zero margin
Member
SalsaShark said:Pretty good actually, probably because it's not his movie.
Didn't he write it?
SalsaShark said:Pretty good actually, probably because it's not his movie.
Have patience. His career isn't actually over yet.Speedymanic said:So what happened? Was he just a flash in the pan director/writer? Did he use the twist too many times?
chalkitdown1 said:Don't most people like the smell of their own farts?
zero margin said:Didn't he write it?
Jessie Keyser is a 13-year-old girl from the village of Clifton, Indiana in the 1840s. During a village-wide bout of diphtheria, Jessie's mother reveals that the actual year is 1996, and that Clifton Village is actually a tourist attraction, a replica of a historical village. She secretly sends Jessie out of the village to retrieve a cure for the disease from a man who disagreed on having Clifton as a tourist attraction
Didn't he write Signs? As far as I'm concerned, that's his best screenplay. I linked to this scene in the "greatest line from movies" thread. I think having Mel Gibson had a lot to do with how that scene turned out, but it shows (including the scene directly after that) that MNS has writing chops.quadriplegicjon said:He has to stop writing his films. I still think he is actually a really good director, just a shit writer.
Veidt said:Abrams is the next spielberg. no one else.
Not after Cloverfield he isn'tVeidt said:Abrams is the next spielberg. no one else.
Not even worth a "lol", only a smh will do.Veidt said:Abrams is the next spielberg. no one else.
Kusagari said:He's a horrible director at getting good performances out of his actors. The Happening had some of the worst(funniest) 'acting' jobs I've ever seen in my life.
news to me that he directed cloverfieldZoramon089 said:Not after Cloverfield he isn't
Have you seen Lady in the Water? It's not exactly subtle.Borgnine said:Where is everyone getting "he got too full of himself" from? I've never heard anything like that, unless I missed something. Just seems to me like the quality of his creative works has declined since his first one, this isn't unheard of.
wikipedia said:Variety magazine wrote a scathing advance review that appeared on July 16, 2006. Common complaints about the film were that little effort was put into getting the viewer to believe in the world, that few moments of the film could be taken seriously, and that Shyamalan was using the film as a form of self-indulgence; instead of having a minor cameo, as in most of his films, Shyamalan cast himself as a visionary whose writing changes the world, and included a film critic portrayed as arrogant, self-assured, and passive who is despised by the other characters and who ultimately is violently killed. Many reviewers attacked this perceived self-indulgence...
Catalix said:Have you seen Lady in the Water?
Bit-Bit said:Terrible pacing issues, the worst edits, and all of the actors acted like they weren't given directions for what to do in any scene. Most just stood around until they had a line to say. Not to mention the amateur framing of dialog scenes. Just extreme closeups and awkward positioning of the actors.
Which only shows how stupid is this movie.dave is ok said:He didn't even come up with the "twist" in Sixth Sense until his third or fourth draft of the screenplay. His entire career is one happy accident.
trineo_feo said:I for one love The Village. If you don't watch it expecting some big horror movie, it is fantastic. Something about the environment, the music...
trineo_feo said:I for one love The Village. If you don't watch it expecting some big horror movie, it is fantastic. Something about the environment, the music...
Vinci said:I agree with this. As a director, he's fine.
Veidt said:Abrams is the next spielberg. no one else.
Apparently you've not seen The Departed.Trojita said:Mark Wahlberg is an actor? I thought he just played himself in every one of his movies.?
This made me laugh a little:Catalix said:Have you seen Lady in the Water? It's not exactly subtle.
Also panned was the fact that the film was based on a bedtime story Shyamalan told to his children; Pete Vonder Haar of Film Threat commented: "If Shyamalan is going to use his kids as a focus group for future projects, maybe he should start making movies for Nickelodeon already and stop wasting our time".[15] Shyamalan went on to direct a film adaptation of Nickelodeon's Avatar the Last Airbender television series, which got overwhelmingly negative reviews.
SalsaShark said:Pretty good actually, probably because it's not his movie.
and the people who should of kept his shit in check assumed he must know what he's doing and gave him carte blanche.Leunam said:He got really full of himself.
RustyNails said:
B_Rik_Schitthaus said:and the people who should of kept his shit in check assumed he must know what he's doing and gave him carte blanche.
Yeah but he's different thanDiscotheque said:what the hell. he just bangs his chest like a chimp during the entire film. It's all about Boogie Nights. Sure he's probably just playing his marky-mark persona there but that's his best performance for sure.
Polk said:Which only shows how stupid is this movie.
I mean, how many times doctor should have eat/drink/use toilet/open door/have conversation with anyone/buy anything?
And who hired him?
It it was one day, sure, I could believe some perfect storm of coincidences.
Six months? Even deaf,blind and mute idiot would figure out something's wrong.
Veidt said:Abrams is the next spielberg. no one else.
SpacLock said:There will never be another Spielberg.
Zoramon089 said:Not after Cloverfield he isn't
Talladega Knight said:news to me that he directed cloverfield
Critics rightfully panned it because Shyamalan cast himself as a writer who was destined to change the world.Plinko said:I LOVED Lady in the Water.
The problem with it and public reception was two-fold:
1) Critics panned it because of the critic character in the movie (played by Bob Balaban). He played the role perfectly.
2) The movie was written as a bedtime story. However, it was advertised by the movie company just like his other movies. People went in expecting a huge shocking twist at the end when, in fact, there wasn't one.
I still think it is a fantastic movie.
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTSpeedymanic said:Well?
He put some really good movies but after Signs