The Silver
Member
I'll never forget throwing that Charmeleon into the lava and seeing it come out as a Charizard, stop trying to trample on my childhood OP.
The concept is "take photos of Pokemon in the wild", which has potential and immediate fan appeal, but the game is merely a very shallow (and stylistically plain) rail-shooter that is entirely exhausted before you know it (small and simple, in addition to "short"). There being no or unknown games thematically revolving around photography before or after just makes it more a disposable novelty from the 90s - highly susceptible to it being remembered more fondly for its concept or the nostalgia (like, one of the most interesting things about the game is that you could go to blockbuster to print the banal photos). If they do make another Pokemon Snap, it would be faced with a lot more criticism (it probably won't even allowed to be a rail-shooter, let alone a very poor one).
Did anyone actually go to blockbuster to print out their photos?
Puzzle League > Snap > TCG > Conquest > Stadium mini-games > nope, there's only trash here
Usually, when I post in a thread, not EVERYONE above me is wrong.
Best post.
I went to Blockbuster to print out photos.
at least there are cool secrets and stuff for replay value but yeah awesome game, wish it was longer.The core mechanic is excellent, the levels are great, but it's a short and small self-contained game with not a lot of replay. It is absolutely begging to be iterated on.
open giant world pokemon snap mode omggggIt would be cool if there were two modes: on track and free roam. Go on track to progress and unlock secrets, but you can also get out and just see Pokemon interacting with each other and take pictures.
Did anyone actually go to blockbuster to print out their photos?
The console Pokemon games aren't good to get started with. Go for X/Y, its a great intro into the series.I've actually never played a Pokemon game. I'm 46yo ... was almost 19 when the NES first came out ... so never got into it. Thinking about trying one now because the series has obviously stood the test of time. Pretty sure it started on gameboy but I'd rather try a TV console game or modern handheld for my first exposure. Thinking about trying Pokemon XD - Gale of Darkness, or would I be better off with something else?
.
I've actually never played a Pokemon game. I'm 46yo ... was almost 19 when the NES first came out ... so never got into it. Thinking about trying one now because the series has obviously stood the test of time. Pretty sure it started on gameboy but I'd rather try a TV console game or modern handheld for my first exposure. Thinking about trying Pokemon XD - Gale of Darkness, or would I be better off with something else?
.
I didn't understand the idea of Pokemon Snap when I was a kid. I saw the commercials, and it just seemed dumb. You look at Pokemon... And take pictures of them? Who thought of this? Why would I want to do this? How would this be fun? What made it worse is when the Pokemon Snap kid turned up in the cartoon, it wasted an episode on a stupid character from a pointless game.
It's pretty much the same mechanics as actual photography (in real world, I mean). Except that the game provides you interesting subjects.I didn't understand the idea of Pokemon Snap when I was a kid. I saw the commercials, and it just seemed dumb. You look at Pokemon... And take pictures of them? Who thought of this? Why would I want to do this? How would this be fun?
It's pretty much the same mechanics as actual photography (in real world, I mean). Except that the game provides you interesting subjects.
There's enough games available (recently Afrika, and I wish it was available in Europe T_T ...) to prove that the formula is appealing to some people at least.
Even Forever blue and games like this have similar mechanics. See also Pilotwings.