• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Let us calmly discuss the Monster Hunter 4chan rumor about PS4 and Switch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't believe it wasn't running on something consumer-level until it is out and released on that consumer hardware.

It was already heavily downgraded from that initial render in February 2013.

Besides, there's nothing really crazy going on. One small corridor environment with a few character models on-screen at best.
 
Highly doubtful on all this, specifically because it characterizes Capcom, Nintendo, & Sony as if they are individuals, when they are giant corporations. I highly doubt you would get a bunch of 'panic' if the formula has indeed changed as drastically as this rumor suggests, as the gameplay formula would largely be detached from the series Nintendo fans have enjoyed on their portables. As for Sony wanting the game to be closer to launch till announce - every Capcom game in last 2 years or so has been announced within 12 or < of its release, so this doesn't sound like its a move made by Sony, rather its a publishing choice being made by Capcom.

And if the game is headed to other platforms like PC & Xbox, then it puts all the 'speculative' part of this leak into even larger question, because why would this strain the relationship between Capcom & Sony, as well as bringing up the question as to why would Sony be paying for an Xbox game to be made, when its clear from the gameplay changes being made that this is supposedly being made for a larger, western-oriented audience. If this is missing Switch, I think its more a technical limitation from Capcom chasing the X1/PS4 specs more than anything. Its amazing that Sony would pay to specifically keep a game as big as MH off switch, when a MH game is being made for Switch regardless, when Sony did not do this with DQ11, another game in a similar situation to this supposed MH follow-up.

The characterization of this leak as Sony bullying Nintendo, Capcom being confused/desperate, & Nintendo being a 'victim', just screams of a Nintendo fan who is trying to rationalize the rumors that another main-entry MH game is coming & missing the Switch. Why would Sony want to save consoles in JP with MH, a game that has been viewed as a portable Nintendo title for the better part of a decade. Not just that, Sony isn't really hard pressed to save consoles in JP - it has the best selling console on the market WW, and it has cultivated a wide audience that is allowing JP devs to find success with their releases in foreign markets, which is something most recently observed with the release of Nier: Automata & Persona 5, among others.

The point is that when it comes to monster Hunter Nintendo is the only legit competitor.


Nintendo has the dominant handheld so existing fans would see a switch version as the superior version.


Sony wants both existing fans as well as the potential expanded audience.
 
Well I think monster spawns would occur when quests were accepted. Like I imagine you could have "wild" occurrences of many default monster favorites (Rathalos, Rathian, Khezu, etc etc), then lock the rare versions behind quests.

Youre probably right. I might be overthinking it too much,
Its just hard to imagine the series doing anything different. I actually think the mission based stuff is perfect as is and shouldnt be changed but I guess Ill see. I just really like the ideas behind it....with you being a hunter and having to register your hunts and turn them in after completion. It feels right to me.

Out of all this stuff, the words "streamlining" and "combat changes" scare me the most as I think thats the stuff that makes Monster Hunter different from its clones. But I guess it really depends on how far they take it.
 
i've seen the 1st post, the 2nd and 3rd is actually new to me
MH going sony console rumours has been floating since ps3 years though so you'd be dumb to still believe this shit
wtzgU.gif
 
If Capcom go full open world with MH5, I wouldn't mind getting mounts. If you capture a Great Jaggi or Velocidrome or even a Gammoth or Rathalos, you can eventually train it to be a mount instead of turning it into mats.
 
Youre probably right. I might be overthinking it too much,
Its just hard to imagine the series doing anything different. I actually think the mission based stuff is perfect as is and shouldnt be changed but I guess Ill see. I just really like the ideas behind it....with you being a hunter and having to register your hunts and turn them in after completion. It feels right to me.

Out of all this stuff, the words "streamlining" and "combat changes" scare me the most as I think thats the stuff that makes Monster Hunter different from its clones. But I guess it really depends on how far they take it.

Yeah the combat changes are a bit of a concern as I like the general weight and feel of the games now. But streamlining could be absolutely wonderful for this series, open world opens up a ton of possibility.

Dynamic weather, day and night cycles, traversal, etc, could all make for a more fascinating, coherent world. The monsters have always been interesting to me in MH, but the world they live in is usually generic background noise. A living, breathing world could be wonderful.
 
Was this already posted here?

&#12459;&#12503;&#12467;&#12531;&#24195;&#22577;&#12373;&#12435;&#12392;&#12398;&#20250;&#35441;&#12290;&#12300;&#20307;&#39443;&#29256;&#12391;&#12414;&#12377;&#12363;&#65311;&#12301;&#12300;&#35443;&#32048;&#12399;&#26126;&#26085;&#12391;&#12301;&#12300;&#20170;&#26399;&#20104;&#23450;&#12398;&#26410;&#30330;&#34920;&#22823;&#22411;&#12479;&#12452;&#12488;&#12523;&#12399;&#12371;&#12428;&#12391;&#12399;&#12394;&#12356;&#12391;&#12377;&#12424;&#12397;&#65311;&#12301;&#12300;&#12399;&#12356;&#12289;&#12473;&#12452;&#12483;&#12481;&#29256;&#12514;&#12531;&#12495;&#12531;&#12480;&#12502;&#12523;&#12463;&#12525;&#12473;&#12392;&#12399;&#21029;&#12391;&#12377;&#12290;&#12301;
https://twitter.com/mochi_wsj/status/867923099655614464

Its a conversation between capcom PR and WSJ reporter.
It basically says that their unannounced AAA title wasn't the Switch version of Monster Hunter XX.
So maybe its a PS4 version MH? or something else.
 
Youre probably right. I might be overthinking it too much,
Its just hard to imagine the series doing anything different. I actually think the mission based stuff is perfect as is and shouldnt be changed but I guess Ill see. I just really like the ideas behind it....with you being a hunter and having to register your hunts and turn them in after completion. It feels right to me.

Out of all this stuff, the words "streamlining" and "combat changes" scare me the most as I think thats the stuff that makes Monster Hunter different from its clones. But I guess it really depends on how far they take it.

Agree and its a concern of mine as well. Change the graphics and add new skills, weapons are good but changing too much on how the game loop goes it'll not be the game we used to know.
 
Either way only PS only players who want actual MH lose, also Sony.
 
I would love for them to do something fresh with Monster Hunter since they're going to keep the old formula on handhelds anyway. I would get to play two styles of a franchise I enjoy. Also, "streamlining" isn't necessarily a bad thing (Bloodborne is a great example).
 
If anything about MH5 having QTEs, an open world, no gathering/quest preperation and all that is true then it's just not Monster Hunter anymore.

Just because of that I don't believe this one bit. It would alienate the fanbase.
I only ever knew that greentext with the red background (which was vague af to begin with), but all the ones with the blue background read like utter and stupid nonsense to me, simply because this would be the polar opposite of what Monster Hunter actually is for the most part.

I tend to believe that if anything MH5 related is to happen on PS4 it will also come to Switch.

This is not a situation like SF5. Street Fighter was never a platform exclusive. SF2 came out (in various versions) on SNES and Genesis (and many more platforms), SF3 came out on Dreamcast and PS2, SF4 came out on PS3, 360, PC and 3DS. It has always been a multi-platform title.
Omitting this series from one potential platform wasn't going to lose Capcom many sales. It's more like the game itself lost Capcom sales, because it felt half-baked when it came out and now it's apparently too late to salvage anything (unless I missed some kind of sales spike in the last few months).

The mainline Monster Hunter series has been exclusive to Nintendo systems since Tri.
This means that the fanbase is currently almost exclusively on 3DS and will most definitely shift over to Switch, thanks to its ability to play MHXX both at home and on the go.
Sony swooping in and buying exclusivity rights to MH5 (for PS4 even) makes no sense. They would have to get all those people, who play MH on 3DS, get over to PS4. There is no safe way to determine how many of those people have a PS4 or are willing to buy a PS4 just for MH5.

This would be too great a financial risk for both Capcom and Sony, in my opinion.
 
I would love for them to do something fresh with Monster Hunter since they're going to keep the old formula on handhelds anyway. I would get to play two styles of a franchise I enjoy. Also, "streamlining" isn't necessarily a bad thing (Bloodborne is a great example).
Bloodborne is more of a modified combat system than a streamlined combat system
 
Open world could be super cool but they better not fucking touch that combat or I'm out. Some of the best combat in a game period

To be honest, I'd take something where you still had hub villages but open mission areas with no loading screens or strict "zones". Basically the way FFXII and other RPGs strike a balance between linear and open world. It could work if the mission areas were large enough.

Because the next numbered Monster Hunter on Switch would have the potential to make the Switch sell like hotcakes, even more than it's selling now. This is probably a move by Sony of Japan which is still more concerned about the Japanese market than international. With handhelds already massively more popular in Japan than consoles, as Monster Hunter being a huge system seller there, MH5 on Switch, and the Switch doubling as a living room console, would mean serious competition for the PS4 in Japan.

Lol some of these posts are incredible. This just reads like fanboy fantasy. Sony has not threatened Nintendo due to a fear that Monster Hunter on the Switch would completely eradicate their relevancy in Japan.
 
It's hard for anyone to get upset about this. For fans of the portable series you still get a new traditional entry and for the first time in a long time a genuine graphical update. For fans who want a more western orientated MH game focused more on graphics we get that too.

I do wonder how this works out for capcom. They go from never really upgrading on graphics for the franchise to suddenly having a huge jump on 2 platforms and making 2 seperate games as well. It seems like they'll be spending a lot more money and I'm doubtful they would recoup that investment. I feel like Sony would have to be giving a lot of incentive to make this a reality.
 
I have played 500hours of Mh1 on Ps2 and was really addicted to the game. Then I got my Ps3 with oblivion and when I saw the huge world the first thing I thought was, how cool a MH in a big and open world and the coop etc. could be. And I still want something like that. And I honestly think a game like Horizon is not so far away from the basic idea.
 
Yeah but Sony has been really western focused this gen right? Why would they care when they already dominate gaming as it is. Doesn't make sense to me.

"Sony" is not a single person. It's not hard to imagine there might be some at Sony Japan that aren't particularly happy with becoming irrelevant; this decision might come from them.

The PS4 is selling badly enough in Japan as is even without "serious competition" from a Switch with MH,

That's kind of an argument in favor of not putting themselves in a worse situation. :D You don't get very far in any kind of business by throwing your hands in the air and saying "that's it, we're done, pack it up" every time you're in a bad place.

and it's incapable of supporting the biggest reason for MH's popularity in Japan (local co-op),

Again, more reason to be afraid of a Switch version; nobody would buy a PS4 one. Whereas a XBone or PC version wouldn't pose any thread.

so even if you ignore the parts about MH5 being heavily Westernized

Even assuming that part of the rumor is true, "westernized" can mean a lot of things. Japanese tastes themselves have become more "westernized" as a consequence of the AAA scene shifting heavily to the west.

or Sony not paying for full exclusivity or Switch still getting the more JP-relevant MH entries,

The next numbered MH entry is always going to be the most relevant in any market. Many of the potential MHXX customers have already played either that version or X on the 3DS; a completely new MH is more attractive.

it's hard to see how Sony would stand to gain enough from this to justify the moneyhat.

Depends on many factors, including how much Sony is moneyhatting and how big the total budged is for the game itself.

This is all assuming the rumor / leak is true, which I'm not convinced at all. I'm just saying it does makes sense for Sony to block a Switch version and only a Switch version.
 
The problem is that it means MH5 gets farmed to a different team while the original team continues on MHP. The last time that happened we got Monster Hunter Freedom.

I know. Imagine a MH for PS4 that the West doesn't care about and Japan dislikes since it's not the "real" team working on it. That's why this deal could be so bad for Capcom in the end.

I still hope the PS4 MH would be cool, though. I don't really care who works on it, as long as it's fun.
 
If anything about MH5 having QTEs, an open world, no gathering/quest preperation and all that is true then it's just not Monster Hunter anymore.

Just because of that I don't believe this one bit. It would alienate the fanbase.
I only ever knew that greentext with the red background (which was vague af to begin with), but all the ones with the blue background read like utter and stupid nonsense to me, simply because this would be the polar opposite of what Monster Hunter actually is for the most part.

QTEs are dumb, if you get pinned or you start riding there is a small QTE/button mash event and that is fine. Open world would be awful because A) The monster will chase you or B) The monster will run away from you and that means you'll spend hours just trying to keep up with it.

I hate farming in mon-hun. I do it because the game requires it but honestly, it's just an unnecessary hurdle along with pointless busywork. Just have all items available for purchase and lock their sale behind hunter ranks. Zenny is already rare due to upgrade costs so why not focus on the other currency type? the points or whatever you collect. Better yet have monster parts have an immediate use, don't just get dash extracts- just get dash juices, don't get pale extracts, just get demon drugs.

There's so much garbage in inventory boxes, so much useless crap you collect, low rank stuff is just mind numbingly useless aside from the 1 or 2 decorations you need.

In fact you collect literal garbage. Garbage. 99x garbage.

You don't need this, eschew all of it. Just hunt monsters.
 
That's kind of an argument in favor of not putting themselves in a worse situation. :D You don't get very far in any kind of business by throwing your hands in the air and saying "that's it, we're done, pack it up" every time you're in a bad place.

Yep, that's why Sony never spun off its TV division or sold off the VAIO PC division or abandoned the Vita worldwide becoming the Wii U of handhelds.

Oh wait.
 
Again, more reason to be afraid of a Switch version; nobody would buy a PS4 one. Whereas a XBone or PC version wouldn't pose any thread.
"thread"? (Sic!) What are you talking about? You mean threat? If so, threat to WHOM? Threat to console Warriors that the game would come to other platforms they dont own as well?
 
The next numbered MH entry is always going to be the most relevant in any market. Many of the potential MHXX customers have already played either that version or X on the 3DS; a completely new MH is more attractive.

I think you missed the part about Switch not just getting MHXX, but continuing to get the traditional mainline MH under a different name. MHP3rd far outsold MHTri, because the former could offer local multiplayer and the latter couldn't.
 
An open world Monster Hunter is the logical evolution for the franchise that is long overdue. And it would be great to see a monhun game with modern graphics after 10+ years of PS2-textures ... PS4-exclusive MonHun in Decima Engine, pls. But seriously don't gimp the combat engine :(
 
If Capcom go full open world with MH5, I wouldn't mind getting mounts. If you capture a Great Jaggi or Velocidrome or even a Gammoth or Rathalos, you can eventually train it to be a mount instead of turning it into mats.


Yup
As in MH stories
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom