means you can't get it anywhere. Even when the Wii has been "sold out" in 2006 till 2008 constantly you are able to get them in some places at every time and sometimes at amazon.
Is this true? In Australia it's 300 for Basic and 69 for NL separate, whereas its 380 for Deluxe with NL, a saving of $11 going basic.Well...
1. If you were going to get Nintendoland anyway, than the Deluxe would be, in reality, a better value proposition because it would be cheaper than buying a Basic and Nintendoland separately.
I haven't been to the store recently, but Y2Kev linked me this earlier:
Speak for yourself. Imo nintendoland is worth more than 95% of all the 60 dollar games released this holiday. Content wise is packed to the brim and the production values are stellar. That is without taking into account the extra storage space and the delux store promotion.The people who think it is a much better value clearly do not have much of a clue about what Nintendo is really trying to do here. It's just like every asshole company, charge more for something of very little value. They do a better job than Apple or tablet vendors because it's only 50 more for the extra, albeit still very tiny, storage and the game. The problem is that it's Nintendo defining the value proposition. Plastic stands are not worth 20 fucking bucks and NintendoLand is not really worth 60 bucks. The price on the game is there just to get people to buy the deluxe. That's all fine and good if there are DX units in stock, but for a lot of places that is not the case. The end result is a lost sale if the customer is not willing to settle.
If they really wanted to release 2 SKUs they should have included the game in both because the Wii came with one and made the DX have more storage like 64GB. I wouldn't doubt that there are people out there who think about buying the thing, only see the white one, and get turned off by the fact that it does not include a game. The target market expects the fucking pack-in! I think it is just part of their terrible marketing. 2SKUs, high price, customer confusion, no in-store displays at 2nd level retailers such as Fry's
No Pikmin 3? W101?I absolutely believe that was the intention, but Nintendo is missing one extremely important ingredient to make it work: A lineup worthy of hype. I really like the system, but I can't recommend it to anyone looking at the 2013 lineup.
No Pikmin 3? W101?
The people who think it is a much better value clearly do not have much of a clue about what Nintendo is really trying to do here. It's just like every asshole company, charge more for something of very little value. They do a better job than Apple or tablet vendors because it's only 50 more for the extra, albeit still very tiny, storage and the game. The problem is that it's Nintendo defining the value proposition. Plastic stands are not worth 20 fucking bucks and NintendoLand is not really worth 60 bucks. The price on the game is there just to get people to buy the deluxe. That's all fine and good if there are DX units in stock, but for a lot of places that is not the case. The end result is a lost sale if the customer is not willing to settle.
iknow, when I first palyed with a demo station, both me and my partner were like wtf? A demo station that has no demos to play. NOA at its finest.
Nintendo didn't learn from the 3DS. I was going to say, "I can't believe Nintendo would be so stupid", but we all know how that goes.
They really really should have released the basic and deluxe at $250 and $300 respectively. I really believe that $50 difference makes it so WiiU's are hard to find and possibly sold out nationwide. At the very least through the holidays.
Also Nintendo should have included a $5 off coupon for Pikmin 3 in every console.