You guys laugh but this fits perfectly with all the independant graphic design magazines (and posters, and books, etc) I see nowadays.
This is a site where tons of people are making fun of Geocities, yet they use a Geocities-like dark theme while the light theme "hurts their eyes," and they had pretty much every logo rebranding ever. I don't trust the Gaf design sense, as a community.
in like '08 there was ameme where we'd photoshop posts on top of a pedestal
lets just pretend we did that here
This is a site where tons of people are making fun of Geocities, yet they use a Geocities-like dark theme while the light theme "hurts their eyes," and they had pretty much every logo rebranding ever.
I've never read someone describe more explicitly their lack of familiarity with GeoCities.
You really areMaybe I'm misremembering dark themes on sites
i'm really really enjoying the site. the various pieces are interesting and the site itself is quite engaging. it's almost designed like a phone app with the way navigation is handled. they also produced a really good video (imo):
Our review of the Vigilante iphone app: no
This is a site where tons of people are making fun of Geocities, yet they use a Geocities-like dark theme while the light theme "hurts their eyes," and they hate pretty much every logo rebranding ever. I don't trust the Gaf design sense, as a community.
i'm really really enjoying the site. the various pieces are interesting and the site itself is quite engaging. it's almost designed like a phone app with the way navigation is handled. they also produced a really good video (imo):
Our review of the Vigilante iphone app: no
Some of the links just lead to like a tiny nugget of information, which is strange. LikeI clicked on something from the election, and it just takes me to a picture of Clinton and it says she is currently winning the popular vote my 2.5 million votes. That's literally all it says. Is there a link to an article I'm missing in these situations?
But beyond that, I don't know if we really need another website for unqualified people to write about topics that they're not qualified to write about, and pretend that they speak with authority. We have Vox, Gawker/RIP, and to a lesser degree, Vice, for that already.
i'm really really enjoying the site. the various pieces are interesting and the site itself is quite engaging. it's almost designed like a phone app with the way navigation is handled. they also produced a really good video (imo):
Our review of the Vigilante iphone app: no
Huh?! You only read academic papers? Otherwise practically all journalism is unqualified people writing with authority about topics in which they aren't experts.
So they are making the Buzzfeed of tech?
its small and blends into the color scheme of the infocard but its in the bottom of leftambient said:hat's literally all it says. Is there a link to an article I'm missing in these situations?
Has vaporwave gone too far?
https://theoutline.com/post/546/lunar-observer-dec-11-17There's no great day to cut hair this week. It's best to wait until the 29th.