• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Lawsuit: NYPD killed student, covered it up

Status
Not open for further replies.
Update:

Video confirms police lied

------

Original:

NYPD is at it again...

After Officer Darren Ilardi fatally struck 24-year-old Ryo Oyamada with his police cruiser in Queensbridge last year, the NYPD purposefully destroyed evidence, failed to properly investigate the crash, and engaged in a "cover-up," according to a set of recently filed court documents.

Officers responding to the scene dispersed all eyewitnesses, failed to measure skid marks, and did not check Ilardi's cell phone records to determine if he was using his phone when he struck the 24-year-old student outside a deli near the intersection of 40th Avenue and 10th Street, the filings claim.

The filings contain redactions because law enforcement techniques and personnel files of city employees are usually given protection by the court, but they suggest that the NYPD destroyed video evidence of the crash itself:

Videorecordings made by surveillance cameras near the crash scene recorded four different police vehicles approaching the scene of the crash, but NYPD [REDACTED], making it impossible to identify which of the four different vehicles depicted was Ilardi's. It is impossible to view these snippets of videorecordings [REDACTED] and not wonder why images of the actual crash were omitted.

When Ilardi and his partner were interviewed by the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau shortly after the collision, those officers "set about changing the testimony of the sole remaining known eyewitness to the crash other than Ilardi—Ilardi's partner, Police Officer Carman," the attorney for the Oyamada family, Steve Vaccaro, writes in the filing.

Vaccaro, who declined to comment for this article, then includes a large portion of the IAB transcript that was provided by the City, but that too is redacted.

The NYPD has maintained to The New York Times and other media outlets that Ilardi was responding to a domestic disturbance and had his emergency lights engaged.

But Oyamada's family points to radio transcripts and other evidence provided by the City to show that he was not assigned to the disturbance, he did not tell anyone he was responding to an emergency, and that two other NYPD units had already been assigned to the call, which was later deemed to be unfounded.


The court filings also suggest that Ilardi had a poor driving record, and that the NYPD had failed to retrain or discipline him for it.

"Plaintiff have only received what may be the tip of an iceberg of evidence regarding [REDACTED]," Vaccaro writes in the filing. "It is apparent that at this stage of the litigation, Defendants have far more information regarding [REDACTED] than plaintiff."

That body of evidence may bear similarities to the case of Officer Joseph Gray. In 2001, Gray drunkenly ran over a family in Sunset Park, killing three people and an unborn child. At trial, prosecutors found that the NYPD had failed to properly investigate the crash, turned in blank photographs as evidence, and attempted to give Gray a "benefit" by trying to help him pass a sobriety test.

Wiley Norvell, a spokesman for Mayor de Blasio, said in an email, "We cannot comment on the litigation, but ensuring the rigor of crash investigations is a priority for the administration."

A representative for Councilmember Jimmy Van Bramer, whose district covers the area of the crash, did not respond to a request for comment. [UPDATE // 2:45 PM] In a statement, Councilmember Van Bramer says "This case is a tragedy. We mourn Ryo's death and while we cannot comment on the ongoing litigation, the family deserves transparency and clarity as to the circumstances of this untimely death."

http://gothamist.com/2014/08/04/nypd_kills_coverup.php

It's sad that another "hope and change" politician is in office and has done nothing toc rack down on this kind of illegal abuse. While the initial event didn't happen when Blasio was mayor, he has shown no signs of cracking down on his out of control police department.
 
And just like in the Zimmmerman case, a shitty first investigation will be enough to create reasonable doubt and the killer will walk free.
 
Why are they allowed to work? Why do they hold the title as police if they do nothing but kill as murders? They police or help no one, but are equivalent to gang members with money, power and resources to make anything about them disappear. They are a mafia and nothing will ever be done to combat this. Disgusting.
 
Why are they allowed to work? Why do they hold the title as police if they do nothing but kill as murders? They police or help no one, but are equivalent to gang members with money, power and resources to make anything about them disappear. They are a mafia and nothing will ever be done to combat this. Disgusting.
I sure as hell hope you are specifically talking about the police in this story and not police in general.
 
I sure as hell hope you are specifically talking about the police in this story and not police in general.
Two posts in and all you've done is run to the defense of cops. They don't need you defending them. They're getting away with enough as it is.
 
I sure as hell hope you are specifically talking about the police in this story and not police in general.

Im talking about the NYPD. The rotten police that represent that already dark hell hole organization is not making it any better for anyone to put any faith into them. They lie, cheat, steal, plant, kill, take away illegally, racial profile - i mean what the hell do they do good for anyone that is a minority? Nothing. Living in NYC basically my whole life, this is every day and it will never change.
 
And just like in the Zimmmerman case, a shitty first investigation will be enough to create reasonable doubt and the killer will walk free.

It's interesting how that works, isn't it?
 
Two posts in and all you've done is run to the defense of cops. They don't need you defending them. They're getting away with enough as it is.
My father was a cop for 15 years, one of my best friends is currently a cop, so it's probably understandable that I hate the "fuck all cops" mentality. There are corrup cops, yes, and they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but a hell of a lot more crimes are stopped and solved daily than corrupt cops commiting them. Who catches murders? Who catches thieves? Who catches rapists and molesters? Who removes an abusive husband from a home? People want to take the bad things commited by horrible people and blame everyone with the same occupation for it and that's bullshit. How about we act like adults judge individuals for their horrible actions separate from their occupation? Police officers are human beings and human beings can be good or bad. A corrupt cop that commits a crime and uses his job to cover it up is a criminal that used their occupation to their advantage, that does not make all cops criminals.

The human brain gains the ability to seperate individuals from groups in adolescence, people need to use that ability to separate individuals from "the police". It is a police officer's job to protect and serve and the force as a whole does that, it is individuals that commit crimes. Sometimes it is groups of individuals that commit crimes instead of a single individual, but that still doesn't represent the force as a whole. Cops are people and there is no magic machine to tell if a person is bad or not, that's why cops are constantly reevaluated and why internal affairs exists.
 
Yeah that's all good, your dad and friend are cops. You're completely ignoring why there's a reason why people in the United States seem to have a cold attitude towards cops that exists nowhere else in the world.

There have been mountains and mountains of evidence that corruption and abuse of power is systemic in a lot of police departments around the State. That's the key: its systemic and let's be honest, the people's attitude won't change until people are convinced that it isn't systemic.
 
How about we act like adults judge individuals for their horrible actions separate from their occupation?

Nope, it doesn't work that way for cops. They are held to a higher standard, because they are given guns and authority in return for a promise to protect the rest of us. If they not only don't keep that promise, but use the authority WE gave them to kill US, they deserve the worst they get, and that goes double for their coward fellow-cops that protect them.
 
My father was a cop for 15 years, one of my best friends is currently a cop, so it's probably understandable that I hate the "fuck all cops" mentality. There are corrup cops, yes, and they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but a hell of a lot more crimes are stopped and solved daily than corrupt cops commiting them. Who catches murders? Who catches thieves? Who catches rapists and molesters? Who removes an abusive husband from a home? People want to take the bad things commited by horrible people and blame everyone with the same occupation for it and that's bullshit. How about we act like adults judge individuals for their horrible actions separate from their occupation? Police officers are human beings and human beings can be good or bad. A corrupt cop that commits a crime and uses his job to cover it up is a criminal that used their occupation to their advantage, that does not make all cops criminals.

The human brain gains the ability to seperate individuals from groups in adolescence, people need to use that ability to separate individuals from "the police". It is a police officer's job to protect and serve and the force as a whole does that, it is individuals that commit crimes. Sometimes it is groups of individuals that commit crimes instead of a single individual, but that still doesn't represent the force as a whole. Cops are people and there is no magic machine to tell if a person is bad or not, that's why cops are constantly reevaluated and why internal affairs exists.
No one gives a fuck about your father. Cops are not a protected class of citizen. They're an occupation.
 
You have to ask yourself why it seems that the NYPD breaks the law everyday.

Hint: The media is not the problem here.
New York is a massive city and it has tons of cops spread across 76 precincts with their own command. That's a lot of room for bad eggs. And if there is a greater corruption in the NYPD that still doesn't represent cops in the rest of the country, nor the cops IN NYC who just do their jobs. I also never said the media is the problem, I'm just trying to say how bullshit it is to hate all cops because of horrible individuals.

You're right, the problem is that we pay too much attention to police breaking the law.
Or the problem is horrible people doing horrible things and those horrible people happen to be cops. Not all cops are horrible people.
 
Once again, you're dodging the point. Do you believe police corruption and abuse of power to be systemic or not? If so, then you should know why people refer to the police as a public institution and not as mere individuals who do their own things.
 
Why are they allowed to work? Why do they hold the title as police if they do nothing but kill as murders? They police or help no one, but are equivalent to gang members with money, power and resources to make anything about them disappear. They are a mafia and nothing will ever be done to combat this. Disgusting.

The police force is very necessary because they protect the wealth and property of the corporate state. Without them, the wealthy minority would have no defense against the poor majority.

What's up with the NYPD lately? Seems like every other day there's a huge news story.

They've always been like this. But the internet has resulted in more intense coverage of their malfeasance.
 
The police force is very necessary because they protect the wealth and property of the corporate state. Without them, the wealthy minority would have no defense against the poor majority.


They've always been like this. But the internet has resulted in more intense coverage of their malfeasance.

I believe it. My friend had his wallet stolen by the NYPD when they took him in for smoking marijuana in public. They stole 42 bucks. This is getting ridiculous though with the violence.
 
My father was a cop for 15 years, one of my best friends is currently a cop, so it's probably understandable that I hate the "fuck all cops" mentality. There are corrup cops, yes, and they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but a hell of a lot more crimes are stopped and solved daily than corrupt cops commiting them. Who catches murders? Who catches thieves? Who catches rapists and molesters? Who removes an abusive husband from a home? People want to take the bad things commited by horrible people and blame everyone with the same occupation for it and that's bullshit. How about we act like adults judge individuals for their horrible actions separate from their occupation? Police officers are human beings and human beings can be good or bad. A corrupt cop that commits a crime and uses his job to cover it up is a criminal that used their occupation to their advantage, that does not make all cops criminals.

The human brain gains the ability to seperate individuals from groups in adolescence, people need to use that ability to separate individuals from "the police". It is a police officer's job to protect and serve and the force as a whole does that, it is individuals that commit crimes. Sometimes it is groups of individuals that commit crimes instead of a single individual, but that still doesn't represent the force as a whole. Cops are people and there is no magic machine to tell if a person is bad or not, that's why cops are constantly reevaluated and why internal affairs exists.

Why we got racism and stereotypes doe?!
 
My father was a cop for 15 years, one of my best friends is currently a cop, so it's probably understandable that I hate the "fuck all cops" mentality. There are corrup cops, yes, and they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but a hell of a lot more crimes are stopped and solved daily than corrupt cops commiting them. Who catches murders? Who catches thieves? Who catches rapists and molesters? Who removes an abusive husband from a home? People want to take the bad things commited by horrible people and blame everyone with the same occupation for it and that's bullshit. How about we act like adults judge individuals for their horrible actions separate from their occupation? Police officers are human beings and human beings can be good or bad. A corrupt cop that commits a crime and uses his job to cover it up is a criminal that used their occupation to their advantage, that does not make all cops criminals.

The human brain gains the ability to seperate individuals from groups in adolescence, people need to use that ability to separate individuals from "the police". It is a police officer's job to protect and serve and the force as a whole does that, it is individuals that commit crimes. Sometimes it is groups of individuals that commit crimes instead of a single individual, but that still doesn't represent the force as a whole. Cops are people and there is no magic machine to tell if a person is bad or not, that's why cops are constantly reevaluated and why internal affairs exists.

If any of those "good" cops protect or make excuses for the cops breaking the law, then they are no longer good cops.
 
My uncle and aunt are NYPD and it don't feel the need to defend this shit or the institution for that reason. They wouldn't either.
 
Yeah that's all good, your dad and friend are cops. You're completely ignoring why there's a reason why people in the United States seem to have a cold attitude towards cops that exists nowhere else in the world.

There have been mountains and mountains of evidence that corruption and abuse of power is systemic in a lot of police departments around the State. That's the key: its systemic and let's be honest, the people's attitude won't change until people are convinced that it isn't systemic.
You are generalizing and blaming everyone for the actions of individuals. Crimminals deserve to be punished for the crimes they commit and some of those crimminals are cops and that is because cops are humans and not some higher race of always just and never corrupt angels. Hardworking men and women who do their jobs don't deserve to be hated for the actions of others.

Nope, it doesn't work that way for cops. They are held to a higher standard, because they are given guns and authority in return for a promise to protect the rest of us. If they not only don't keep that promise, but use the authority WE gave them to kill US, they deserve the worst they get, and that goes double for their coward fellow-cops that protect them.
Again we are generalizing and blaming the many for the actions of the few. A cop is a human being and they are no more infallible or perfect than the rest of us and it is foolish to expect them all to be. The hate should be focused at the individuals that commit crimes and their superiors should questioned. A cop on the other side of the country should not be hated for the actions of a person they have never met.
I know that many times their are difficulties with cops being punished properly for their actions and that is a real problem, but isn't the fault of every cop, that's a fault with the system.

No one gives a fuck about your father. Cops are not a protected class of citizen. They're an occupation.
Good job reading and comprehending my post. A+
 
Since the thread has gone a little meta, I will say this. I don't have a problem with posting negative police threads if it is a story that will create interesting debate/conversation on the subject. The problem recently is that there are a collection of users who think they are being edgy, clever, or whatever, by re-uttering constant drive-by posts that are nothing more than variations of "paid vacation", "desk job", "fuck cops", and (when there is no race related context to the story)"well if he was black". These drive by posts can ruin any potential for reasonable debate with these threads.

I actually find this particular story quite interesting with how much it seems the NYPD has seemingly done to cover up the incident. I am actually going to be a little more aware when these threads pop up and see how many originate from the NYPD.

No one gives a fuck about your father. Cops are not a protected class of citizen. They're an occupation.

Aren't you so edgy.
 
My uncle and aunt are NYPD and it don't feel the need to defend this shit or the institution for that reason. They wouldn't either.
And guess what, I'm not defending the actions of the people in this story, in fact I've already said that all involved should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. I'm also not defending the system either. I'm defending individuals who are unfairly hated based on the actions of corrupt cops. Do you feel your aunt and uncle should be hated because of the actions of others?
 
Again we are generalizing and blaming the many for the actions of the few. A cop is a human being and they are no more infallible or perfect than the rest of us and it is foolish to expect them all to be. The hate should be focused at the individuals that commit crimes and their superiors should questioned. A cop on the other side of the country should not be hated for the actions of a person they have never met.
I know that many times their are difficulties with cops being punished properly for their actions and that is a real problem, but isn't the fault of every cop, that's a fault with the system.

Absolutely. I'm sure the vast majority of cops are normal people doing their jobs, and it's not surprising, nor necessarily a reflection on the rest of them, that some of them would turn out to be bad people. The frustration a lot of us feel comes from the fact that those bad ones don't seem to be punished or dealt with.

Stop giving bad cops free passes and cop-hating will go away.
 
Since the thread has gone a little meta, I will say this. I don't have a problem with posting negative police threads if it is a story that will create interesting debate/conversation on the subject. The problem recently is that there are a collection of users who think they are being edgy, clever, or whatever, I re-uttering constant drive-by posts that are nothing more than "paid vacation", "desk job", "fuck cops", and (when there is no race related context to the story)"well if he was black". These drive by posts ruin any potential for reasonable debate with these threads.

I actually find this particular story quite interesting with how much it seems the NYPD has seemingly done to cover up the incident. I am actually going to be a little more aware when these threads pop up and see how many originate from the NYPD.



Aren't you so edgy.
I also have no problem with the posting of negative news stories about cops, in fact it is good that the actions of horrible people are being exposed to tons of people. What I hate is the people who post about how they hate all cops and that the police are just mobsters with a badge.
 
There are corrup cops, yes, and they deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but a hell of a lot more crimes are stopped and solved daily than corrupt cops commiting them. Who catches murders? Who catches thieves? Who catches rapists and molesters? Who removes an abusive husband from a home?

If the perpetrator is a cop? Nobody. As for non-cop criminals; rapists, murders, and thieves are dealt with whether there's a police force or not. If you're dad is a cop, he probably told you that most criminals are caught because of testimony from community members. Unlike Sherlock Holmes tv shows, most crimes are not complex mysteries. And the ones that are don't usually get solved by cops anyway.

Many many civilizations had/have no police force to speak of, but they didn't collapse because they lacked a group of armed men performing stop-and-frisks on young minorities. The argument that humans would be helpless without a police force always rankles me.

It is a police officer's job to protect and serve and the force as a whole does that, it is individuals that commit crimes.

The "few bad apples" argument has to be retired, or we have to come up with a new definition for the word 'few':


Farrar and his small police force have become the poster boys of body-worn cameras...

...the year-long trial period ending in February saw an 88 percent drop in complaints against police and a 60 percent reduction in uses of force by the police. And these steep declines occurred even though the cameras were in use only about half the time.​

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/08/nypd-cameras-rialto-farrar-bloomberg.html


In 2011, New Yorkers were stopped by the police 685,724 times.
605,328 were totally innocent (88 percent).
350,743 were black (53 percent).
223,740 were Latino (34 percent).
61,805 were white (9 percent).
341,581 were aged 14-24 (51 percent).​

http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data


The Los Angeles Police Commission is investigating how half of the recording antennas in the Southeast Division went missing, seemingly as a way to evade new self-monitoring procedures that the Los Angeles Police Department imposed last year.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/lapd-cops-disabling-recorders-cops-either-them/



There were 10,000 abuse complaints filed against the Chicago PD between 2002 and 2004

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/seven-reasons-police-brutality-is-systematic-not-anecdotal/


Criticisms against the entire police force are not generalizations, they are backed by empirical data.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom