yes, any and all criticism of the Clinton Foundation was clearly *really* about her gender, because, uh, reasons
It's amusing to me how much you don't understand the satire.
yes, any and all criticism of the Clinton Foundation was clearly *really* about her gender, because, uh, reasons
But what happens when she elects herself Queen of the Chappaqua woods? How will politics ever be safe?
Wow this thread went to shit really quick
*puke*And dont get me started on Chelsea. Yes, shes a highly educated, well-spoken young woman with a lifelong front-row seat to politics and governance.
Huh? "Unique?" Because she tried... twice to be President? There ain't nothin' unique about that. Diamond Joe Biden did the same thing, yet no one says the same thing about him, about the whole inevitability thing (and many still would be happy to have him run, even with that). Not to mention the any number of Republican candidates that pretty much make a living off of campaigning for the Presidency every 4 years or so to sell books and stuff, which no one really seems to care about much either way. The only difference is how people treated it and reacted when Clinton did it compared to every other politician who had made multiple bids. Wonder what the difference is, that lead to those different reactions, and how it relates to this piece... Hmm...One thing that's kind of unique about Clinton is that she's had an air of inevitability going on 12 years now, and that's kind of off-putting.
Most failed candidates go back to their day jobs; Clinton's day job is running for president, at this point.
The last time a primary retread candidate won was George HW Bush and he was a one-termer.I can't remember the last time someone lost a primary and then ran in the next cycle. It's unheard of!
The last time a primary retread candidate won was George HW Bush and he was a one-termer.
96 - Bob Dole (1976), lost
00 - Al Gore (1988), lost
08 - John McCain (2000), lost
12 - Mitt Romney (2008), lost
16 - Hillary Clinton (2008), lost
You may want to rethink your snark, champ.
It's amusing to me how much you don't understand the satire.
The last time a primary retread candidate won was George HW Bush and he was a one-termer.
96 - Bob Dole (1980), lost
00 - Al Gore (1988), lost
08 - John McCain (2000), lost
12 - Mitt Romney (2008), lost
16 - Hillary Clinton (2008), lost
You may want to rethink your snark, champ.
Huh? "Unique?" Because she tried... twice to be President? There ain't nothin' unique about that. Diamond Joe Biden did the same thing, yet no one says the same thing about him, about the whole inevitability thing (and many still would be happy to have him run, even with that). Not to mention the any number of Republican candidates that pretty much make a living off of campaigning for the Presidency every 4 years or so to sell books and stuff, which no one really seems to care about much either way. The only difference is how people treated it and reacted when Clinton did it compared to every other politician who had made multiple bids. Wonder what the difference is, that lead to those different reactions, and how it relates to this piece... Hmm...
if you repeat enough times that this piece is saying something different from what it obviously is, it doesn't magically become true
I'm well aware of the campaigns from 92-on. It's still hilarious that the big punchline to this piece is Sanders running for president (gasp) again when it's exactly what Clinton did
some of us were politically aware in the 90s and we have very good reasons to not want another Clinton in the WH. It's easier to cover yourself with accusations of sexism though, so go for it
Yes, exactly what Clinton did and failed at. But Bernie will succeed because he's got some vestige of a penis.
jesus you people are thick
But if you expand it at all before that before that, it looks a lot different. Reagan tried to primary Ford, but then won (two terms). Nixon lost to Kennedy, and then later won (two terms).
The last time a primary retread candidate won was George HW Bush and he was a one-termer.
96 - Bob Dole (1980), lost
00 - Al Gore (1988), lost
08 - John McCain (2000), lost
12 - Mitt Romney (2008), lost
16 - Hillary Clinton (2008), lost
You may want to rethink your snark, champ.
Was that meant to diminish my amusement? It's really not a difficult piece to understand.
but that headline alone made me want to slap the author silly, joke or not.
It's only ever worked on the GOP side.But if you expand it at all before that before that, it looks a lot different. Reagan tried to primary Ford, but then won (two terms). Nixon lost to Kennedy, and then later won (two terms).
jesus you people are thick
Arguing for Sanders to run again is learning the exact wrong lesson from what Clinton did.I'm well aware of the campaigns from 92-on. It's still hilarious that the big punchline to this piece is Sanders running for president (gasp) again when it's exactly what Clinton did
If she rallies donors around a new, more progressive, better candidate, is that nothing constructive she can offer?
I agree, it's really not
Arguing for Sanders to run again is learning the exact wrong lesson from what Clinton did.
Arguing for Sanders to run again is learning the exact wrong lesson from what Clinton did.
"You people?" When you were politically aware in the 90s did you follow Ross Perot, by chance?
Arguing for Sanders to run again is learning the exact wrong lesson from what Clinton did.
One can support Clinton when the choice was between her and Sanders while still wishing she had bowed out of the process beforehand.I thought she was the most qualified candidate last election?
Satire is supposed to be funny, right? If so, this article is one of the worst failures of 2017 already and we're only halfway through.
I continue to be baffled by the constant defending of Hillary after she blew the most winnable election in American history. Did people ever defend Al Gore and John Kerry like this?
I continue to be baffled by the constant defending of Hillary after she blew the most winnable election in American history. Did people ever defend Al Gore and John Kerry like this?
because she and her staff ran a terrible campaign that lost to a sexist, race bating, lying pig by failing to take him seriously as a challenger
I continue to be baffled by the constant defending of Hillary after she blew the most winnable election in American history. Did people ever defend Al Gore and John Kerry like this?
Satire is supposed to be funny, right? If so, this article is one of the worst failures of 2017 already and we're only halfway through.
I continue to be baffled by the constant defending of Hillary after she blew the most winnable election in American history. Did people ever defend Al Gore and John Kerry like this?
The GOP is having quite a bit of infighting right now as well!You already know the answer to that question. It's truly fascinating; on the GOP side, you didn't see anything like this for Bush I, Dole, McCain, or Romney, either.
Yes, clearly I was referring to race when I used that expression. You should probably contact my employer.
One can support Clinton when the choice was between her and Sanders while still wishing she had bowed out of the process beforehand.
People still refuse to blame the white people that elected this man into office.
We know that's the name of the game though. Why did Clinton lose all of those counties that previously went to Obama? Genuine question.
Retread candidates go very poorly for Dems. There's an anti-authoritarian/establishment element to the party (and also to a lesser degree in the overall electorate) that really doesn't like being "told what to do."Yes. I think she was the most qualified out of the other candidates. But I also meant just as a citizen - who was more qualified than her?
But I guess I'm just not sure what the lesson we were supposed to learn from the last election was - especially if we exclude Bernie. That probably reflects poorly on me.
Uh, the whole point of that satirical piece is to show the double standards, because Al Gore and John Kerry (and McCain and others who lost the presidency) have never been vilified to the extent that Clinton has, and no one vociferously demanded they leave public life for good, unlike Clinton.Satire is supposed to be funny, right? If so, this article is one of the worst failures of 2017 already and we're only halfway through.
I continue to be baffled by the constant defending of Hillary after she blew the most winnable election in American history. Did people ever defend Al Gore and John Kerry like this?