aygomyownroad
Member
Microsoft's e3 showed me that I was right to buy one.
The Sony show told me I should buy one in a couple of years
The Sony show told me I should buy one in a couple of years
But then you take a step back and realize FF7 is "First on PS4" with no release date and just a CG trailer, Shenmue 3 is a Kickstarter that won't hit the budget Yu Suzuki really needs to make the game he wants to make and it's scheduled for 2017 (no way it hits this date ), The Last Guardian looks just like it did in the original PS3 trailer (I'm aware the PS3 framerate was altered so it wasn't really looking that good) and has a vague 2016 release date, and UC4 showed an uninspired demo (though the extended portion looked better). That all brings the conference down a few notches for me. Horizon was amazing, though, and Sony could almost win on that alone for many people.
E3 has never been solely about this year's holiday.quite a few people in the press pointed out sony was mostly smoke and mirrors. a lot of the stuff they announced is years away but it made for an exciting show.
It is very akin to the narrative that Sony has no games for PS4 because they dare to spread out their lineup throughout the whole year and not just stack them for holiday only.E3 has never been solely about this year's holiday.
E3 has never been solely about this year's holiday.
MS did show the future, they just chose to show the more immediate future. it seems that they were successful with that attempt judging by the positive reactions to their conference.
No. That would be like saying "We'll find out who won GDC by counting dev kits". Completely unrelated.
I thought it was unanimous but i guess not.
![]()
If ff7 is multiplat why does sony get e3 credit for it?
You mean stuff we already knew was coming out in Fall 2015? MS didn't announce anything new that came out immediately this year.
It's amazing how people constantly move goal posts so as to detract from Sony/PS4 in terms of its gaming line-up relative to the competition when in reality they're doing as well and not front loading their games for one season of the year.
I don't think it matters to an E3 presentation how the things shown might actually turn out when they release.
I'm also very sceptical of Shenmue 3, but that doesn't change the fact that it was a huge announcement. Its was one of the most anticipated announcements of all time.
The fact that Last Guardian looks the same as in 2009 is extremely irrlevant. ICO and SotC are two of the best games of all time and no matter what you favorite game of recent years is, these two are likely to have influenced the creators. Beeing a spiritual two these two is huge, and nobody cares about the visuals here. Besides all that, the game still looks fantastic.
This doesn't change a thing about the significance of this announcement.
UC4 demo uninspired? They actually showed something new: Vast environments, insane destructibility and driving.
Its not not like people didn't freak out about the first part of the demo, it was GAFs second best of E3, even before the extende demo release. And in my opinion the first part was more impressive.
But even if that wasn't for you, compare it to all the other gameplay demo shown, there is no doubt that it was 2 levels above everything else except Horizon, especially compared to TombRaider we have a clear winner.
Also the fact that FF7 is not completely exclusive doesn't matter one bit. FF was always a Playstation franchise and I wouldn't be surprised if SE doesn't even bother with porting it after the timed exclusivity is done.
If you want to pick the conference apart like that, you have to do it for everyone.
Ms:
Tomb Raider is only timed exclusive.
ReCore only CGI.
BC only for selected games.
Gears demo was truly uninspired and boring and didn't even look that impressive, the game is also far off.Halo 5 doesn't have splitscreen and the graphics are unimpressive for sub 1080p and unstable 60FPS.That one I mean for real. Gears and TR demos were really really bad.
Looks like a crappy conference.
Everybody knows who won, which is exactly why the hipster gaming press have to pretend the opposite.
Just surprising that anyone with a slight gaming interest would think Sony didn't win that E3.
When did they announce other platforms outside Ps4?
If ff7 is multiplat why does sony get e3 credit for it?
Well, unless they're being especially cheeky, "First on PlayStation 4" would indicate that there will be a release on a second platform. Possibly more.
Well, unless they're being especially cheeky, "First on PlayStation 4" would indicate that there will be a release on a second platform. Possibly more.
FFVII Remake is SFV scenario according to Kagari. Shenmue 3 is going PC/PS4 only.
Man, listening to it and they're already wrong. Only No Man's Sky and Uncharted Collection for PS4? LOL
I mean I can understand why everyone thinks that way, but I never played any Shenmue game, or finished FFVII or Ico. Something like Rare replay sounds a lot more exciting TBH. I guess because I played all those games on N64. That said, I'm still looking forward to see how TLG and FFVII remake will pan out.
I love Kinda Funny but they've been saying this for months and it really isn't that accurate. I think a lot of it stems from Colin's tendency to dismiss anything and everything that doesn't suit his personal tastes.Man, listening to it and they're already wrong. Only No Man's Sky and Uncharted Collection for PS4? LOL
No, the purpose of E3 is to gain market share for your product. Thats it. Its a marketing exercise of future releases to get people to buy into that ecosystem. Works for hardware and software. Its a marketing extravaganza and is probably measured in such ways (although looser metrics can be used like tweets, forum reactions, attendance etc)
The purpose of GDC is not dev kits...
If your market share increases more than your competitors for the months following E3, that is a success and you actually won...as that is the aim of all 3 console makers and why they do it.
I go to trade shows (not game related) and that is why we go (although the beer is nice).
Yes 50 gamers on a forum or a few journalists may vote one way or another, but their significance is much less than THEY think.
If Sony beat MS hands sown this month on NPD, they will chalk it up to their E3 showings, and visa versa so will MS.
End.
We we find out who actually won when NPD is released this month, it tells you in numbers which presentations had the most impact on the market.
E3 is a contest?
AwesomeI thought it was unanimous but i guess not.
![]()
I thought it was unanimous but i guess not.
![]()
It is very akin to the narrative that Sony has no games for PS4 because they dare to spread out their lineup throughout the whole year and not just stack them for holiday only.
For real. If Sony had held back Bloodborne and Order 1886 for Holiday people would be jizzing themselves. Meanwhile I don't remember any Xbox exclusive at the same period for comparison (because people compare Sony and MS E3 conference)
Was it the company with no major announcements or the company with no releases in 2015? I don't know if it's that clear. But fuck it, these hipster press sneak fucks amirite?
This is what you posted
Are you talking about NPD for the month of June, or are you talking about NPD's for the remainder of the year and beyond?