BolognaSoup
Member
We got the Dyson Animal 4 years ago when we got our yellow lab. It has been flawless and we've used it a ton. Very easy to maintain/clean too. I would highly recommend it to anyone even if you don't have a pet.
big_z said:consumer reports factors in the price so they often give items that aren't the best higher scores due to bargain price.
Zaraki_Kenpachi said:Pretty much. People are in outrage if CR doesn't recommend anything but 47" Pioneer Plasmas for tvs and $500 headphones for headphones. Most people can live with less and what a reasonable product for their price point.
perryfarrell said:Should have read some Consumer reports or reviews. They're not any better than your average vacuum.
Their fans are even worse rip-offs (300$ for a "bladeless" fan that performs on the same level as a $10 dollar fan...)
geeko420 said:^^^kirby I bet
We have this. We had berber carpet and that can be tough for vacumns.Jill Sandwich said:I've had a Dyson DC18 for some years now and it's been great. Easy to empty, nifty hose in the handle, built-in attachments, its light and most importantly, it sucks!
![]()
Is it really that shocking that a general audience publication doesn't address the concerns of technophiles? Their computer reviews have always glossed over details important to people like me.Ptaaty said:I disagree. Consumer Reports has lost my trust. Not completely but there are just so many other sources that can really go in depth and not just a surface review.
[...]
CR has botched plenty, I used to review home theater equipment and would laugh at CRs flimsy excuse for tests.
Part of it, i'm assuming, is someone who pays $400+ for a vacuum is going to take damn good care of, while they'll probably treat a $100 vacuum like shit.Dynamite Ringo Matsuri said:This. I think a lot of their budget is spent on perpetuating the belief that they engineer superior products (like Bose) when in actuality, vacuums that are half the price are just as good.
Kirby you say?basic_element said:Don't know about Dyson, but my parents have a Kirby for 10 years now. Paid $800 for a re-conditoned one ($1200 new) but well worth the purchase. It also doubles as a carpet shampoo cleaner.
As for myself, I've used cheap ass vacuums that costs me $70-80 but they don't clean nearly as well and after a year or 2, they still work but they become less effective and start smelling more because there are air leaks. I always borrow my parents kirby whenever I want to really clean my carpet.
Those who say it's the same shit never used a quality vacuum before. You might think your cheap ass vacuum is working great but I bet your carpet is dirty as f*ck. :lol
dskillzhtown said:Shit like that is why I don't trust Consumer Reports anymore. I have an aunt who bought a Dyson 8 years ago and is still using it. During that same time I bought 3 vacuums. Each one more expensive than the last. I could have bought 2 Dysons with that money. I finally broke down and bought a Dyson and to say it isn't any better than your average vacuum is some bullshit. Straight up bullshit.
The Dyson cleans much better than any other vacuum I have had. I bought the same model the OP did and the dog hair that thing is pulling up is amazing. My last vacuum didn't come close to picking up this much hair.
So yeah, as far as value and performace, Dyson is worth it. Everything that is expensive isn't a ripoff.
weekend_warrior said:Dyson's are overpriced junk. You'd be surprised by the amount of cheap plastic on a $500 vac,
karobit said:Think about it. Who the five greatest vacuums of all time? Dyson, Dyson, Dyson, Dyson and Dyson. Cause it spits hot fire.
The cost of a product isn't exclusively tied to the costs of the components of the product. It's like suggesting videogames should cost $2 because that's the expense of the packaging.weekend_warrior said:Dyson's are overpriced junk. You'd be surprised by the amount of cheap plastic on a $500 vac,
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:The cost of a product isn't exclusively tied to the costs of the components of the product. It's like suggesting videogames should cost $2 because that's the expense of the packaging.
It costs money to figure out how to make shit, dude. The Dyson vacuum design is pretty unique and it obviously took some time to get it right.
loosus said:Yeah, people almost exclusively say good things about Dyson. The worst you hear is "I like it, but it's not $400 like." But you rarely hear "piece of shit broke within a year, grab a $90 vacuum and be done with it."
duderon said:Does the vacuum have the proper amount of suction?
Tedesco! said:
Oh, Craigy...LOVE IT!mj1108 said:Only those who watch Craig will get this reference.
Also, it's got 1 ball.
Perfect.
When we bought ours only the smallest model had the ball in it. But we got the high end animal one on clearance so we got a bitchin price on it. But yes, best vacuum ever. Pricey, but it works exceptionally.Koodo said:I can understand snobbery in here when it comes to gadgetry, but vacuums? :lol
I'll just say that my mom bought a Dyson (ball model) and it's been the best vacuum we've had so far. The initial expense has been rendered null since it has exceeded every previous product in quality and, most importantly, durability.
Oh, and that ball is my shit. I feel all sorts of fierce when I gracefully turn the vacuum around.
Yeah.Visualante said:We've had 2 in almost 15 years. I dunno maybe they're more affordable in the UK because it's a home brand, the first one we got as an ex-display unit.
I'm sure the competition has caught up somewhat- but they're still the best vacuum cleaners I've ever used. Comparing them to Bose and calling their audience Mac crowd is quite laughable. Practically everyone has one here.
Oh and one needed a spare part because the plastic cracked, it was an easy and affordable replacement we could do ourselves.
http://www.dyson.co.uk/support/help.asp?article=1691&product=DC33-Ifugimax said:How do dysons work with long hair? Our current vacuum just gets hair tangled in it to all hell since my wife has long hair. Everytime I go to vacuum, I have to cut a disgusting amount of hair off the brushes/roller..
That's basically what I saw when I went looking for vacuums last year. I settled on Dyson despite it being significantly more expensive than the second option on my list entirely because I'd never heard something really bad about it.loosus said:Yeah, people almost exclusively say good things about Dyson. The worst you hear is "I like it, but it's not $400 like." But you rarely hear "piece of shit broke within a year, grab a $90 vacuum and be done with it."
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks it looks awesome :lolVipershark said:edit- also I love the "flamethrower" hose :lol
anonnumber6 said:It is worth the price, you could use one for a lifetime.
zoukka said:How the fuck does anyone know this is true?