Also pertaining to your most recent reply too:
You read "I think we should not talk about video games and we should talk about the quake because it is more important."
I read "Square's priorities at the moment are centered on the current disaster at hand and are currently more important than the upkeep of their servers during a time when electricity conservation is encouraged."
Your reading into what you want to hear I'm thinking, probably because of threads people shit up in the past. Your view on his post is not objective, it's subjective, and you shouldn't pass on assumptions of what he meant as facts because frankly you don't know he meant because he didn't elaborate on it, and my interpretation of what he meant is as feasible as yours so there is no merit to "he meant to say we can't discuss" being the objective truth. Unless lupinko trolled in previous threads.
Never pointed fingers, just laid out what i thought was acceptable grounds for discussion. Doesn't stop people from slinging insults around as I can see here. Never been to any of said threads, so don't classify me under "you guys" off the basis of assumptions, please and thank you.
Yeah I'm still not seeing this bit where he "basically" yet explicity said you guys weren't allowed to talk about the implications on gamers. I still think you guys are paraphrasing by providing your own context, see my examples of what I read above.