Posted today:
This gets a huge rolleyes from me, especially the comment on the graphics. I dislike Madden's graphics as much as the next guy but this is not supposed to be a next-gen title. WTF? When will sites unqualified to comment on something learn that it is best not to do so in the first place?
Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Sunday August 21, @02:32PM
from the exclusivity-a-hail-mary-and-receiver-drops-the-ball dept.
aendeuryu writes "The first reviews are in for Madden '06, and the reception is underwhelming -- it's scoring an average rating of 79% on gamerankings.com (at the time of this submission). The reviewers on Gamespot (7.8) and 1up.com (9.0) have different takes on the game, but the readership of both sites doesn't (7.4 and 7.8 respectively). Gamespot's criticisms put the game in a less-than-exciting light: the new QB-vision feature adds realism but takes away from basic fun, and (perhaps most damning) the graphics rate a 7 out of 10 on what was supposed to be a next-generation title. Normally, a mediocre game release isn't a big deal, except that, because of EA's negotiated exclusivity deal with the NFL, this is the only NFL title you'll get to play this year. So, what are the players to do?"
This gets a huge rolleyes from me, especially the comment on the graphics. I dislike Madden's graphics as much as the next guy but this is not supposed to be a next-gen title. WTF? When will sites unqualified to comment on something learn that it is best not to do so in the first place?