Slightly better or the same. Be ware potential m.2 ssd buyers. Dont screw too hard, make sure it has even clearance if you get those with taller heatsink.Are we talking ps3 blue hard drive screw levels of shitty?
is it shit or the shit, im confused now..
Never had an issue with them. I think they're great.
use the right screwdriver and you'll be fine.
also m.2 nvme is nice but for games it's not really worth it. well, i mean SATA at this point is not gonna be updated so NVME is the future but SATA is just fine for games. until NVME becomes more standard then it's only really useful to people doing heavy work on their PC.
use the right screwdriver and you'll be fine.
also m.2 nvme is nice but for games it's not really worth it. well, i mean SATA at this point is not gonna be updated so NVME is the future but SATA is just fine for games. until NVME becomes more standard then it's only really useful to people doing heavy work on their PC.
reminds me of the time I bent the pins on my friends 8700k while installing it
Outside of high end drives I dont see much difference in price.I've seen a few YouTube videos comparing m2 to SSD load speeds and, while it tends to be a bit all over the place at times, in the main the takeaway is that you're spending more money on m2 and only shaving off 1 or 2 seconds. I saw one or two instances where the difference was 4 seconds, but that seemed to be the exception, rather than the rule. It's certainly not an HDD to SSD improvement. Hell, it's not even a 10% improvement in most cases.
PCIe 4.0 game load times: is a next-gen SSD better for gaming?
We put the Corsair Force MP600 through its paces in three games to see if the PCIe 4.0 spec has any effect on game load timeswww.pcgamesn.com
use the right screwdriver and you'll be fine.
also m.2 nvme is nice but for games it's not really worth it. well, i mean SATA at this point is not gonna be updated so NVME is the future but SATA is just fine for games. until NVME becomes more standard then it's only really useful to people doing heavy work on their PC.
NVME isn't any faster than sata for games. NVME makes sense when you have large files and you need to copy them over to other NVME drive, but when it comes to reading a lot of small files it has effectively same perfomance as SATA3 ssd.
I got sata 3 ssd evo 850 samsung i believe 512gb and its far slower then a 970 evo plus m2 drive. I use both of them to benchmark with and frankly big loading games u see a drastical change in performance. Also less spikes in games because of background loading. Which reduces pop in and stuttering. BDO its really visible on this front.
I don't know where they got those prices. I just bought a 970 evo (not plus) for half the price of the corsair. Thats the reason I made that purchase. Half the price for a current small difference in performance is a big deal. When the 4.0 controllers get better or when players besides Corsair and Gigabyte throw in, then Ill jump in 4.0.Interesting. I wonder what the bottleneck is. Is the OS also installed on the same drive as the games in these tests? Do the controllers just kind of suck compared to Samsung? The PCIe 4 drive just barely beats the gen 3 EVO. Though it is cheaper so its worth it. Similar delta for traditional SSDs to M2 drvies. You get about a 5% improvment in load times tops going NVME over SSD and at best half of that gain again going for a new NVME PCIe gen4 over an EVO.
I watched a comparison video between HDD, SSD, NVME and damn. I am glad the solid state options are cheap enough nowadays.
frankly big loading games u see a drastical change in performanceWrong.
I got sata 3 ssd evo 850 samsung i believe 512gb and its far slower then a 970 evo plus m2 drive. I use both of them to benchmark with and frankly big loading games u see a drastical change in performance. Also less spikes in games because of background loading. Which reduces pop in and stuttering. BDO its really visible on this front.
Some games won't profit out of it like league of legends or path of exile, because most of the time its about connections that you wait on instead of loading times. But in games like ac unity/origin there is a big difference between the two. It also helps big time with emulation and dealing with large shader files.
I use a Samsung SSD in my PS4 Pro. It's a little bit faster. Shame it doesn't take full advantage. But I plan on using it when I finish my pc build in the winter.
Important little distinction: m.2 is a form factor. SATA and NVMe are the actual different standards, and both can come in m.2 (in addition to the standard 2.5" for the former).
It can't be. I'm pretty sure the PS3 blue screw was made of butter.Are we talking ps3 blue hard drive screw levels of shitty?
Wrong.
I got sata 3 ssd evo 850 samsung i believe 512gb and its far slower then a 970 evo plus m2 drive. I use both of them to benchmark with and frankly big loading games u see a drastical change in performance. Also less spikes in games because of background loading. Which reduces pop in and stuttering. BDO its really visible on this front.
Some games won't profit out of it like league of legends or path of exile, because most of the time its about connections that you wait on instead of loading times. But in games like ac unity/origin there is a big difference between the two. It also helps big time with emulation and dealing with large shader files.