UnemployedVillain
Member
You know that GIF is from gameplay right? It was playable at TGS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENzoACpSm6g
Where's the game then?
You know that GIF is from gameplay right? It was playable at TGS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENzoACpSm6g
Why not give those MH clones on PS4 a try?
Where's the game then?
Uncharted and Halo got massive upgrades throughout the years though. Uncharted 4 doesn't look like UC1 and Halo 5 doesn't look like an OG Xbox game.Why? It sells still millions and people love it. Its like saying Uncharted or Halo are in desperate need of an upgrade.
You know that GIF is from gameplay right? It was playable at TGS.
Uncharted and Halo got massive upgrades throughout the years though. Uncharted 4 doesn't look like UC1 and Halo 5 doesn't look like an OG Xbox game.
"Sony is desperate for Japan" but "combat has been changed to be more accessible to the west".
Sure.
Don't believe it wasn't running on something consumer-level until it is out and released on that consumer hardware.
Highly doubtful on all this, specifically because it characterizes Capcom, Nintendo, & Sony as if they are individuals, when they are giant corporations. I highly doubt you would get a bunch of 'panic' if the formula has indeed changed as drastically as this rumor suggests, as the gameplay formula would largely be detached from the series Nintendo fans have enjoyed on their portables. As for Sony wanting the game to be closer to launch till announce - every Capcom game in last 2 years or so has been announced within 12 or < of its release, so this doesn't sound like its a move made by Sony, rather its a publishing choice being made by Capcom.
And if the game is headed to other platforms like PC & Xbox, then it puts all the 'speculative' part of this leak into even larger question, because why would this strain the relationship between Capcom & Sony, as well as bringing up the question as to why would Sony be paying for an Xbox game to be made, when its clear from the gameplay changes being made that this is supposedly being made for a larger, western-oriented audience. If this is missing Switch, I think its more a technical limitation from Capcom chasing the X1/PS4 specs more than anything. Its amazing that Sony would pay to specifically keep a game as big as MH off switch, when a MH game is being made for Switch regardless, when Sony did not do this with DQ11, another game in a similar situation to this supposed MH follow-up.
The characterization of this leak as Sony bullying Nintendo, Capcom being confused/desperate, & Nintendo being a 'victim', just screams of a Nintendo fan who is trying to rationalize the rumors that another main-entry MH game is coming & missing the Switch. Why would Sony want to save consoles in JP with MH, a game that has been viewed as a portable Nintendo title for the better part of a decade. Not just that, Sony isn't really hard pressed to save consoles in JP - it has the best selling console on the market WW, and it has cultivated a wide audience that is allowing JP devs to find success with their releases in foreign markets, which is something most recently observed with the release of Nier: Automata & Persona 5, among others.
Well I think monster spawns would occur when quests were accepted. Like I imagine you could have "wild" occurrences of many default monster favorites (Rathalos, Rathian, Khezu, etc etc), then lock the rare versions behind quests.
Youre probably right. I might be overthinking it too much,
Its just hard to imagine the series doing anything different. I actually think the mission based stuff is perfect as is and shouldnt be changed but I guess Ill see. I just really like the ideas behind it....with you being a hunter and having to register your hunts and turn them in after completion. It feels right to me.
Out of all this stuff, the words "streamlining" and "combat changes" scare me the most as I think thats the stuff that makes Monster Hunter different from its clones. But I guess it really depends on how far they take it.
https://twitter.com/mochi_wsj/status/867923099655614464カプコン広報さんとの会話。「体験版でますか?」「詳細は明日で」「今期予定の未発表大型タイトルはこれではないですよね?」「はい、スイッチ版モンハンダブルクロスとは別です。」
Youre probably right. I might be overthinking it too much,
Its just hard to imagine the series doing anything different. I actually think the mission based stuff is perfect as is and shouldnt be changed but I guess Ill see. I just really like the ideas behind it....with you being a hunter and having to register your hunts and turn them in after completion. It feels right to me.
Out of all this stuff, the words "streamlining" and "combat changes" scare me the most as I think thats the stuff that makes Monster Hunter different from its clones. But I guess it really depends on how far they take it.
Was this already posted here?
https://twitter.com/mochi_wsj/status/867923099655614464
Its a conversation between capcom PR and WSJ reporter.
It basically says that their unannounced AAA title wasn't the Switch version of Monster Hunter XX.
So maybe its a PS4 version MH? or something else.
Thats MH StoriesIf Capcom go full open world with MH5, I wouldn't mind getting mounts. If you capture a Great Jaggi or Velocidrome or even a Gammoth or Rathalos, you can eventually train it to be a mount instead of turning it into mats.
it'll also have a hard time selling two million in Japan thoughI'm praying for dmc 5
it'll also have a hard time selling two million in Japan though
Don't believe it wasn't running on something consumer-level until it is out and released on that consumer hardware.
but it have a higher chance of selling two million than DMC5 lolPS4 MH will not reach that numbers either.
I'm praying for dmc 5
it'll also have a hard time selling two million in Japan though
ah............. westernized monster hunter for ps4 thenThe prediction is 1.5 million. And I think it's a worldwide prediction.
ah............. westernized monster hunter for ps4 then![]()
Bloodborne is more of a modified combat system than a streamlined combat systemI would love for them to do something fresh with Monster Hunter since they're going to keep the old formula on handhelds anyway. I would get to play two styles of a franchise I enjoy. Also, "streamlining" isn't necessarily a bad thing (Bloodborne is a great example).
Open world could be super cool but they better not fucking touch that combat or I'm out. Some of the best combat in a game period
Because the next numbered Monster Hunter on Switch would have the potential to make the Switch sell like hotcakes, even more than it's selling now. This is probably a move by Sony of Japan which is still more concerned about the Japanese market than international. With handhelds already massively more popular in Japan than consoles, as Monster Hunter being a huge system seller there, MH5 on Switch, and the Switch doubling as a living room console, would mean serious competition for the PS4 in Japan.
Yeah but Sony has been really western focused this gen right? Why would they care when they already dominate gaming as it is. Doesn't make sense to me.
The PS4 is selling badly enough in Japan as is even without "serious competition" from a Switch with MH,
and it's incapable of supporting the biggest reason for MH's popularity in Japan (local co-op),
so even if you ignore the parts about MH5 being heavily Westernized
or Sony not paying for full exclusivity or Switch still getting the more JP-relevant MH entries,
it's hard to see how Sony would stand to gain enough from this to justify the moneyhat.
The problem is that it means MH5 gets farmed to a different team while the original team continues on MHP. The last time that happened we got Monster Hunter Freedom.
If anything about MH5 having QTEs, an open world, no gathering/quest preperation and all that is true then it's just not Monster Hunter anymore.
Just because of that I don't believe this one bit. It would alienate the fanbase.
I only ever knew that greentext with the red background (which was vague af to begin with), but all the ones with the blue background read like utter and stupid nonsense to me, simply because this would be the polar opposite of what Monster Hunter actually is for the most part.
That's kind of an argument in favor of not putting themselves in a worse situation.You don't get very far in any kind of business by throwing your hands in the air and saying "that's it, we're done, pack it up" every time you're in a bad place.
"thread"? (Sic!) What are you talking about? You mean threat? If so, threat to WHOM? Threat to console Warriors that the game would come to other platforms they dont own as well?Again, more reason to be afraid of a Switch version; nobody would buy a PS4 one. Whereas a XBone or PC version wouldn't pose any thread.
The next numbered MH entry is always going to be the most relevant in any market. Many of the potential MHXX customers have already played either that version or X on the 3DS; a completely new MH is more attractive.
If Capcom go full open world with MH5, I wouldn't mind getting mounts. If you capture a Great Jaggi or Velocidrome or even a Gammoth or Rathalos, you can eventually train it to be a mount instead of turning it into mats.
Yup
As in MH stories