• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Kaz Hirai: PS3 to be profitable in '08

Draft said:
Price cut would be great. The non-gimped PS3 would be $400 which I could easily justify.

in backwards compatibility + Blu Ray + Dual Shock 3 + reasonable price we trust :bow

Good things come to those who wait.

much enjoyment has come already for those who believed

:X
 
Not to troll but have sales of past Sony funded PS3 games really been the cash cow for them?
I doubt anything other than Resistance and Motorstorm was profitable, but games in stores still make more money than games in development.
 
OldJadedGamer said:
Not to troll but have sales of past Sony funded PS3 games really been the cash cow for them?
MotorStorm & Resistance did quite well with the latter closing in on 3m (including a couple of hundred k bundled from July to Sept in EU).
But 2008 absolutely destroys 07 in any way imaginable.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, the original post is a troll. nothing but an attempt to stir shit up.

Why would the notion of PS3 being profitable 'stir shit up'.

Maybe you need to be less emotionally attached to your off-white piece of plastic.
 
I'm so happy

Genisis%20Balloons-pic1.jpg


Let's hug tj, those fools gonna be cryin with their add ons :lol
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, the original post is a troll. A bald faced lie about what Kaz said = nothing but an attempt to stir shit up.

wait, wut? Even if the OP is a lie, how is it a troll and an attempt to 'stir shit up'. :lol
 
xaosslug said:
wait, wut? Even if the OP is a lie, how is it a troll and an attempt to 'stir shit up'.

Posting the truth of what Kaz said is much more boring and wouldn't get as many responses, depriving the OP of the attention that he so desperately craves.
 
andycapps said:
I believe he was outed because he was too much of a maverick for the corporate sector. He would essentially envision what he wanted to do, and do whatever it took to get there. Which meant that his superiors wouldn't know what he was doing sometimes or that he was working on stuff (or how much they spent on Cell, supposedly) that wasn't approved. That being said, Ken being a maverick like this was, IMO, good for gaming and for consumers, but not good for the corporation. His being a maverick in the first place is how the first Playstation was even made. Regardless, I think the man had a vision (even if it was crazy to us mortals most of the time :lol ) for how things could be and came up with concepts that were frankly too expensive or overreaching for most corporate boards to OK. That is why I believe he was "outed."

On topic, I expect that PS3 would be profitable in 2008, sounds about right. Now if they get 65 nm Cell and RSX in there, they could lower the price $100 by this Christmas and either be losing very little or possibly even generating a slight profit. The slight profit combined with the price drop is very unlikely, IMO.
Well said. Given his druthers, I think KK would have made the PS2 the living room hub he wanted it to be. I wonder if the image of the machine would be different now had he still been in-charge. I really don't like the focus of SCE since his departure. Seems like they're wasting the PS3 with the way they've targeted it. PEACE.
 
How much have they lost on the PS3 so far? I recall a listing of their finances from the PS2 launch onwards, and it was pretty heavily into the negatives. Excluding the PS2 would make those losses dip into the 'staggering' category, and I don't think that even includes the costs of R&D. So how does the PS3 figure to hit profitability, realistically?

Didn't the PS1 R&D not get paid off until the PS2 was out?
 
Pimpwerx said:
Well said. Given his druthers, I think KK would have made the PS2 the living room hub he wanted it to be. I wonder if the image of the machine would be different now had he still been in-charge. I really don't like the focus of SCE since his departure. Seems like they're wasting the PS3 with the way they've targeted it. PEACE.

Well, just to elaborate on what I said earlier, I don't think everything he said or did benefited consumers. He said that consumers would want to work two jobs to get a PS3 and that it was a supercomputer, among other things. We wouldn't have had a price drop if he was still in charge, guaranteed. So that was good for consumers that that decision was taken out of his hands. Kaz Hirai moved in and recognized that a price drop needed to be done to keep the PS3 from completely tanking. Now they're playing catch up. When I said that what he did was good for consumers in that he was giving the consumer a product that was generally beyond what the competitors were doing. They could have gone safe on the PS2 and PS3 and offered up incremental upgrades or cut some things (more things, rather) in the launch units but they didn't. Now we're seeing cuts in the 40 GB unit that would not have been made had Kutaragi been in charge still. No backwards compatibility would have never cut it with him.
 
tjhooker said:
Why would the notion of PS3 being profitable 'stir shit up'.

Maybe you need to be less emotionally attached to your off-white piece of plastic.


Maybe you should be less emotionally attached to your dust attracter *ends reverse tjhooker*

You totally took the statements and made them into something that was not even said. Who is stirring shit up?
 
xaosslug said:
wait, wut? Even if the OP is a lie, how is it a troll and an attempt to 'stir shit up'. :lol

This is will come to be and he will be sporting the big as 20 gallon cowboy hat!
 
OldJadedGamer said:
I think Firewire was referring to the OP in his comment.


Actually no I wasn't! I was referring to the same people who show up in every Sony/PS3/PS3game related thread and start talking shit, (I'm not referring to you) like the guy yesterday trying to convince people certain PS3 games suck, but then admitting he's never played them. Or like in this thread people trying to guess how much money Sony has lost & trying to make their guesses look like fact. Or the last LBP thread were you have 50 people (funny how most of them never showed up in other Sony related threads) saying it won't sell shit, and then admitting they don't know anything about the game.

Its the same bullshit day in day out! A thread can't get passed 2 posts before some idiot attempts to derail it. And I know this is a two way street, the same shit happens in 360 threads I imagine.

As for beermonkey@tehbias post about the OP, I totally agree!

PS: Sorry about the rant, but this shit gets to be annoying!
 
Firewire said:
Actually no I wasn't! I was referring to the same people who show up in every Sony/PS3/PS3game related thread and start talking shit

You need to start naming these same people.
 
PS3 is great but how can you not find the psychotic devotion and delusion displayed by Sony fans this generation to be entertaining. :lol People like Tjhooker went off the deep end when all those crazy predictions they were making didnt materialize. Good stuff.
 
Firewire said:
Or like in this thread people trying to guess how much money Sony has lost & trying to make their guesses look like fact.
If this is a reference to my post, I can guarantee you that I'm not guessing.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Posting the truth of what Kaz said is much more boring and wouldn't get as many responses, depriving the OP of the attention that he so desperately craves.

but that's not trolling OR stirring shit up. Unless you're saying posting positive PS3 news = trolling/stirring shit up on GAF these days. The OP reading into Hirai's comments and extrapolating his own conclusion (which is what I'd say OP did) is more along the lines of reaching.

these be very turbulent times.
 
westical said:
You need to start naming these same people.


Look at the first few of pages of almost any Sony/PS3 related thread. You will see the same names pop up, talking crap! I guess they can't help themselves or something.

I just don't understand it. Most people that frequent this site on a regular basis, pretty well know I don't currently own a 360, but do you see me in 360 related threads talking shit? No! Because I have no business talking about stuff I don't know about or stuff I don't tend to follow.

There are people who I know don't own PS3's, or favor the 360 or Wii, who do frequent Sony/PS3 threads, but they don't talk crap, they bring useful insight into threads, those I don't mind, but the constant bs talkers are fucking annoying!

Anyways I'll stop now, as I don't want to do a meltddown!
 
xaosslug said:
but that's not trolling OR stirring shit up. Unless you're saying posting positive PS3 news = trolling/stirring shit up on GAF these days.

Trolling is posting something controversial in order to bait people into responding. Just the act of lying itself makes a post more controversial, and having it make like Kaz said something silly is more controversial.

If the OP had posted 'Kaz: We hope to be profitable in '08', this thread wouldn't be half the size. Hell, it wouldn't even be postworthy. Of course they hope to be profitable in '08, that's just common sense.

Firewire said:
Most people that frequent this site on a regular basis, pretty well know I don't currently own a 360, but do you see me in 360 related threads talking shit? No! Because I have no business talking about stuff I don't know about or stuff I don't tend to follow.

That's a good practice. I wouldn't be in this thread if I didn't own a PS3.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
That's a good practice. I wouldn't be in this thread if I didn't own a PS3.

Well I know you own a PS3, but I wasn't referring to you in a negative way either, posters like yourself & benjaminberdie and others tend to bring intelligent discussion to threads. Its just some of the others.

Anyways I've managed to do what so many others try to do by derailing this thread.

My Apologies!
 
Firewire said:
Look at the first few of pages of almost any Sony/PS3 related thread. You will see the same names pop up, talking crap! I guess they can't help themselves or something.
It's mostly because said Sony threads tend to be created by a handful of folks who fancy themselves as volunteer Sony PR agents, and they make threads that scream out for ridicule. Like this one.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Trolling is posting something controversial in order to bait people into responding. Just the act of lying itself makes a post more controversial, and having it make like Kaz said something silly is more controversial.

If the OP had posted 'Kaz: We hope to be profitable in '08', this thread wouldn't be half the size. Hell, it wouldn't even be postworthy. Of course they hope to be profitable in '08, that's just common sense.

i see your piont and all, but still. I find no covtroversy in the OP whatsoever. Over-reaching? Sure. But, nothing that should ruffle any feathers. Seriously, are you bothered by the conclusion the OP drew?
 
Firewire said:
Look at the first few of pages of almost any Sony/PS3 related thread. You will see the same names pop up, talking crap! I guess they can't help themselves or something.

I just don't understand it. Most people that frequent this site on a regular basis, pretty well know I don't currently own a 360, but do you see me in 360 related threads talking shit? No! Because I have no business talking about stuff I don't know about or stuff I don't tend to follow.

There are people who I know don't own PS3's, or favor the 360 or Wii, who do frequent Sony/PS3 threads, but they don't talk crap, they bring useful insight into threads, those I don't mind, but the constant bs talkers are fucking annoying!
Agreed. This generation of systems in particular has been really bad. And it's not just here, it's everywhere. I was reading a thread on another forum were the topic was about the PS3 Orange Box suggestion thread. I shit you not, the next 2-3 pages were about a couple of people arguing about achievements in the game. Achievements! This whole thing is getting silly. Every system out there has something for everyone. If the system being discussed is not one you favor, you're entitled to your opinion. But to just constantly crap on a system you don't own just cause... It's getting tired.
 
Firewire said:
Well I know you own a PS3, but I wasn't referring to you in a negative way either, posters like yourself & benjaminberdie and others tend to bring intelligent discussion to threads. Its just some of the others.

Anyways I've managed to do what so many others try to do by derailing this thread.

My Apologies!

Hey, no apologies needed. I agree that there are people on all sides (from stuff like the Blu-Ray victory to Live getting 10 million subs) that try to crap on good news. I just think this specific thread is silly and I'm highly suspect about the original post.

Sony getting PS3 profitable is a good thing for this industry. Nobody should want them to fail.

xaosslug said:
Seriously, are you bothered by the conclusion the OP drew?

It's not just a conclusion, it's a thread where the very title is a lie. Kaz never said that.
 
Firewire said:
Well I know you own a PS3, but I wasn't referring to you in a negative way either, posters like yourself & benjaminberdie and others tend to bring intelligent discussion to threads. Its just some of the others.

Anyways I've managed to do what so many others try to do by derailing this thread.

My Apologies!

Post like yours help to bring the system wars on topics. Just let them troll, like the 360 trolls and the wii ones and a mod will hit them. No need to help them derailing tthe threads.

and :lol at the title in comparation with the reality. I hope they get 50$ off this year, that way it will be the same price as the 360 here and I will finally get one (in time for LBP, fuck yeah!)
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Um, the original post is a troll. A bald faced lie about what Kaz said = nothing but an attempt to stir shit up.
WTF???

:lol Why do any of you care if Sony profits in '08? It's good for us gamers. Why would xbox fans care if Sony profits or not when the 360 hasn't profited? My god
 
InterMoniker said:
WTF???

:lol Why do any of you care if Sony profits in '08? It's good for us gamers. Why would xbox fans care if Sony profits or not when the 360 hasn't profited? My god

Because Xbox fans can also be Sony fans? It's always black and white at GAF.
 
Anth said:
I doubt anything other than Resistance and Motorstorm was profitable, but games in stores still make more money than games in development.
Yeah now think of 10 Sony exclusive all selling that good
MGS4,Killzone 2 Resistance 2 Motorstorm 2 Socom GT5 ect ect ect

tjhooker said:
Give them a break.

They're still trying to figure out what to do with their HD-DVD add-ons :lol
Wow :lol
beerbelly said:
Because Xbox fans can also be Sony fans? It's always black and white at GAF.
So complain about the 360 not being profitable it's in worse shape than the ps3 now.

:lol
 
InterMoniker said:
So complain about the 360 not being profitable it's in worse shape than the ps3 now.

:lol


WTF???

Why do you care if Xbox profits in '08? Why would sony fans care if MS profits or not when the ps3 hasn't profited? My god



see what u did there?
 
everyone in this thread is an economist.

everyone knows the price of components going in the ps3.

everyone

EVERYONE
 
beerbelly said:
WTF???

Why do you care if Xbox profits in '08? Why would sony fans care if MS profits or not when the ps3 hasn't profited? My god



see what u did there?
I don't.

I don't see what u did there.
 
Dos it matter? The other Sony divisions make big commitment to push Blu-ray (meaning pay out $$$ to Warner) I would hope that the gaming division is making money soon.

BTW, I was reading wiki the other day, Sony paid FIVE BILLIONS to get MGM, and then gave huge chunk (international distribution right) to Fox to keep them in the Blu-ray camp. Sony has invested way more in Blu-ray than the gaming division.
 
Top Bottom