married zone and divorced zone are some next level shit
Entering the married zone
married zone and divorced zone are some next level shit
Well thats it with "internet created social terms", there are a thousand definitions and notions about a term.
Me and my friends circle think that the term "friend zone" refers to the "place" you put yourself in, after you have gotten rejected by someone, and then you hope that you can still achieve your goal of getting together with the person by staying long enough friends with them.
Hoping to be the "one" who always stayed by their side, when they needed you, so that the other person might finally acknowledge your "worthiness", and thus achieving your original goal because of your "persistence" or "loyalty", "showing that you truly treasured the person" and so on...
Personally, I don't think somebody else can "friend zone" you or put you in the friend zone.
There is either attraction between the two of you and you get together or there isn't attraction, so you had no chance to begin with.
The in-between is, that you get to know each other better, while for one person (or sometimes for both) the initial (physical) attraction fades, because of a personality/interest mismatch. In rare cases the reverse of this can happen, too: No attraction at all, but after getting to know each other, the attraction grows.
Oh and like some other people said, there is no "window of opportunity" or " limited timeframe" as long as the other person is attracted to you. So don't believe the bullshit of "You need to act fast or she put's you into the friend zone!"
I only know one person that escaped the friend zone.
my wife just put me in the marriage counseling zone
Oh and like some other people said, there is no "window of opportunity" or " limited timeframe" as long as the other person is attracted to you. So don't believe the bullshit of "You need to act fast or she put's you into the friend zone!"
Same underlining cause for him being put into the friend zone initially?
I wonder what friend zoning someone feels like.
Pretty much. We all worked together This guy was smitten with her. She was beautiful, smart, etc. We all hung out and he made his intentions known to her. He was really nice to her as in taking care of her on holidays, birthdays, listening to all her problems, helping her move, etc. I think because of all that she never completely shot him down, but dated other dudes the entire time. She had a terrible breakup, then she broke the emergency glass and they ended up being a couple. Shit moved so fast that they got married within a year. 3 years later they divorced.
IMO, she loved what he did for her and how he took care of every need, but she didn't love him. If that makes sense. I don't think he left any room for her to 'want' anything because he gave her everything. He was devastated.
I don't think it's bullshit because I've seen it happen numerous times.
married zone and divorced zone are some next level shit
I think you're mostly correct- but that there's not necessarily an initial rejection that ever takes place- the trap (for the person with feelings) is that they've got their attraction leading them to want to be around that person, but the potential rejection makes them scared to act on it, because that runs the risk of them not being able to interact going forward (which they think is the worst possible outcome, even though it's what they need to do for a health mental existence)Well thats it with "internet created social terms", there are a thousand definitions and notions about a term.
Me and my friends circle think that the term "friend zone" refers to the "place" you put yourself in, after you have gotten rejected by someone, and then you hope that you can still achieve your goal of getting together with the person by staying long enough friends with them.
Hoping to be the "one" who always stayed by their side, when they needed you, so that the other person might finally acknowledge your "worthiness", and thus achieving your original goal because of your "persistence" or "loyalty", "showing that you truly treasured the person" and so on...
Personally, I don't think somebody else can "friend zone" you or put you in the friend zone.
There is either attraction between the two of you and you get together or there isn't attraction, so you had no chance to begin with.
The in-between is, that you get to know each other better, while for one person (or sometimes for both) the initial (physical) attraction fades, because of a personality/interest mismatch. In rare cases the reverse of this can happen, too: No attraction at all, but after getting to know each other, the attraction grows.
Oh and like some other people said, there is no "window of opportunity" or " limited timeframe" as long as the other person is attracted to you. So don't believe the bullshit of "You need to act fast or she put's you into the friend zone!"
I wonder what friend zoning someone feels like.
"Sorry I only like you as a friend" is a friend zoned as it gets. Guys who never ask aren't friend zoned, they're just chicken shit.Being rejected isn't a person "put into the friend zone." It's being rejected.
A point you were missing from a quoted post: "be willing to walk away if you don't get the desired outcome."
The friend zone is such a stupid concept because the moment some butthurt dude gets rejected and cries "friend zone" it implies that something is owed when that's never the fucking case.
"Sorry I only like you as a friend" is a friend zoned as it gets. Guys who never ask aren't friend zoned, they're just chicken shit.
Why did this happen, though?
The Friend Zone is a relatively new thing, probably last 30 years, and it's mostly the result of men lacking positive masculine dating advice. I'm not talking about misogynists tripe, but stuff our grandfathers already new.
But if you like a girl, ask her out.
Somewhere along the line, guys started being friends with women they're attracted to, with the hope of romance springing from that.
Why is that?
That's a totally losing strategy. And it's happening more and more and these days.
I think you are wrong that it implies this because you take one single theoretical situation.The friend zone is such a stupid concept because the moment some butthurt dude gets rejected and cries "friend zone" it implies that something is owed when that's never the fucking case.
Yeah, you can stay or get out. I agree.Again, that's still rejection only followed up by possible friendship, it's still the rejected party's responsibility to either make the friendship, cut contact, or hell, even ask for delay to think about it.
How does it vilify the uninterested party?
I understand the conversation and tone around that kind of discussion can do that, but how does the term actually in and of itself do that? How does "I'm in the friend zone" differ substantially from "she only sees me as a friend"?
This seems close to the etymology.I believe the friend zone is a bi product of several themes and plot devices of a lot of media in the 80s, 90s, and 00s. I still see it nowadays, though not as much.
The friend zone is a awful thing that was born from a combination of several common beliefs, namely:
- Good things come to those that wait.
- Nice guys finish last.
- True love was right in front of you the whole time.
I try not to blame anyone that feels like the friendzone is a real thing, because they've had these concept drilled into them all throughout their life.
How many sitcoms involved a dweebish guy who had to watch the girl he wanted date these "jerks" that weren't good enough for her?
How many cartoons involved a cute girl interest where the guy really made no effort to initiate anything, and just hoped the girl would see him for who he is?
How many movies showed us a story about how a girl kept dating the wrong guys over and over only to eventually fall madly in love with her best friend who had been there the whole time?
This is what created the friend zone. This horrible idea that all women have to date these horrible assholes because they don't know any better until the sweet male friend swoops in to fix everything? Hell, people still cite Pam and Jim from The Office as a great on screen couple but the entire first 3 season are all about navigating the friend zone.
So now what happens when guys try to experience this in the real world, except it doesn't work? It can't be that they've done something wrong. They've literally followed the playbook of all the movies and tv shows they watch to know what "should" happen... yet it doesn't.
It's just this huge disconnect of what society teaching us vs what actually happens. It actually reminds me of the movie Don Jon. You send this whole movie seeing JGL dealing with a porn addiciton and not being able to cope with the disconnect of real women vs porn women, except for that one scene where you see the same thing illustrated to ScarJo's character where she sees these Romantic stories as a guideline for how love is supposed to work.
So you have two genders that are taught two radically different perspectives on how to deal with "love" from a young age, and neither of them are even close to how it actually works.
This is what created the friendzone, and this is why people still feel like they get trapped in it to this day.
The No Poon Zone.my wife just put me in the marriage counseling zone
Some folk say that on the night of a new moon, he can still be seen roaming the woods.
Pretty much. We all worked together This guy was smitten with her. She was beautiful, smart, etc. We all hung out and he made his intentions known to her. He was really nice to her as in taking care of her on holidays, birthdays, listening to all her problems, helping her move, etc. I think because of all that she never completely shot him down, but dated other dudes the entire time. She had a terrible breakup, then she broke the emergency glass and they ended up being a couple. Shit moved so fast that they got married within a year. 3 years later they divorced.
IMO, she loved what he did for her and how he took care of every need, but she didn't love him. If that makes sense. I don't think he left any room for her to 'want' anything because he gave her everything. He was devastated.
I think you're dead on about the terrible media messages (which are basically just wish-fulfillment) playing into this. I loved that Stranger Things completely subverted these kinds of tropes.I believe the friend zone is a bi product of several themes and plot devices of a lot of media in the 80s, 90s, and 00s. I still see it nowadays, though not as much.
The friend zone is a awful thing that was born from a combination of several common beliefs, namely:
- Good things come to those that wait.
- Nice guys finish last.
- True love was right in front of you the whole time.
I try not to blame anyone that feels like the friendzone is a real thing, because they've had these concept drilled into them all throughout their life.
How many sitcoms involved a dweebish guy who had to watch the girl he wanted date these "jerks" that weren't good enough for her?
How many cartoons involved a cute girl interest where the guy really made no effort to initiate anything, and just hoped the girl would see him for who he is?
How many movies showed us a story about how a girl kept dating the wrong guys over and over only to eventually fall madly in love with her best friend who had been there the whole time?
This is what created the friend zone. This horrible idea that all women have to date these horrible assholes because they don't know any better until the sweet male friend swoops in to fix everything? Hell, people still cite Pam and Jim from The Office as a great on screen couple but the entire first 3 season are all about navigating the friend zone.
So now what happens when guys try to experience this in the real world, except it doesn't work? It can't be that they've done something wrong. They've literally followed the playbook of all the movies and tv shows they watch to know what "should" happen... yet it doesn't.
It's just this huge disconnect of what society teaching us vs what actually happens. It actually reminds me of the movie Don Jon. You send this whole movie seeing JGL dealing with a porn addiciton and not being able to cope with the disconnect of real women vs porn women, except for that one scene where you see the same thing illustrated to ScarJo's character where she sees these Romantic stories as a guideline for how love is supposed to work.
So you have two genders that are taught two radically different perspectives on how to deal with "love" from a young age, and neither of them are even close to how it actually works.
This is what created the friendzone, and this is why people still feel like they get trapped in it to this day.
This seems close to the etymology.
I just tried googling to find more about this, and it looks like the first use of it was Joey telling Ross on Friends he got friendzoned by Rachel, and then when that sort of cultural moment gets mixed with old romantic comedies that were almost always some aloof, average dude that couldn't get a hot girl, and then the redpillers found the Ladder Theory, it's been all shit from there socially.
I don't think it's always about rejection. Take this for an example. A guy starts freshman year and in class he's sitting next to a girl he's attracted to. They are friendly, he shares notes and stuff. Thinking that the nicer he is the more she may appreciate him and something can blossom over time. Then there's another guy who sees her in the next class and automatically asks her out that night for a date. By no fault of anyone, guy number 1 is end the firndzone without even asking and being rejected. IMO friend zone is the place where you go when you take things too slowly and other people are more aggressive than you areI've always felt it was coined by guys that couldn't handle rejection.
Ultimately this friend zone can be universally defined as a self imposed hell. Anyone who uses the phrase as a way to describe a place someone else places them in doesnt seem to realize they have other choices other than hanging around.
romance is so much about right place at the right time
I don't think people get that
Afaik, your first definition is correct. I guess the "putting someone in the friend zone" is just the lack of acceptance of the romantic gesture or intention (or in some dude's cases, the pitiful inability to make such intentions known). It's almost completely passive, but the term is a useful shorthand, I guess.
I don't think it's bullshit because I've seen it happen numerous times.
I think you're mostly correct- but that there's not necessarily an initial rejection that ever takes place- the trap (for the person with feelings) is that they've got their attraction leading them to want to be around that person, but the potential rejection makes them scared to act on it, because that runs the risk of them not being able to interact going forward (which they think is the worst possible outcome, even though it's what they need to do for a health mental existence)
my wife just put me in the marriage counseling zone
this is why i specifically added to the females response "but we can still be friends"Being rejected isn't a person "put into the friend zone." It's being rejected.
A point you were missing from a quoted post: "be willing to walk away if you don't get the desired outcome."
It may be too anecdotal to go that far I guess. I have only ever seen the term "friend zone" used unironically by bitter people who feel entitled to attention from the opposite sex.
Also sucks for the girl who thought she had a friend but it turns out he only wanted sex.
well yeah. In real life the bullies and Alphas still get the girls at the end. That's the disconnect. It doesn't make for a good movie though.I believe the friend zone is a bi product of several themes and plot devices of a lot of media in the 80s, 90s, and 00s. I still see it nowadays, though not as much.
The friend zone is a awful thing that was born from a combination of several common beliefs, namely:
- Good things come to those that wait.
- Nice guys finish last.
- True love was right in front of you the whole time.
I try not to blame anyone that feels like the friendzone is a real thing, because they've had these concept drilled into them all throughout their life.
How many sitcoms involved a dweebish guy who had to watch the girl he wanted date these "jerks" that weren't good enough for her?
How many cartoons involved a cute girl interest where the guy really made no effort to initiate anything, and just hoped the girl would see him for who he is?
How many movies showed us a story about how a girl kept dating the wrong guys over and over only to eventually fall madly in love with her best friend who had been there the whole time?
This is what created the friend zone. This horrible idea that all women have to date these horrible assholes because they don't know any better until the sweet male friend swoops in to fix everything? Hell, people still cite Pam and Jim from The Office as a great on screen couple but the entire first 3 season are all about navigating the friend zone.
So now what happens when guys try to experience this in the real world, except it doesn't work? It can't be that they've done something wrong. They've literally followed the playbook of all the movies and tv shows they watch to know what "should" happen... yet it doesn't.
It's just this huge disconnect of what society teaching us vs what actually happens. It actually reminds me of the movie Don Jon. You send this whole movie seeing JGL dealing with a porn addiciton and not being able to cope with the disconnect of real women vs porn women, except for that one scene where you see the same thing illustrated to ScarJo's character where she sees these Romantic stories as a guideline for how love is supposed to work.
So you have two genders that are taught two radically different perspectives on how to deal with "love" from a young age, and neither of them are even close to how it actually works.
This is what created the friendzone, and this is why people still feel like they get trapped in it to this day.
The friend zone is born out of the sexist notion that a girl is obligated to repay a man showing basic human decency to her with sex :/
Where does this theory comes from that all the people who cry about being friend zoned are doing that because they couldn't have sex?
Isn't that kind of sexist thinking too? That all guys are just wanting sex, especially if they can't handle rejection?