• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jennifer Lawrence: Why do I make less than my male co-stars?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bishop89

Member
I don't understand this attempt at an analogy. Like any other job, you compare them on the basis of the qualifications a person has that suit them for a job. Movie stars earn their living by getting people to pay money to see a movie they're in.
Exactly, and since she has less pull than let's say, the rock, she should get paid less.

I mean let's be honest, that's the only reason they get paid those insane salaries in the first place
 

Dice//

Banned
This isn't really a case of equal pay for equal work though, is it? It's not equal work in the sense of a CEO, teacher, or a sports coach. It's impossible for Lawrence to play the same characters as Robert Downey Jr.

Part of this sort of thing makes me sad.
I might be taking away from what you actually meant... but this sucks, women are often sidelined to supporting roles when honestly we see ourselves (or would like to) as the stars of our own lives in some ways and it's a small reality when media won't reflect that and even worse when you realize it in many ways reflects societal traditions/perspectives of women.

Meryl Streep spoke extremely well on this; certainly one way to help the disparity is to create better/more roles for females in general than supporting.

“A lot of it has to do with imagination and this act of empathy women go through from the time we’re little girls,” the Oscar winner said. “We read all of literature, you know? All of history. It’s really about boys, most of it. But I can feel more like Peter Pan than Wendy or Tinkerbell. I wanted to be Tom Sawyer, not Becky.”

According to the Oscar winner, it’s difficult for her as an actress to have a story “men in the audience feel like they know what I feel.” She added that studios are aware of how “hard” it is for men to put themselves in the shoes of a female protagonist.

A recent study from the Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film at San Diego State University found that only 12 percent of protagonists were women. Ironically, some of the biggest box office numbers of the year came from The Hunger Games’ heroine, Katniss, along with Gone Girl and Maleficent.

“We’re so used to the act of empathizing with the protagonist of a male-driven plot,” Streep said. “That’s what we’ve done all our lives.”
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/04/2...ntertainment-i-wanted-be-tom-sawyer-not-becky
 

KHarvey16

Member
Exactly, and since she has less pull than let's say, the rock, she should get paid less.

I mean let's be honest, that's the only reason they get paid those insane salaries in the first place

The Rock? What does he have to do with this? I don't understand. Do you think she's arguing she should be paid the same as every other male actor?

Her argument isn't about money, her argument just uses money as a symptom of an underlying issue.
 

Dice//

Banned
to be honest I don't feel bad for her even a little bit.... go sit back in your million dollar house with your servants and relax. There are real people out their struggling to pay bills and keep their family afloat.

sigh. Right above you:
Her argument isn't about money, her argument just uses money as a symptom of an underlying issue.
 

KHarvey16

Member
to be honest I don't feel bad for her even a little bit.... go sit back in your million dollar house with your servants and relax. There are real people out there struggling to pay bills and keep their family afloat.

You couldn't be bothered to read the letter, huh?
 

legend166

Member
Part of this sort of thing makes me sad.
I might be taking away from what you actually meant... but this sucks, women are often sidelined to supporting roles when honestly we see ourselves (or would like to) as the stars of our own lives in some ways and it's a small reality when media won't reflect that and even worse when you realize it in many ways reflects societal traditions/perspectives of women.

Meryl Streep spoke extremely well on this; certainly one way to help the disparity is to create better/more roles for females in general than supporting.


http://www.ew.com/article/2015/04/2...ntertainment-i-wanted-be-tom-sawyer-not-becky

Sure - I completely agree with you. This has more to do with the type of roles that women are given.

It's like as if women were only allowed to be nurses and not doctors. Of course they won't get paid as much. The problem is they aren't allowed to be doctors, not that nurses don't get paid as much as doctors.
 
to be honest I don't feel bad for her even a little bit.... go sit back in your million dollar house with your servants and relax. There are real people out there struggling to pay bills and keep their family afloat.

You go back there are sit on your computer, using your internet and relax. There are real people out there struggling to afford food.
 
exactly always someone worse off and that's why I get up every day happy and appreciate everything that I have in my life knowing I came from nothing.

? so you never complain about any injustices ever cuz there's always someone worse off?

...


edit: damn u kharvey16
 

Vamp

Member
I dont know if i am correct but arent men actors less paid than women in porn industry?

She is paid more than tom cruise and jacky chan and they are much better actors than her.
 

KHarvey16

Member
nope. not everyone is the same. I wouldn't complain about something in my personal life if I couldn't do anything about it.... why waste the breath. I think we all (being on a gaming forum) have said something like this company should do this. That's one thing but something that affects me personally like my career or something no. You either find a better situation or you be quiet and enjoy the one you are in.

Yeah, she can go be a movie actress somewhere else!
 
That's one thing but something that affects me personally like my career or something no. You either find a better situation or you be quiet and enjoy the one you are in.

Discussing a problem with others is the first step in finding a better situation. You'd silence people at the very first step of them seeking an answer. Surely you see how stupid your advice is?
 
nope. not everyone is the same. I wouldn't complain about something in my personal life if I couldn't do anything about it.... why waste the breath. I think we all (being on a gaming forum) have said something like this company should do this. That's one thing but something that affects me personally like my career or something no. You either find a better situation or you be quiet and enjoy the one you are in.

???? so you think it's only worthwhile to complain about gaming companies but when the injustices comes down to your career or something then it's ...... not worth wasting breath over?

it ... it cant possibly be that simple to you is it? 'find a better situation' or 'accept shitty condition'. is life that binary? cuz sometimes it's not that easy to 'find a better situation' for some people. like say, if you are born a woman, it's not that easy to 'find a better situation' with regards to income inequality.
 

Corpekata

Banned
Lawrence got paid more than people like Cruise in 2015 because she was in two major franchise movies, while Cruise was in one. She's not getting paid more per role.

And of course she should be making more than Jackie Chan, dude's barely been in movies much the past few years and it's likely most of his earnings are for endorsements.
 

KHarvey16

Member
YEs discuss something if you know there can be change. But most times why waste your time when you know things are not going to change. especially a situation like a career one where someone has control over you (in a way). If I had a boss that wasn't paying me enough or whatever my issue could be (which this has happen to me personally more than once). I know who I am and what I am capable of as far as career wise. Every time I felt the need to I went out and made a better situation for myself. Now if I feel someone is willing to listen and make a change then great. But most of the time that is not the case when you look at the world and business things are changing whether we like it or not. Most of that change is not for the better. we can go on and on. Every person has their philosophy in life, how they choose to live and make their decisions. I was not trying to offend anyone but yes this is the way I choose to live my life. I know that is "stupid" to some. hopefully there is room for differences of opinion.

"When the going gets tough, quit."
- Tron#1
 
YEs discuss something if you know there can be change. But most times why waste your time when you know things are not going to change. especially a situation like a career one where someone has control over you (in a way). If I had a boss that wasn't paying me enough or whatever my issue could be (which this has happen to me personally more than once). I know who I am and what I am capable of as far as career wise. Every time I felt the need to I went out and made a better situation for myself. Now if I feel someone is willing to listen and make a change then great. But most of the time that is not the case when you look at the world and business things are changing whether we like it or not. Most of that change is not for the better. we can go on and on. Every person has their philosophy in life, how they choose to live and make their decisions. I was not trying to offend anyone but yes this is the way I choose to live my life. I know that is "stupid" to some. hopefully there is room for differences of opinion.

well i dont think it's stupid :>

and i do think jennifer is contributing to the change she wishes to see in the world. so i think your first statement telling her to just go sit in her million dollar house and relax is actually running counter to ... uh your creed, so to speak. because just by speaking up, she's making it easier for other women to also speak up on the same issue. and that's a good change.
 

Keri

Member
The letter is a very good read and this thread is more informative than some posters may have intended.

Spot on. So many of the posts in this thread reflect exactly the reaction that inspires women, so frequently, to settle for less than they're worth, just to avoid rocking the boat.
 

labx

Banned
Why is it wrong for her to compare her millions? Why is it not the same for women in different economic classes? As I stated before, patriarchy and misogyny are nearly universal. So why can't you extrapolate the lack of respect she's being shown to the whole of women? You're not explaining that. You're just complaining about her being rich and saying it's a problem.

I agree that there are other issues, but that doesn't lessen this one. The problem is that you're acting like this isn't something even worth arguing or bringing up, and instead distracting the conversation to other topics.

I'm not complaining about her being rich. Good for her. My complain is about using her paycheck to make a statement in a world where the welt is poorly distributed. She is smart, she can complain (as I wrote before) with other topics regarding her profession. And again, you make assumptions with out facts. Where do I sayed that this is not a topic worth arguing? And I'm not distracting anything I have the right of bringing my reality to the mix.
 

pants

Member
Has anyone in this thread figured out why Jackie Chan even made money in 2015?

Also I noticed this with Scarlett Johansson especially, she's always seemed to me to be a higher quality actress than many other making blockbusters but she always seemed to get peanuts in comparison. Would be interested to see what Charlize Theron makes.
 

linsivvi

Member
The fund can be kept separately and used for that and similar purposes, it doesn't have to be used to pay top execs either(The execs should also see a pay cut.).

In fact I would like to see properties be brought even and in full knowledge that they're going to be brought(done) at a loss.

ART should not be BOUND by whether it will generate profit or not. That's one of the problems with capitalism, not only will it tend to concentrate wealth in a few, but it will also tend not to provide for high quality arts and science if there's no foreseen profit.

That sounds like what the dictator of a communist country would say..

Has anyone in this thread figured out why Jackie Chan even made money in 2015?

Yes? The list is not limited to Hollywood. Amitabh Bachchan is on it too and surely he didn't make that kind of money from American movies.
 
I'm not complaining about her being rich. Good for her. My complain is about using her paycheck to make a statement in a world where the welt is poorly distributed. She is smart, she can complain (as I wrote before) with other topics regarding her profession. And again, you make assumptions with out facts. Where do I sayed that this is not a topic worth arguing? And I'm not distracting anything I have the right of bringing my reality to the mix.

Stop making it about the money. It's not about the money. Using her paycheck was just a simple illustration to expose an underlying problem. From the very beginning you've been trying to discredit her because she's discussing her salary, when that's really not what it's about.
 

pants

Member
Yes? The list is not limited to Hollywood. Amitabh Bachchan is on it too and surely he didn't make that kind of money from American movies.
He has one acting credit and two producer credits for 2015, none of the films look they made money either. Here I was hoping there was a slew of 2015 Jackie Chan movies I was yet to discover :(
 

Corpekata

Banned
He has one acting credit and two producer credits for 2015, none of the films look they made money either. Here I was hoping there was a slew of 2015 Jackie Chan movies I was yet to discover :(

The article talks about it. They suggest Dragon Blade, which was a hit in China and its' associated merchandise, as well as an endorsement with a theater chain he has.
 

labx

Banned
Stop making it about the money. It's not about the money. Using her paycheck was just a simple illustration to expose an underlying problem. From the very beginning you've been trying to discredit her because she's discussing her salary, when that's really not what it's about.
You know something guy? You are absolutely 100% right. Your argumentation is flawless 0% biased. I better stop posting.

But I wonder if it is not about the money (for her) and is about the patriarchy and misogynistic world that doesn't give the same chances to women, why she is so focused on the money? Just a question.

She is an active leading actress with a superb résumé for her age with ton of colleagues struggling for a half decent role wishing they have a ¼ of her luck, talent and status. I hope that she with her celebrity status can and will help her colleagues and make a stand on the gender inequality issue.
 

Usobuko

Banned
I don't get people issue with how much Jackie Chan is earning. Putting aside his daredevil antics in his youth, an international star like Jackie Chan would cash in on the vibrant and fast growing entertainment scene in his homeland, China. This is a year where Chan would dethrone the previous holder of top earnings for an actor/actress , Fan Bingbing. And she's a woman.
 
You know something guy? You are absolutely 100% right. Your argumentation is flawless 0% biased. I better stop posting.

But I wonder if it is not about the money (for her) and is about the patriarchy and misogynistic world that doesn't give the same chances to women, why she is so focused on the money? Just a question.

She is an active leading actress with a superb résumé for her age with ton of colleagues struggling for a half decent role wishing they have a ¼ of her luck, talent and status. I hope that she with her celebrity status can and will help her colleagues and make a stand on the gender inequality issue.

First of all, I'm not a guy. Thank you for flawlessly demonstrating your own patriarchal biases and flagrant misunderstanding.

Second of all, she isn't so focused on the money. It's about negotiation tactics, gender discrimination and social conditioning. Salary just happens to be one of the manifestations of those elements that's easy to quantify.

If you were earnestly interested in helping this issue, you wouldn't keep downplaying her message.
 
That sounds like what the dictator of a communist country would say..
The problem with dictactorships and communism is not that they're dictatorships or communism, it is corruption. That can easily be solved by simply having an incorruptible system and leadership.

Many have said that a benevolent monarchy is the best form of government. A large portion of the population is devoted to a supreme benevolent being they believe oversees their universe. The manifestation of true divine authority would indeed prove beneficial, and I believe many would embrace it.
 

spekkeh

Banned
I think it's fair that Cooper and Bale got paid more, seeing as they were the leads (and no less hot commodities than Jlaw), and also the lengths Bale went for the role. Renner got out weirdly lucky, but then Jlaw got overpaid on X-men, so that evens itself out a little. Some of the male actors someone mentioned like Chan and Diesel are also producers--that's how you make the real money. I don't think there are that many female actor-producers (if any at all). And that might tie into the negotiation skills, I think she's probably quite right there. I also experienced this myself, or at least with my wife. She got offered a job and didn't know what to ask for, maybe one scale higher (salary comes in scales here) than they had offered? So she asked a male coworker and he said naw, at least four scales higher. Which she asked and promptly got. That's a lot of money over the years. (I asked two scales higher during my salary negotiations and they said lol no, here's a worse deal than before. So it's not that men are categorically better at it fml.)
 
I think it's fair that Cooper and Bale got paid more, seeing as they were the leads (and no less hot commodities than Jlaw), and also the lengths Bale went for the role. Renner got out weirdly lucky, but then Jlaw got overpaid on X-men, so that evens itself out a little. Some of the male actors someone mentioned like Chan and Diesel are also producers--that's how you make the real money. I don't think there are that many female actor-producers (if any at all). And that might tie into the negotiation skills, I think she's probably quite right there. I also experienced this myself, or at least with my wife. She got offered a job and didn't know what to ask for, maybe one scale higher (salary comes in scales here) than they had offered? So she asked a male coworker and he said naw, at least four scales higher. Which she asked and promptly got. That's a lot of money over the years. (I asked two scales higher during my salary negotiations and they said lol no, here's a worse deal than before. So it's not that men are categorically better at it fml.)

The Bold... that's not how this works.. that's not how any of this works.
 

Ovek

7Member7
She should lead a female actors strike, good luck to Hollywood trying to make any films then.
 

xJavonta

Banned
So why the rant? It's not like it's some secret that just got out in the open, negotiate for what you feel you are worth, not getting it? then pass on the project, you have more than enough money to balk at an offer or two.

If other women in Hollywood feel slanted, they need to speak together to fix the issue, not just go on a random one off to a co-worker.

That calculator line is really strange too...


I loves ya J Law, but you is weird sometimes.
The whole point is society has conditioned women to feel that negotiating for more or what they feel they're worth makes them look like brats or divas and that they shouldn't want to be seen as unlikeable.

Also, the calculator line is a joke. Pretty obvious.
 

Mr_Moogle

Member
Meh, Jennifer Lawrence should be happy with her 52 million. That's ridiculous considering the price/performance ratio. It's like paying heaps of money for a dyson vaccum cleaner when you can go down to your local pawn shop and get a $25 second hand vacuum that will do the same thing.
 
yes its the gender for sure,
no way its got anything to do with your agent, your work, talent or crowd pull.
tom cruise also earns less than her because he's less of a man than she is.
 
For the first bold, I wasn't saying that's how it works. For the second.. Why not?

The majority of actors who get Producer credits aren't Producers in the standard way. Sometimes it can be more of a title than anything else, sometimes it's negotiated in lieu of extra pay, and sometimes (like in the case of television) it's a title that you get due to working there for awhile. I haven't done the research into it but I wouldn't at all be surprised to see the core cast of Fast and Furious getting some kind of producer credit at this point, as an example. But say if Vin is getting a Producer credit on F&F that's different than his Producer credit on Riddick.

Either way though.. plenty of Actresses get producer credit on projects and plenty of actresses actively and passively produce TV shows and movies.
 

spekkeh

Banned
She can't act for shit for one
She has no shame though, complaining about her salary

Meh, Jennifer Lawrence should be happy with her 52 million. That's ridiculous considering the price/performance ratio. It's like paying heaps of money for a dyson vaccum cleaner when you can go down to your local pawn shop and get a $25 second hand vacuum that will do the same thing.
I don't think she's genuinely complaining, and if she really got over 20 million for her role in DoFP there's also nothing wrong with her negotiation skills. I think she's just trying to be a role model here. Thousands of little girls follow her every move, and she's probably just trying to tell them it's good to negotiate and don't feel like you're not supposed to. Men don't, so neither should you. And I think that's a good message to send out.
 
yes its the gender for sure,
no way its got anything to do with your agent, your work, talent or crowd pull.
tom cruise also earns less than her because he's less of a man than she is.
It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive. You can see a similar disparity in more regular jobs as well. Women tend to negotiate their salary less, and people just want to talk about it, and perhaps get to the bottom of why this is a thing. I assume the reasons may be similar to why assertiveness in women is often seen as "bossy" or "bitchy". It creates a dynamic where gals are dissuaded to try to get theirs.
 

DocSeuss

Member
I feel like some of the people complaining about millionaires are missing the point. I'm literally getting up in 4 hours to go beg the government to give me a little bit of grocery money since I've got about $32 to live on until my pay shows up, and yet I can totally empathize and understand the issue here. Don't see why this isn't so hard: it's "am I at a disadvantage because of who I am?" And... y'know, that's a topic worth discussing. Millions don't really enter into it.

Basically the questions to be asked are:
Does Jeremy renner start out at the same price point in negotiating?
Does Jeremy renner have to fight as hard for his paycheck?
Does Jeremy renner feel as much pressure to just accept an amount and avoid a fight?
Does Jeremy renner have to watch his tone while negotiating?


Sure the overall result is that renner and his agent had more success negotiating than Lawrence or Adams but he more than likely had an easier path to that level of pay than they had

And that isn't limited to those specific individual or Hollywood in general.

I feel like the real question is why didn't you capitalize 'Renner."

All joking aside, I agree. Most things I've heard indicate that Hollywood doesn't really treat women as well, but women don't tend to negotiate for it either. Lawrence's own take on this and her resolution is pretty cool, though. She seems smart and level-headed.
 

Fusebox

Banned
She's the biggest star in one of the biggest franchises, her pay should eclipse her male simp costars from day 1, she shouldn't have to fight for it.

She can't act for shit for one
She has no shame though, complaining about her salary

Classy post bro, really nailed the essence of the letter.
 

Ruddles72

Member
yes its the gender for sure,
no way its got anything to do with your agent, your work, talent or crowd pull.
tom cruise also earns less than her because he's less of a man than she is

There are times when I feel like the feminist movement might be too militant. Then I see an out-of-hand dismissive post like this, and I think no, the feminist movement absolutely has every right to be militant because otherwise it's far too easy for people like you to wave them away and dismiss them.

Plus, y'know, if people want to talk about crowd pull....
Ghost Protocol ($694,713,380)
Catching Fire ($864,912,963)
You can use any pairing of Hunger Games vs Mission Impossible films you like.

Jennifer Lawrence demonstrably has more crowd pull than the majority of male stars. Certainly vastly more than someone like Renner. So in a hard-headed, purely commercial sense, J.Law should be able to negotiate a better cut than most male stars, and based on the Sony leaks, she hasn't. Commercially speaking, she is getting ripped off.
 
She's the biggest star in one of the biggest franchises, her pay should eclipse her male simp costars from day 1, she shouldn't have to fight for it.



Classy post bro, really nailed the essence of the letter.
She makes more than most top hollywood actors/actresses and makes more with one movie than 95% of the world population will ever make in their lifetime, so excuse me if I find her complaints a bit crappy.
 

daniels

Member
I dont get it if you are not ok with it dont do the job??
She accepted less and stop negotiating... i mean accepting a deal you are not ok with, selling yourself for less, stopping negotiating and taking the money but later complaining to the world how you got less when you actually yourself stopped negotiation and accepted it instead of saying NO makes me not really care about her problem at all.
No reason to accept something you are not ok with... well i guess the couple of millions she gets was still enough reason to not hold herself up to her own standard.
 

Corpekata

Banned
Whether she can act or not isn't really relevant as much as can she fill seats. I mean Vin Diesel and Adam Sandler are in the top earners after all. And she can. She was, for instance, heavily featured in the promotion for American Hustle despite a small amount of screen time not just by random chance, but because, gasp, the marketing team thought she was marketable.
 

Fusebox

Banned
I dont get it if you are not ok with it dont do the job??
She accepted less and stop negotiating... i mean accepting a deal you are not ok with, selling yourself for less, stopping negotiating and taking the money but later complaining to the world how you got less when you actually yourself stopped negotiation and accepted it instead of saying NO makes me not really care about her problem at all.
No reason to accept something you are not ok with... well i guess the couple of millions she gets was still enough reason to not hold herself up to her own standard.

She already implied she was happy with her pay, just disappointed at the gender disparity which was only revealed after the Sony hack.
 

linsivvi

Member
He has one acting credit and two producer credits for 2015, none of the films look they made money either. Here I was hoping there was a slew of 2015 Jackie Chan movies I was yet to discover :(

$120 million is definitely not "none of the films look they made money".

You should not see the movie though. By all indications it's crap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom