• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Leaked Iron Man 2 CC footage

Status
Not open for further replies.
irfan said:
Bourne, MI4? :lol

Spiderman 4 (325M+)
Transformers 3 (325M+)
Pirates 4 (350M+)
Star Trek (275M+)
Bourne 4 (250M+)
MI4 (150M+)
HP: DH1 (300M+)

For 2010, both TS3 and IM2 are looking like the top dogs, I think IM2 will hit 400M+ but TS3 will not, we'll see.

Poster is hot, looking forward to the trailer. Retarded if its attached to Sherlock Holmes.
Just pointing out the films that caught my eye.

As for the Holmes attachment, there's no other late Dec film I see that would be any better. And I'm guessing they couldn't get space before Avatar in time, so they just went with a film in the Christmas release week.

The trailer looks awesome, you won't be disappointed.
 
XiaNaphryz said:
Just pointing out the films that caught my eye.
Oh ok. Just saying those two will 100% not be among the top 5 in '11.

XiaNaphryz said:
As for the Holmes attachment, there's no other late Dec film I see that would be any better. And I'm guessing they couldn't get space before Avatar in time, so they just went with a film in the Christmas release week.

The trailer looks awesome, you won't be disappointed.
Sherlock Holmes doesnt look PG13, the target audience for IM2.
 
aparisi2274 said:
Here is a bigger version of the poster...

4918_1594708762.jpg

9ihcmp.jpg
 
Poster is nice. Here's hoping it accompanies a half decent movie this time, as the original is the most overrated superhero movie in existence.
 
Solo said:
Poster is nice. Here's hoping it accompanies a half decent movie this time, as the original is the most overrated superhero movie in existence.
It's definitely overrated, but it's still the second best Marvel movie that's been made, after X2.

pbones85 said:
Is there a chance this could be the highest grossing film (domestically/worldwide) of 2010?
*ahem*

Inception
 
Dan said:
It's definitely overrated, but it's still the second best Marvel movie that's been made, after X2.

I know you hate all the Spider-Man movies, so I wont even bother to try :D

Dan said:
*ahem*

Inception

Are you serious? This movie could be Nolan's Heaven's Gate.
 
duckroll said:
Inception is to Chris Nolan what King Kong was to Peter Jackson and what Avatar will be to James Cameron. :o
Psh, Nolan's way more talented than either of those guys.
 
Stabby McSter said:
still doesn't give nolan a "pass go" card :P

Id also argue that his talent level is no greater than the two mentioned. He simply has had the fortune to pick better scripts. Give TDK as it was to Cameron or PJ, and you'd get essentially the same film, but with good action (okay, so PJ's version would be 40 minutes too long :lol ).
 
MadraptorMan said:
Is it just me or does War Machine's arm have no joint to bend with? It's like one solid machine gun lookin' thing.

nah, it's the back of the elbow so I think the area where the two plates meet is the joint. Right where the little white arrows are.
 
Solo said:
Id also argue that his talent level is no greater than the two mentioned. He simply has had the talent to write better scripts. Give TDK as it was to Cameron or PJ, and you'd get essentially the same film, but with good action (okay, so PJ's version would be 40 minutes too long :lol ).

Fixed.
 
duckroll said:
Inception is to Chris Nolan what King Kong was to Peter Jackson and what Avatar will be to James Cameron. :o

Nolan is never going to overuse CGI like those two. I'm shocked he went 100% CGI with Two Face, considering the dude helped build a working Batmobile and Batpod just to avoid using CGI :lol The Batman flying through Hong Kong scene was set to be done for real with no CGI until HK told him he couldn't do it!

No Batman 3 for HK!
 
Solo said:
Id also argue that his talent level is no greater than the two mentioned. He simply has had the fortune to pick better scripts. Give TDK as it was to Cameron or PJ, and you'd get essentially the same film, but with good action (okay, so PJ's version would be 40 minutes too long :lol ).
Peter Jackson's version would have been made on a green screen set with countless numbers of crappy and pointless CG-enhanced flybys around Gotham and there would have been no practical vehicles to be had at all. Two-Face would have been a mocapped character played by Andy Serkis. I'm definitely no fan of Jackson's though.

Given TDK's script Cameron would have done an ok job, but I don't think he could ever pull off the likes of Memento, Insomnia and The Prestige.

He simply has had the fortune to pick better scripts.
I'd suggest there's some level of talent in that... especially when all three of the discussed directors are usually one of the writers anyway.
 
Solo said:
Id also argue that his talent level is no greater than the two mentioned. He simply has had the fortune to pick better scripts. Give TDK as it was to Cameron or PJ, and you'd get essentially the same film, but with good action (okay, so PJ's version would be 40 minutes too long :lol ).

I dunno, it takes some unique skill to direct something like Memento. Could Peter Jackson handle it? I don't know if he'd be able to keep the reverse narrative progression as coherent as Nolan managed to. I question that about Cameron, too. The time travel stuff in the Terminator films is fairly muddy.
 
DMczaf said:
Nolan is never going to overuse CGI like those two. I'm shocked he went 100% CGI with Two Face, considering the dude helped build a working Batmobile and Batpod just to avoid using CGI :lol

I'm pretty sure the production design team told him at some point that he would have to choose between spending 10 hours a day to do the make up for Two Face, or actually being able to blow up a hospital.

As he is a wise man, he picked the hospital. :)
 
Also, I would say that neither Cameron nor Jackson possess the subtlety to direct something like The Prestige. It's a very laid back and deceptive thriller, with a masterful ability to misdirect both the audience and the characters within the story itself. Nolan might suck balls at directing straight action (and yes, this might be a problem for Inception, we shall see), but he is a master at controlling how people perceive what they see on screen, by setting up details and little subtleties in every scene.
 
I ain't seein' James Cameron getting an Oscar worthy performance out of Deebo.

He probably woulda had Sigourney Weaver play Maroni.

xrich said:
how would that not be awesome?
I see that movie every night in my dreams, I don't need it on DVD.
 
I liked Terrance Howard in the first one, but Don Cheadle is a better actor. Not sure how the transition will be. I can't wait for War Machine though.
 
jett said:
Neither has any chance at the next Harry Potter movie. :P
Worldwide, sure, but I don't see Deathly Hallows 1 having the same domestic gross potential as IM2 or TS3. However, if DH1 is well-received, I have a feeling that DH2 will completely destroy everything, everywhere in 2011.
 
Dan said:
Sherlock Holmes is officially PG-13.
Right move then. I still think Sherlock Holmes has a much elder audience.

Koodo said:
Worldwide, sure, but I don't see Deathly Hallows 1 having the same domestic gross potential as IM2 or TS3. However, if DH1 is well-received, I have a feeling that DH2 will completely destroy everything, everywhere in 2011.
WW is just not that great of stat IMO, look at Ice Age 3. :lol HP DH1 will not be the top grossing movie next year IMO, which is great.
 
irfan said:
Right move then. I still think Sherlock Holmes has a much elder audience.


WW is just not that great of stat IMO, look at Ice Age 3. :lol HP DH1 will not be the top grossing movie next year IMO, which is great.

are you still talking WW? because i think DH1 definitely will be.
 
Not to knock the wholly obvious WAR MACHINE ZOMG reactions (that I also had on first glance), but this thing makes WM look like the blacksuit/Venom Iron Man instead of the sidekick/replacement. Would have been cool to see the two suits, side by side, giving their best "do not fuck with us" look instead of the standard "shadow" setup.

Although, maybe Rhodey goes rogue in this one or something, I dunno.
 
Solo said:
Id also argue that his talent level is no greater than the two mentioned. He simply has had the fortune to pick better scripts. Give TDK as it was to Cameron or PJ, and you'd get essentially the same film, but with good action (okay, so PJ's version would be 40 minutes too long :lol ).

Nolan's films were all written or co-written by him.
 
Hrm, I got assaulted by the Nolan DF faster than I thought :D

Zeliard said:
I dunno, it takes some unique skill to direct something like Memento. Could Peter Jackson handle it? I don't know if he'd be able to keep the reverse narrative progression as coherent as Nolan managed to. I question that about Cameron, too. The time travel stuff in the Terminator films is fairly muddy.

Fair enough :lol Nolan is definitely a better writer-director than either. But on pure directioral chops, he is no far ahead, and is in some areas lacking (after 2 major action movies, he still cant construct a thrilling action scene to save his life). Thats really all I was saying.

Dan said:
Peter Jackson's version would have been made on a green screen set with countless numbers of crappy and pointless CG-enhanced flybys around Gotham and there would have been no practical vehicles to be had at all. Two-Face would have been a mocapped character played by Andy Serkis. I'm definitely no fan of Jackson's though.

Given TDK's script Cameron would have done an ok job, but I don't think he could ever pull off the likes of Memento, Insomnia and The Prestige.

Fair enough. Im not a big PJ fan myself, which Ive never made a secret, but he does get my respect for at least pulling off LOTR with mostly success.

As for Cameron, yes, he probably lacks the nuance and subtlety for Nolan's smaller films. Hot damn though, a Cameron TDK would have been ridiculously great.

Dan said:
I'd suggest there's some level of talent in that... especially when all three of the discussed directors are usually one of the writers anyway.

No argument there. PJ is not a good writer, and Cameron is a like a less offensive Lucas: great ideas man, bad at getting those onto paper.

Blader5489 said:
Nolan's films were all written or co-written by him.

See above.
 
The poster looks sweet, but to those who don't know War Machine I wonder if they'll think he's the villain / anti-Iron Man. Similar to the black Spider-Man posters. It does remind me of that marketing.

spiderman3.jpg
 
Iron Man was so fucking awesome.

I haven´t seen the leaked trailer, but Iron Man 2 will be fucking awesome as well and you better like it grandpasimpsonshakesfist.gif
 
TheFallen said:
The poster looks sweet, but to those who don't know War Machine I wonder if they'll think he's the villain / anti-Iron Man. Similar to the black Spider-Man posters. It does remind me of that marketing.
5 posts before this one, sir. Whole-heartedly agree.
 
EMBee99 said:
5 posts before this one, sir. Whole-heartedly agree.

the difference i assume is that they are counting on the fans to know the difference, and that the black robot behind iron man isnt an alter ego.
 
TheFallen said:
The poster looks sweet, but to those who don't know War Machine I wonder if they'll think he's the villain / anti-Iron Man. Similar to the black Spider-Man posters. It does remind me of that marketing.

spiderman3.jpg
Please don't remind us how good the marketing for SPM3 was. So much hype, no could believe it when those first reviews came out.:lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom