R
Retro_
Unconfirmed Member
To be expected when you use Rising as your base
Oh well saved me 15 bucks.
Oh well saved me 15 bucks.
I know we all joke about Biogamergirl, but I wonder how much extra traffic she's getting because of all this attention on Gaf?
You're really taking video game journalists' opinion of the combat over people that actually know what they're talking about?
Well, Platinum was bound to make ONE bad game. At the very least, It happened with an IP with a history of bad games instead of their best IPs or new ones like Bayonetta or Wonderful 101.
Don't worry we still love ya Platinum.![]()
The OT's up, lots of impressions in there.game is already out, we need more impressions than IGN because i'm too cheap to spend 15bucks.
The series has been a critical and commercial success, drawing favorable comparisons with the HBO show Game of Thrones and the work of Hayao Miyazaki,[3] and has been praised by reviewers for its production values and for addressing sociopolitical issues such as social unrest and terrorism.
From the Wiki:
How accurate? Never watched an animated show like this.
LOL at the biased ordering of reviews in the OP.
HMMMMMMMM
The OT's up, lots of impressions in there.
It's not super surprising that the review thread is more popular, though.
Combat gets really good on multiple playthroughs with all of the elements unlocked from the beginning.
http://youtu.be/gGO1f9lm57c
So...basically a typical games journalist.stop giving BioGamer Girl clicks
I've known people who met her, and it's my understanding she self-identifies as a blogger, not a critic. Loves nothing more than to make friends/be social/drink and get invited to review events, and reward the publishers with high scores
See: COD Ghosts 10/10, Destiny 9/10, this game, and I know they are currently (or were recently) at the COD AW review event (paid by activision of course). Expect another 9+ from that.
Basically, this game shows a glimpse of what an AAA The Legend of Korra game could be like, but this clearly didn't have anywhere near the budget to deliver a game worthy of the franchise. For $15, I'd say it's definitely worth picking up for fans of the series. For the others, perhaps not so much. Still, there are far worse games to spend your money on.
EDIT: one thing to note is that the PC version, as one might expect, is poorly optimized. There are practically no graphics settings other than the resolution (maxed out at 1920x1080) and the graphics quality (you only get a choice between "Normal" or "Smooth"). Framerate seems to be capped at 60fps.
Reviewers gonna give shit reviews.
I played the game twice in casual and normal. The difficulty is perfect for both. Kids can definitely play casual and beat it.
Perfect length for a $15 game, looks gorgeous, combat is extremely well done. I'd disregard those reviewers because they seriously don't know how to do their job.
Well, I said it when it was announced and I'll say it again - I wish a better developer than Platinum made/was making a Legend of Korra game.
EDIT: one thing to note is that the PC version, as one might expect, is poorly optimized. There are practically no graphics settings other than the resolution (maxed out at 1920x1080) and the graphics quality (you only get a choice between "Normal" or "Smooth"). Framerate seems to be capped at 60fps.
So...basically a typical games journalist.
So what's bad about them?
Oh wow. I also found this weird site here. Gave it 5.5I'm pretty sure the Moviepilot guy never even played the game.
It just reads like he amassed information from all over the place, threw it all together and called it a review.
There is some factually incorrect information in there (such as each bending element being assigned to its own button, which is not a mistake anyone who's actually played the game would make), or the mentioning of "different creatures" to ride, when it's only Naga.
Plus, his is the only review that went up on the 20th (before the embargo), so I'm calling shenanigans.
Edit: Aaaaaaand the BioGamer Girl review says the exact same thing about bending elements being assigned to buttons (which only happens during Naga Running sequences). Wow.
The only really positive reviewers don't seem to have actually played the game :S
Why isn't the Metacritic listed in the title?
I'm pretty sure the Moviepilot guy never even played the game.
It just reads like he amassed information from all over the place, threw it all together and called it a review.
There is some factually incorrect information in there (such as each bending element being assigned to its own button, which is not a mistake anyone who's actually played the game would make), or the mentioning of "different creatures" to ride, when it's only Naga.
Plus, his is the only review that went up on the 20th (before the embargo), so I'm calling shenanigans.
Edit: Aaaaaaand the BioGamer Girl review says the exact same thing about bending elements being assigned to buttons (which only happens during Naga Running sequences). Wow.
The only really positive reviewers don't seem to have actually played the game :S
There was so much potential for Korra when you consider the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a developer like Platinum to work on the combat, but it seems like the Japanese studio's B-team showed up for this project. The game is certainly better than any of the previous efforts to adapt the Avatar universe, but it falls short of expectations. On its own, it's just an average character action game with a bland story that offers little incentive to come back for seconds. You're better off sticking to watching the show.