• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jeb Bush releases 250k+ emails, doesn't redact correspondents' personal info

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NYCmetsfan

Banned
Florida governor Jeb Bush bills himself as a tech-savvy politician, but he just made a major email etiquette mistake: Bush has published over 250,000 emails people sent to him as governor, easily searchable by date— and he hasn't redacted email addresses or the content of messages, meaning anyone who reached out to the governor now has their messages completely out in the open.

It takes seconds to find emails complaining about the Florida voting system following the fraught 2000 presidential election results to New Year's greetings from 2005.

"In the spirit of transparency, I am posting the emails of my governorship here. Some are funny; some are serious; some I wrote in frustration. But they're all here so you can read them and make up your own mind," Bush's site reads.
Click to expand...

Not mentioned: Whether Bush considered how the people who wrote to him felt about using their correspondences in a bid to appear transparent.

In many of the messages, people left their full names and personal information, and their email addresses are plainly available.

While some of these emails are from other political players, many are from ordinary Floridians who wrote to the governor with the intention of communicating with their elected official through email, not through a published public correspondence.

One of the emails, which contains the full name and email address of a person who wrote in to Bush fourteen years ago, explicitly asks the then-governor not to publish his long, personal email:

And please do not make this email public to anybody. I do not want my privacy violated, especially by the media.
Awkward!

The Daily Dot talked to one woman whose AOL address is revealed in the emails. She said she'd never been asked for permission to publish the emails, and is embarrassed by how she comes across:

"I am fine with it on the emails concerning homeowners insurance," the woman added. Ones about "illegal immigrants," however, embarrassed her. "My feelings have changed on that subject and I wold hate to unduly upset anyone," she said.
Bush clearly does not get the internet like he says he does. This decision highlights a lack of understanding about reasonable expectations of privacy online. Yes, these people were emailing a public figure. But they did not expect these emails to be released in such a public way. And while there's no law forbidding politicians from publishing their emails, it would've been easy to redact email addresses and full names and still keep the intention behind the project intact.

But it's too late for take-backs: Even if Bush recognizes that this is a breach in trust, the emails are available to download in their original Outlook format, so he won't be able to take back all of the personal information he just released about his constituents.

Transparency is in short supply in politics. This publication could've been a refreshing instance of a politician proactively sharing information with the public. But while the governor is a public figure, most of his constituents are not. Media organizations, including the New York Times, already had access to these emails thanks to public records requests. But they didn't go ahead and publish the identifying info of people who sent the emails, with good reason: That's a dick move.
Click to expand...

http://gizmodo.com/jeb-bush-basically-just-doxxed-thousands-of-floridians-1684920622

The Verve has found SNN

http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/10/8013531/jeb-bush-
ssn1.0.PNG


edit: screwed up the title, it should be ssn
 
In some weird alternate reality Jeb win's the presidency and he ends up dox'ing all the info for the foreign dignitaries and officials he has to deal with.
 
The most fascinating thing is that many people must have been involved in this (his staff, website guys, etc.) and apparently nobody thought that this is a bad idea.
 
Eh.. The documents are already available as public record, correct? I know media outlets have obtained them.

That said, making them so easily searchable on a web portal without redaction isn't the best of ideas.
 
Is it a "dox" to release an email address with a name associated? Should we have an expectation of privacy with regard to email addresses?
 
Dhx said:
Eh.. The documents are already available as public record, correct? I know media outlets have obtained them.

That said, making them so easily searchable on a web portal without redaction isn't the best of ideas.
Click to expand...

Yes but you have to request them. There is no requirement to randomly dump without redactions. I'm also not sure if you are supposed to redact. I'm asking a friend who deals with this stuff in Florida.

Brakke said:
Is it a "dox" to release an email address with a name associated? Should we have an expectation of privacy with regard to email addresses?
Click to expand...

Personal info is contained within. And revealing personal email is used to dox people on the internet all the time (people have personal emails they don't advertise)
 
APKmetsfan said:
I'm also not sure if you are supposed to redact. I'm asking a friend who deals with this stuff in Florida.
Click to expand...

Depends on if you have any data classification policies in place, and even in those cases I don't believe there's any requirements unless there is other compliance in place like HIPAA/PCI. None of that would apply to emails sent to the governor's inbox however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Personal Bullshite [sic]
2
54
398
Powerhouse replied
The New York Times doesn't know what NATO stands for
29
778
Aesius replied
Kagurabachi Anime Releases April 2027
News 
5
253
thefool replied
  • Locked
New Epstein Emails: Elon Musk Repeatedly Asked To Visit Epstein Island
39 40 41 42 43
2K
8K
Baemono replied
House of the Dragon Season 3 releases July 21 2026
News 
37
811
Hari Seldon replied
Top Bottom