Shadowlink said:
Even if the attitude era was cheesy, it was more enjoyable than the era we have today. I blame the WWE creative team for making it shit. I agree with those who say that we shouldn't blame it being PG, but we haven't had matches such as TLC, Street Fights in the parking lot. Should we blame the creative writing, or the WWE being PG? I'd blame Vince like usual, but I'm not too sure who decides what matches the wrestlers have.
I've been a longtime wrestling fan, not as much anymore, but I'll tell you exactly why WWE is in the shape it is in right now. It's the complete lack of importance placed on ANYTHING that goes on. Nothing is built properly, so who cares what happens? It's a PG traveling tour. You plunk down your money or turn on the TV, see Cena do his thing, Rey do his thing, and call it a day. That's why I laugh at people getting upset at who 'goes over.' Who gives a shit? Whether this guy or that guy has the belt doesn't change anything, because nothing is important.
I'll break down the 4 reasons what makes wrestling exciting and give an example off the top of my head:
1) Big match feel - Basically irrelevant nowadays, because partially nothing except who Undertaker's Wrestlemania match has a big match feel in WWE anymore. And that's an auto big match feel on the basis of history and little else. 80's era WWF did this great, obviously. You mentioned the Attitude era, hell, it did it fairly great, even though it was a lot of weird matches - the undercard was given a lot of focus - undercard wrestlers has actual REAL plots and feuds. Not anymore. Paul Heyman was a MASTER of this in ECW. Practically every guy on the roster, even after constantly getting the roster depleted, he made seem important in their own way and want to see a match. And even though RVD got hurt and Taz eventually left, he was building to a supermatch between RVD and Taz for a long, long time. And when those guys weren't around, he made two random guys out of nowhere, Mike Awesome and Masato Tanaka, seem like an epic feud. In today's WWE, who gives a shit what happens in any match? None of it has any importance placed on it.
2) Out of ring buildup - This ties into what makes up a big match feel - having the sizzle to go along with the feud. There is no sizzle in any feud in WWE anymore. We get the same tired wash and repeat stuff of weekly shows with someone interfering and costing a match to their opponent and them talking about it. Wow, so entertaining. When's the last time, outside of Punk's recent promo, anything exciting you would remember happened outside of the ring for a building? Basically .. nothing. You can compare this to any era of wrestling that was good, obviously the Attitude era had a ton of out ring stuff, things like Austin throwing the IC title off the bridge, or doing random crap throughout that era, or even WWF era things like the Mega Powers colliding. The had something decent with the start of Nexus last year that quickly fizzled out, and it became nothing more than the typical interference/beatdown dog and pony show buildups now are today. Cena overcomes the odds one week, the next he gets beat up, then the PPV.
3) In ring buildup - Self explanatory, and doesn't happen much in today's WWE - where basically the strength of great matches carry a feud. Not many great wrestlers anymore and not many feuds over recent years I can even recall being an awesome in ring feud where you would want to watch the matches again.
4) Clash of personalities - Another major thing lacking in WWE - the personalities of 90% of the roster are horrible, generic crap - or some gimmick that was once thought funny, then ran into the ground over and over again until its for horribly unfunny attempt at humor segments. Who can really tell between guys like Ziggler, Kofi, Danielson, Bourne, Sheamus, etc? They're all generic personalities no one cares about because they've never been involved in anything interesting, so why should anyone care? It's basically like pre Attitude era WWF in the opposite direction. Instead of outlandish cartoon gimmicks you have generic create a wrestler type personalities. Maybe the biggest thing that separates the Attitude era and old school ECW - where everyone had a distinct personality - and you even rooted or cared about the low level guys of the organization, like the bWo or X-Pac, and stuff like the European title that went along with it.
There's my rant for the day. I listed the 4 things that make wrestling good, and WWE rarely hits on a single one of these in a feud all year long, that's why no one cares, why its boring, and why nothing matters.