CarpeDeezNutz
Member
I can't think of many celebrities who would have sounded better during that interview.
That awful womon should be fired.
You would take his side...
Jim was a jerk but that woman spouting off all those buzz words lol.
I can't think of many celebrities who would have sounded better during that interview.
That awful womon should be fired.
You would take his side...
Just give the man a damn script
He says that he's not against vaccinating, just some of the chemicals found in vaccines.
All anti-vaccinationists believe they are not anti-vaccinationists the same way all racists believe they are not racists.
"some chemicals" is just a dog-whistle they use. They can never scientifically explain what the problem is with 'the chemicals', and the chemical in question changes on a yearly basis.
Ace Ventura 3?
Yeah, Jim Carrey got weird.
I thought it was weird and funny.
But then again I personally think life is indeed inherently meaningless and free will mostly an illusion.
I do like that suit though.
Man this stuff just bums me out. I miss MTV awards Jim Carrey. He was awesome. :-/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xon9iUDtIA0
It is never justifiable to act like a dick
When did Jim Carrey become an internet troll
he was literally being an edge lord
DMT will fuck you up, kids.
I think he was offended, his response seemed defensive. But he lately seems depressed, not that I know him personally but it's concerning as a huge fan of his. I'm not sure if he can find what he's looking for.
Fine, whether he was right or wrong, I think it's important to realize that he had good intentions. I feel so bad for him.
Its Tom Ford
You know that people die, many of whom are very small children and infants, because of his "good intentions" that are based on nonsense. He and his "just asking questions" can get fucked.
this is ludicrously untrueIt is never justifiable to act like a dick
this is ludicrously untrue
also if someone has it coming.If you are literally a penis is one example.
I do like that suit though.
Well, he's kinda right you know. Needs less mumbo jumbo and more historical materialist analysis. But -- concerning the basic gist - he's right. (EDIT: ... in my historical materialist opinion ...)