• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Jurassic World Official Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
I sort of wish the first part of the movie was like going through the park from the kids perspective. Seeing all the cool dinosaurs, then shit hits the fan, park is evacuated and a team of badass dino hunters are sent in ala the movie Predator.

That kinda seemed like what the third movie was gonna be.

Until, ya know... they all died about five minutes into the movie.
 
The first film isn't cheeseball at all.

It is, but that's not why it's overrated. It's overrated because outside of the spectacle and the Berg's excellent direction, it has a pretty tepid story full of characters that aren't really worth rooting for.

I'm the biggest Spielberg fanboy around and the original JP is one of my least favourite films of his.
 
GlhkYa9.jpg
This is great.
 
That's not quite fair. This isn't a leak. This is a trailer. it should look good

This is how every single CG heavy movie goes. They literally can't finish them that fast, otherwise the movie wouldn't have a year of post production.
The same conversation every time:

"Why does the CG look unfinished?"
"Because it is unfinished"
"Well why put out a trailer with unfinished CG?"
"Because they have to put out a trailer"
"Why not show no CG in the trailer then?"

Because then you get:

jurassicpark25.PNG


"Uh, eventually you do plan to have dinosaurs in your dinosaur movie trailer? Hello?"
 
And you're certain there is zero divide below the water between there and the stands? Or that the dinosaur isn't only let out of an enclosure to do the show?
Judging the entire technical aspect of the movie from literally one trailer shot is silly.

I'm not judging the movie, I'm judging the park as if it's a real thing, cause it's fun to speculate about what can go wrong.

I don't care what kind of divide you have down there, I wouldn't trust it. That thing looks like it could smash through damn near anything. Wouldn't even trust an electrified fence cause we all know how well that went. Always prepare for the worst when dealing with a giant dinosaur that eats sharks for lunch.

Sure it's no fun if you can't share a beach with a carnivore, but I'm just being one of the practical characters from the JP films.

article-2280385-17a93gwurg.jpg


Jesus Christ what a shitty house. Did a four year old build it? it doesn't even have a roof.

It could be worse, instead of a dinosaur park, it could be Nazi Germany.
 
ILM did the CGI on the three SW prequels.

They aren't infallible.

They also got rid of a lot of senior San Francisco engineers about 1-2 years ago.
Including people with years of particle, TD knowledge to get costs down.
Lots of stuff is probably done by their Singapore unit.
Not saying those are not ILM but ILM is not a monolithic "always perfect" VFX house. Sure they have their pipeline for rendering, their libraries for rocket trails, explosions, they have their settings for accurate motion blur etc but you can't automate CG to the point of where anyone can do it. Much to the detriment of cost cutters world wide I would assume.
 
Lastly, the whole premise of the film is...weird. Did they not learn from the first mishap? I guess not.

If the technology already existed with most of the research and development complete, all that was needed was the finances needed to turn said R&D into a multi-billion dollar brand? I promise you someone would have another go at it. It would be a one of a kind product in it's own category of entertainment.

That's like saying that because sometimes we've had space shuttle failures everyone should just want to just quit and not try again.

Also, I bet the Yelp reviews of Jurassic World would be fucking great.
 
See this makes me respect your opinion more. You don't even care much for the original so there's no way in hell you were going to like this. :p

If anything, it should mean I'm the one that's least going to be overhyped. Lowered expectations are a bad thing now? Shit looks bad, man.
 
Part of the reason the 1993 CG looks so good is because it was based on months if not years of stop-motion work before it and the people doing it all were one team (as opposed to having a dozen unconnected VFX houses do the work for the lowest bid)
i9SyFFmXLLcdD.gif

Look at the number of bones in that T-Rex: Less than 30 joints! They knew what they were doing back then. Today a Rigger TD would probably put at least 10x the amount of bones in.

Or you know, it's dark, lowkey light, and it's raining noise.
 
I'm not hyped for this because I don't really get hyped for things anymore. But this looks interesting enough that I'm almost certainly going to spend the $12 it takes to see it
 
article-2280385-17a93gwurg.jpg


Jesus Christ what a shitty house. Did a four year old build it? it doesn't even have a roof.

Keep on defending a multi-million dollar project. If they don't know how to market it (ie NOT SHOW unfinished scenes, just things that are good enough to be shown), it's their fault.
 
I feel this place would be a much nicer place if people would start respecting each others opinions.

Some will like this movie. Some will not.

It will not please everyone.

It's bad enough when someone threatened to kill me for liking TLW.
 
If anything, it should mean I'm the one that's least going to be overhyped. Lowered expectations are a bad thing now? Shit looks bad, man.

You're entitled to that. I'm just saying that if you didn't even care for the original that Spielberg, one of the greatest directors of all time made, the chances of you responding positively to this were going to be slim to none.
 
Keep on defending a multi-million dollar project. If they don't know how to market it (ie NOT SHOW unfinished scenes, just things that are good enough to be shown), it's their fault.

You want them to put out a trailer about a dinosaur movie, and not show any dinosaurs in it?
 
"Gee mom, I really have to go babysit my little brother at a totally wicked dinosaur park? But I was gonna go to a concert with Becky this weekend!"

I'm not a nerd, I'm a *hacker*

No I mean like badasses are sent in. If one can't carry a giant ass chaingun it's not working. Something like the characters from Evolve are sent in. Maybe Chris Pratt is the brains of the operation sort of thing.

This shit should be spoiler tagged:

there is a division of badasses from Ingen I believe, someone correct me if I'm wrong. The crazy guy that shot the sargeant and himself in Full Metal Jacket is supposedly playing some kind of hardened soldier type, possibly even a "bad guy" and there is leaked test footage of a submachine gun firing at a dinosaur moving through the jungle-- so it's very possible you'll get something along those lines
 
It is, but that's not why it's overrated. It's overrated because outside of the spectacle and the Berg's excellent direction, it has a pretty tepid story full of characters that aren't really worth rooting for.

I'm the biggest Spielberg fanboy around and the original JP is one of my least favourite films of his.

Grant, Goldblum, Grant's love interest, female daughter, and Hammond were all fine characters.

The cast was fairly good by and large.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom